Another irrefutable proof that God created all things using mathematical induction. And a proof that The Bible is the word of God.

[SavedByTheLord]

It suggests that Atheism is mostly a product of Pauline-Christianity, please, right?

Regards
_______________

Paul was the apostle of the Gentiles and preached Christ crucified.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Grass is very young. Algae was first.

Evolutionary history of plants - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

But that is just from the false theory of evolution.

 

[McBell]

But that is just from the false theory of evolution.

Which is more accurate than your Bible....

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Which is more accurate than your Bible....

Evolution is the Theory of Nothing. It have never answered the question of the origin of anything in all creation.

 

[ratiocinator]

Evolution is the Theory of Nothing. It have never answered the question of the origin of anything in all creation.

False.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

False.

What was the first living creature and what features did it have?

 

[ratiocinator]

What was the first living creature and what features did it have?

There you go again repeating daft questions. This has been explained to you. The fact you're ignoring the explanations and just mechanically repeating it like a mantra, is strong evidence that you are ignorant of the science and don't want to learn anything.

 

[McBell]

Evolution is the Theory of Nothing. It have never answered the question of the origin of anything in all creation.

That is because you are talking about abiogenesis, not evolution.
Thus you are merely beating up a strawman.
Congrats though, you certainly beat the stuffing out of your strawman.

 

[The Hammer]

But that is just from the false theory of evolution.

Mmk

 

[Eddi]

What was the first living creature and what features did it have?

Not this nonsense again

This has been addressed countless times

You never learn

You think you can overturn science with your ancient mythology

You do know that the evolution issue is not a debate like say abortion or guns?

It's about knowledge verses ignorance

And you are on the side of ignorance

Do you really think you know better than all the world's biologists?

You don't study biology you study ancient myths

Nothing wrong with that so long as you don't aquire the delusion that any of that gives you any authority to debate evolution with actual biologists

Because it doesn't

 

[Subduction Zone]

Bondservants.
You have the wrong version.

No, bondservants were Hebrew Hebrew slaves of a temporary sort. There was chattel slavery in the Bible too. This is the problem when you use a version of the Bible that you do not understand. You should be using a version with more modern English.

 

[Subduction Zone]

But that is just from the false theory of evolution.

You misspelled "confirmed millions of times".

"But that is just from the confirmed millions of times theory of evolution."

See? Much more accurate when the spelling is correct.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

You misspelled "confirmed millions of times".

"But that is just from the confirmed millions of times theory of evolution."

See? Much more accurate when the spelling is correct.

Evolution is the The Theory of Nothing.

It is like a comedy where the evolutionists say, “ask us anything about origins”. So, you start asking them questions. And each time they say, “I do not know”. After a while you give up, they then say, “is there any other origin question that you want us to answer?”

 

[Subduction Zone]

Evolution is the The Theory of Nothing.

It is like a comedy where the evolutionists say, “ask us anything about origins”. So, you start asking them questions. And each time they say, “I do not know”. After a while you give up, they then say, “is there any other origin question that you want us to answer?”

Just because you do not understand it does not make it a theory of nothing.

The question is why are you afraid to learn even the basics of science? Is it because if you understood you would see how the theory is strongly supported by evidence? It is strange to live in such fear as you have when the cure is rather easy.

 

[paarsurrey]

paarsurrey said:
"Depicting a blood sacrifice as an act of love is pretty off-putting as well "!

I hold that Pauline-Christians maintain such horrific ideas that have no origin in Jesus/Yeshua- the truthful Israelite Messiah, are they on a mission to convert the masses to Atheism, please, right?

It suggests that Atheism is mostly a product of Pauline-Christianity, please, right?

Paul was the apostle of the Gentiles and preached Christ crucified.

Why name here Hellenist-Paul as an apostle, when earlier and lately the Christianity people consider him the Antichrist rather than as an apostle, everybody know that he was not among the "twelve" please, right?
Aren't Atheism and its other likes , like flip sides of Pauline-Christianity people, please, right?

Regards
___________________

Amazon.ca
https://www.amazon.ca › Paul-Antichrist-Christianity-...

Paul The Antichrist: and the Invention of 'Christianity': Mt. Sion, Robert: 9783841770943: Books - Amazon.ca.
$42.14

Apostle Paul Antichrist, Second Edition eBook​

Amazon.ca
https://www.amazon.ca › Apostle-Antichrist-Second-G...

Apostle Paul Antichrist, Second Edition eBook : Noory, George: Amazon.ca: Kindle Store.
$4.30 · ‎In stock

Nietzsche's Understanding of the Apostle Paul​

JSTOR
https://www.jstor.org › stable › 9781469656557_oflaherty
Nietzsche wanted to oppose Christianity as the Antichrist, philosophy up to his time as a free spirit, and decadence morality in general as an immoralist. Under ...

