I have brought up a great argument against Evolution as the means of creation.
"Great"? Because a myth says Inanna created all humans from clay and all animals, or whatever myth you pick, a folk tale is not "great" evidence.
A story in Genesis that gets everything wrong, "kind", cosmic waters above earth, the earth is just the firmament, 7 heavens, and all sorts of nonsense, which also follows Mesopotamian stories closely and have been shown to be interdependent by scholars, isn't evidence for anything except a mythology existed as one of thousands of others. In Mesopotamian they all sounded very similar, including the deities, including Yahweh.
In the real world there are unbelievable amounts of evidence for evolution. Just saying the word "creationism" is not an argument against evolution. You have to explain all the evidence and show it supports creationism. If it involves a creator you need to demonstrate the creator, not a folk tale with a claim who no other nation saw because they saw their own fictional folk tale deity (in their mind).
Which you are unable to answer to my satisfaction.
I'm not trying to answer to someone who doesn't look at evidence, that is a delusional person. I'm putting some facts out there best I can. For people who may care.
People who want to say it's all just Vishnu or whatever and not engage with the real world and test their theory I don't want to waste my time.
No different than a flat earther. You will never convince them NASA isn't a conspiracy, gravity is fake and all scientists are in on it and so on.
I still don't see a reasonable answer as to how you can come up with the first egg, when it takes something to lay that egg.
First, why don't you research evolution? Why would you want information from the internet when you can learn from a biologist. I linked to one on youtube who deals with creationist claims. YOu would want to test your theory to make sure you can debunk all his arguments.
The internet will just snow you, you have no idea if the information is correct. Same with religious organizations, they can sell you apologetics as amateurs in history and people buy their lies all the time.
I already explained the basics to you , you did not have any rebuttal or explanation as to why it's not possible or probable. Simple life used cells as protection? How hard is that?
When did the first eggs evolve?
The earliest living creatures made babies by dividing themselves in half, so that one
cell became two cells. But about 1.4 billion years ago, some creatures with more than one cell began to develop specialized cells. These specialized cells could combine with the cells from another creature. Together, they could make a new creature. These were the first eggs.
As time went on, these creatures evolved into
plants and
animals, but both the plants and the animals continued to use specialized cells as eggs.
When did eggs get hard shells?
The next step in egg evolution came when reptiles began to lay eggs with hard shells made of
calcium carbonate, a
molecule combining
carbon and
calcium. Inside these shells, a baby reptile could grow safely until it was big enough to be born. That way, the reptiles didn’t have to lay their eggs in the water. The eggshell holds a miniature ocean for the tiny embryo to grow in. Many animals, like
snakes and
birds, still lay hard eggs today.
About 200 million years ago, however, some reptiles evolved into
mammals that kept their eggs inside them until the babies were big enough to be born. The earliest animals that kept their eggs inside them were the ancestors of the
opossum. Today, all mammals (except the platypus and the echidna!) keep their eggs inside them until the baby is born –
horses, dogs, cows, donkeys, sheep, pigs, chimpanzees, and
people.
Egg evolution: from the first cells dividing, to the soft eggs of fish roe, to the hard eggs of reptiles and birds that hold a tiny ocean...
quatr.us
Darwin was right about one thing for sure - When he said It was totally absurd.
He also said it was possible in small steps. So you are cherry-picking Darwin. He was the first, the first physicist who came up with black holes, neutron stars, the big bang, expanding universe, expanding even faster now universe, all said it was crazy, absurd and possibly not true.
But evidence over generations is what convinces science.
Just believe whatever you want.
No thank you. I have no desire to believe whatever I want. I might believe in some nonsense deity or afterlife that is clearly an import from Greek religion.
I will believe what evidence warrants belief in. Rational, logical, empirical knowledge will help see through all the snow jobs people have put out there for people to buy into and believe. I need evidence.
I don't need your help. You have not demonstrated to be someone I would seek for help because you don't vale truth at all.
Meantime, scientists posit that fish eventually evolved to become humans.
