• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Anti-Corruption and Public Interest Act

Curious George

Veteran Member
I was just mocking your deflection from the issues Icehorse & I were discussing.
You ignored those entirely to make it about Poco instead.
All in good clean fun.
Lol, i see.

I wasn't trying to make it about any person. I was trying to point out that the issues you were discussing were not addressing actual issues in the bill.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Lol, i see.

I wasn't trying to make it about any person. I was trying to point out that the issues you were discussing were not addressing actual issues in the bill.
So the OP & I were discussing issues, &
you object to that discussion...but only
to my side of it, & for the wrong reason.
How strange.
 

Curious George

Veteran Member
So the OP & I were discussing issues, &
you object to that discussion...but only
to my side of it, & for the wrong reason.
How strange.
I am fine with you discussing issues. However I find you persistence in discussing issues that avoid addressing the OP's OP questionable.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I am fine with you discussing issues. However I find you persistence in discussing issues that avoid addressing the OP's OP questionable.
Well then...you should complain to the OP that he shouldn't
encourage me by responding with keen wit & thoughtful insight.
 

Curious George

Veteran Member
Well then...you should complain to the OP that he shouldn't
encourage me by responding with keen wit & thoughtful insight.
Now you are discussing your issue with my issue with your issue and we still have uet to find any reasonable objection to the bill mentioned in the OP.
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
They're in the business of exercising power.
Spending taxes on weapons lets them project power around the world.
And they could be used for defense too.
This exercise of global of power is rewarded by voters.
And staying in office is the primary goal.

Not buying it. I think greed is a much more parsimonious answer.
 

Nous

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
But as a lawyer, she favors
corruption which benefits her & her profession.

I agree that we need to find ways to reduce lawyering in this country.

Incompetence is rife in both judges & lawyers.

Casinos are far better run than the courts.
I've been in both.

No, our legal system is quite corrupt.
Consider that judges were once practicing lawyers, & will be again.
This incentivizes them to feather their nests.
Geez, it really should be against the rules here to express blatant irrational bigotry toward and denigration of members of a profession.
 

Curious George

Veteran Member
Geez, it really should be against the rules here to express blatant irrational bigotry toward and denigration of members of a profession.
If lawyers do their job well 50% of the people hate them. People dislike lawyers because they don't understand the law. The law should be more accessible, but as conflicts abound and people push for more laws, the law gets complicated and people tend to not think about it until they are already in trouble.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Not buying it. I think greed is a much more parsimonious answer.
I'm more cynical.
I think voters really want to project good (& occasionally revenge) out into the world.
But they & their leaders just muck things up, ultimately perpetrating lots'o evil.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Geez, it really should be against the rules here to express blatant irrational bigotry toward and denigration of members of a profession.
We're so fortunate lawyers are fair game.
I've personally seen & experienced their corruption & destructive incompetence.
They really have become a cancer which drags the country down.
Alas, no reform is on the horizon.
 

Nous

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
If lawyers do their job well 50% of the people hate them. People dislike lawyers because they don't understand the law. The law should be more accessible, but as conflicts abound and people push for more laws, the law gets complicated and people tend to not think about it until they are already in trouble.

I agree with everything you said here. Yet, in my experience, the bigots who make idiotic "lawyer jokes" invariably deny that their irrational animus has anything to do with having lost in court.
 
Top