Paul's Prophetic Outline in 2 Thessalonians 2​

Andrews University
https://www.andrews.edu › Periodicals › AUSS
PDF
by HK LARONDELLE · 1983 · Cited by 13 — It is by thus placing the NT antichrist prophecies within the framework of. Daniel's apocalyptic root context that new light can be shed on the historical order ...

Christianity Is Being Led By the Supreme Antichrist Named Paul​

everand.com
https://www.everand.com › Ebooks › Christianity

Read Christianity Is Being Led By the Supreme Antichrist Named Paul by Rodolfo Martin Vitangcol with a free trial. Read millions of eBooks and audiobooks on ...

Saint Paul, the First Antichrist - John Ben Regesh​

Google Books
https://books.google.com › books › about › Saint_Pau...
Saint Paul, The First Anti-Christ · John Ben Regesh Limited preview - 2011. Bibliographic information. Title, Saint Paul, the First Antichrist. Author, John Ben ...

Apostle Paul Antichrist - Jeffrey Daughterty: 9781620306192​

AbeBooks
https://www.abebooks.com › plp
Apostle Paul Antichrist by Jeffrey Daughterty - ISBN 10: 1620306190 - ISBN 13: 9781620306192 - NCK PRESS - 2014 - Softcover.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

paarsurrey said:
"Depicting a blood sacrifice as an act of love is pretty off-putting as well "!

I hold that Pauline-Christians maintain such horrific ideas that have no origin in Jesus/Yeshua- the truthful Israelite Messiah, are they on a mission to convert the masses to Atheism, please, right?



Why name here Hellenist-Paul as an apostle, when earlier and lately the Christianity people consider him the Antichrist rather than as an apostle, everybody know that he was not among the "twelve" please, right?
Aren't Atheism and its other likes , like flip sides of Pauline-Christianity people, please, right?

Regards
___________________
View attachment 85575
Amazon.ca
https://www.amazon.ca › Paul-Antichrist-Christianity-...

Paul The Antichrist: and the Invention of 'Christianity': Mt. Sion, Robert: 9783841770943: Books - Amazon.ca.
$42.14

Apostle Paul Antichrist, Second Edition eBook​

View attachment 85576
Amazon.ca
https://www.amazon.ca › Apostle-Antichrist-Second-G...

Apostle Paul Antichrist, Second Edition eBook : Noory, George: Amazon.ca: Kindle Store.
$4.30 · ‎In stock

Nietzsche's Understanding of the Apostle Paul​

View attachment 85572
JSTOR
https://www.jstor.org › stable › 9781469656557_oflaherty
Nietzsche wanted to oppose Christianity as the Antichrist, philosophy up to his time as a free spirit, and decadence morality in general as an immoralist. Under ...

Paul's Prophetic Outline in 2 Thessalonians 2​

View attachment 85571
Andrews University
https://www.andrews.edu › Periodicals › AUSS
PDF
by HK LARONDELLE · 1983 · Cited by 13 — It is by thus placing the NT antichrist prophecies within the framework of. Daniel's apocalyptic root context that new light can be shed on the historical order ...

Christianity Is Being Led By the Supreme Antichrist Named Paul​

View attachment 85573
everand.com
https://www.everand.com › Ebooks › Christianity

Read Christianity Is Being Led By the Supreme Antichrist Named Paul by Rodolfo Martin Vitangcol with a free trial. Read millions of eBooks and audiobooks on ...

Saint Paul, the First Antichrist - John Ben Regesh​

View attachment 85574
Google Books
https://books.google.com › books › about › Saint_Pau...
Saint Paul, The First Anti-Christ · John Ben Regesh Limited preview - 2011. Bibliographic information. Title, Saint Paul, the First Antichrist. Author, John Ben ...

Apostle Paul Antichrist - Jeffrey Daughterty: 9781620306192​

View attachment 85577
AbeBooks
https://www.abebooks.com › plp
Apostle Paul Antichrist by Jeffrey Daughterty - ISBN 10: 1620306190 - ISBN 13: 9781620306192 - NCK PRESS - 2014 - Softcover.

And yet about 2.5 billion Christians see it as the greatest act of love ever.
And many more who have passed away.

 

[Subduction Zone]

And yet about 2.5 billion Christians see it as the greatest act of love ever.
And many more who have passed away.

No they don't. At least not according to you.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

If you are quoting new versions, and you are, you are deceived.
Satan has deceived you. The no God assumption leads to the no Satan assumption.

Your no Zeus assumption leads to the no Hades assumption.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Your no Zeus assumption leads to the no Hades assumption.

Who?
Did Zeus write a book?
How many are Zeusian?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

But that is just from the false theory of evolution.

So you ask a question, get an answer and then reject it because it doesn't suite your a priori narrative?
Because it's not the answer you decided before hand that you wanted to have?

Why even ask the question then?