• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Another irrefutable proof that God created all things using mathematical induction. And a proof that The Bible is the word of God.

SavedByTheLord

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Esteban X said:
Homer (not Simpson) wrote hymns to the Pagan gods under inspiration, just as the writers of the Bible did. How are these any less valid?
Click to expand...
So who were the pagan gods?
the sun, the planets - jupiter, Saturn, mercury, mars, Venus,
Homer was nuts and it makes no sense to compare Homer to the God Almighty Creator of the Bible.
 
Esteban X

Esteban X

Active Member
SavedByTheLord said:
So who were the pagan gods?
the sun, the planets - jupiter, Saturn, mercury, mars, Venus,
Homer was nuts and it makes no sense to compare Homer to the God Almighty Creator of the Bible.
Click to expand...
Just to be clear I do not compare Homer to IHVH, El Chaddai, or Elohim your so called God Almighty, I compare Homer to the authors of the Bible, Moses and Prophets et al. Great Pan, Mighty Zeus, Fair Aphrodite and the other Elemental forces I compare to your god, and to be honest they leave him in the dust
And I'm not even certain I believe in the Old Gods.
 
SavedByTheLord

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Esteban X said:
Just to be clear I do not compare Homer to IHVH, El Chaddai, or Elohim your so called God Almighty, I compare Homer to the authors of the Bible, Moses and Prophets et al. Great Pan, Mighty Zeus, Fair Aphrodite and the other Elemental forces I compare to your god, and to be honest they leave him in the dust
And I'm not even certain I believe in the Old Gods.
Click to expand...
The pagan gods were just devils which is why the pagans were deceived into worshipping inanimate objects.
The authors of the Bible were inspired by God the Creator of all things.

BTW the James Webb Telescope has now produces enough evidence to refute the Big Bang, the expansion of the universe and the red shift explanation.
 
Kelly of the Phoenix

Kelly of the Phoenix

Well-Known Member
SavedByTheLord said:
In doing the genetic engineering, you would show that random mutations could not do it.
Dog breading falls somewhere in between the 2.

It is not just the growth gene that makes it imposoble to make a very large dog. Almost all the systems in the dog would have to modified eventually.
To accommodate the larger body and to provide blood to that larger body, the heart will need to be larger to pump the blood. But then the arteries, blood vessels, capillaries would need to be widened to keep the increased blood pressure from causing stroke, etc.
The structural proportions of the bones would need to be changed also.
At a certain size, the dog would have a problem raising its head up and down.
The giraffe has special valves that regulate blood flood to do this, which BTW proves the giraffe did not evolve.
Click to expand...
That there is a long list of things to do doesn’t mean that it can’t be done.
 
Kelly of the Phoenix

Kelly of the Phoenix

Well-Known Member
McBell said:
Ah, but see, in natural selection it is god doing the selecting.
In genetic engineering it is man doing the selecting.
And since man is not equal to god, genetic engineering is oft times demonized as "Playing God".
Click to expand...
As many problems as God’s creatures have, I think God is only playing God too.
 
SavedByTheLord

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Eddi said:
The God of the Bible seems very nuts to me
Click to expand...
This man is not a 6 day recent creationist. While I do not agree with is no time theory, the first 14:34 of the video uses the JWST discoveries to refute the Big Bang.


You have no idea who controls the unsaved world.

There has been abundant evidence that have refuted the Big Bang, abiogenesis, evolution and billions of years for many decades now.
You are in a religious cult.
Your own guys are abandoning it in droves, but they do not yet have a new theory to replace it.
The Big Bang and the redshift theory came in part from a RCC priest.
He is called the Father of the Big Bang. RCC priests are called father.

The RCC started backing evolution in the 1950s.
The RCC pushed the Big Bang Theory and billions of years.
Just like the RCC at the time of Galileo, the RCC refused to believe the truth that Galileo discovered.
And today it is the very same things.
Oh the great irony.
Galileo used an improved telescope to prove the establishment religious dogma back then false.
And the JWST is an improved telescope that is doing the very same today.

