Rationality
The Grand King of Nothing
I dont eat fish, but it is still strange to see so many die.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Well call it what you like, it won't stop what's coming. The gods have heard the prayers of people who cry out to them for help and deliverence from the world's current state. It won't stop the destruction of the homosexuals either way, and everyone can call it what they like. Gods or circumstance.
So, what's the difference?
Oh my gosh, seriously?
Is this the fault of conservatives or liberals? I need to know, so I know exactly who to blame.
So you have no explanation of what separates you from Pat Robertson. That's all I needed to know.
No your comparing enviromental menaces to homosexuals is gross and unrealistic
Sounds like a job for Captain KickAzz!!!!Is this the fault of conservatives or liberals? I need to know, so I know exactly who to blame.
This isn't punishment, its the fault of the people working at bp. I have worked on a lot of rigs (not offshore), but those people try to rush things and build these rigs as fast as they can. When they try to rush through these things, aloyt of safety steps are ignored. Unfortunatly this is a direct result of mans greed.
Why wouldn't they? Yes that's what I'm suggesting. I don't believe they're powerless. But I realize the skeptics will call it whatever they like. Let them. It doesn't make a difference.
Oh and don't be so fast to rule out the idea of environmentalist whacko terrorists, considering the havoc wreaked by a radical left wing Al Gore groupie just this week at the Discovery Channel headquarters.
Yes. One wacko Al Gore groupie in 20 years means there's a whole army of them just around the corner. I'll be sure to go to bed scared tonight.
No your comparing enviromental menaces to homosexuals is gross and unrealistic
Way to twist a statement - and attempt to evade a politically inconvenient concept.
Are you saying that attacks on oil interests by those opposing this industry are not possible, or even worth considering as a possibility?
If one is truly trying to determine the cause of an event like this, wouldn't one look at all parties who might have an interest in the destruction of an oil rig, in addition to safety compliance or a lack thereof?
And if the media tells you that this was due to safety violations, are you just going to take that as the gospel truth?
Where I come from, we believe and practice a bit of healthy skepticism and we seek first to understand.
At this point, I'm not ruling out safety issues OR something more ominous. I think that's a prudent position.
Ok, ok... I admit my first reaction to the latest oil rig explosion was do to a jerk of the knee, (plus I had a little alchohol buzz). But, if another one blows up then I'm really going start getting suspecious. :sarcastic
I for one am struck by the fact that explosions are generally so rare - and now we've had two in the past few months. The timing is a bit suspect in my opinion.
Wag the dog, baby. Wag the dog.
The timing of two large explosions in the Gulf - after decades of building, production, and thousands of oil rigs, workers, companies, etc working in that area without such incidents - is odd. It's not "typical" or even "likely," based on the history of the industry and the volume of production. Therefore, it's logical to look at both safety issues AND other possibilities, including criminal acts.