The James Webb Space Telescope has now produced enough evidence to refute the Big Bang, the expansion of the universe and the red shift explanation.
The JWST killed all the of the following.
RIP BB
RIP red shift theory
RIP expansion.
RIP billions of years.
RIP circular reasoning of the rocks dating the fossils and the fossils dating the rocks.
RIP evolution.
RIP uniformitarianism.
RIP abiogenesis.
RIP supposed old age radioactive decay dating.

Looking back to supposedly about 300 million years after the Big Bang, not only are there no pop 3 stars (refutes the Big Bang) but the stars show a chemical signature of being billions of years old (also refutes the Big Bang).
There are also no galaxy collisions nor evidence of damage from galaxy collisions (also refutes the Big Bang).
Not only that, but the galaxies should look enlarged due to an illusion caused by the expansion. They do not. (also refutes the Big Bang)
Not only that, but the early universe has an abundance of heavy elements, especially nickel (also refutes the Big Bang).
And there is more yet.

Apparently, there are all these anomalies that are being discovered.

An anomaly is just evidence which refutes all the false theories of evolution and billions of years.
 
Eddi

Eddi

Christianity, Taoism, and Humanism
Premium Member
SavedByTheLord said:
This man is not a 6 day recent creationist. While I do not agree with is no time theory, the first 14:34 of the video uses the JWST discoveries to refute the Big Bang.


You have no idea who controls the unsaved world.

There has been abundant evidence that have refuted the Big Bang, abiogenesis, evolution and billions of years for many decades now.
You are in a religious cult.
Your own guys are abandoning it in droves, but they do not yet have a new theory to replace it.
The Big Bang and the redshift theory came in part from a RCC priest.
He is called the Father of the Big Bang. RCC priests are called father.

The RCC started backing evolution in the 1950s.
The RCC pushed the Big Bang Theory and billions of years.
Just like the RCC at the time of Galileo, the RCC refused to believe the truth that Galileo discovered.
And today it is the very same things.
Oh the great irony.
Galileo used an improved telescope to prove the establishment religious dogma back then false.
And the JWST is an improved telescope that is doing the very same today.

The James Webb Space Telescope has now produced enough evidence to refute the Big Bang, the expansion of the universe and the red shift explanation.
The JWST killed all the of the following.
RIP BB
RIP red shift theory
RIP expansion.
RIP billions of years.
RIP circular reasoning of the rocks dating the fossils and the fossils dating the rocks.
RIP evolution.
RIP uniformitarianism.
RIP abiogenesis.
RIP supposed old age radioactive decay dating.

Looking back to supposedly about 300 million years after the Big Bang, not only are there no pop 3 stars (refutes the Big Bang) but the stars show a chemical signature of being billions of years old (also refutes the Big Bang).
There are also no galaxy collisions nor evidence of damage from galaxy collisions (also refutes the Big Bang).
Not only that, but the galaxies should look enlarged due to an illusion caused by the expansion. They do not. (also refutes the Big Bang)
Not only that, but the early universe has an abundance of heavy elements, especially nickel (also refutes the Big Bang).
And there is more yet.

Apparently, there are all these anomalies that are being discovered.

An anomaly is just evidence which refutes all the false theories of evolution and billions of years.
Click to expand...
You're spamming me, you gave me this crap in another thread

You did not even address my post

I put it to you that your God us clearly nuts

Are you going to respond by asking me about the first ever creature, in your usually shoddy fashion?
 
SavedByTheLord

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Eddi said:
You're spamming me, you gave me this crap in another thread

You did not even address my post

I put it to you that your God us clearly nuts

Are you going to respond by asking me about the first ever creature, in your usually shoddy fashion?
Click to expand...
There was more info added including the link to the you tube video.
 
Kelly of the Phoenix

Kelly of the Phoenix

Well-Known Member
YoursTrue said:
No, @SavedByTheLord is not bearing false witness even though I do not agree with her(?) about everything she says but when she asks for certain info she's not wrong. Because there is no scientific real answer. No one on earth knows how life started scientifically. Not one person knows. On the earth.
Yes, so what is your answer positively and accurately to what is the answer to what is "the first living creature and where is your calculations?"
Click to expand...
No. Y’all lack imagination. Lots of people grasp the chain of life quite well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top