Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
We had a guy who used to walk around our apartment complex on Sunday afternoons playing the bagpipes. :banghead3Majikthise said:Yeah, the pipes rule! Alot of people of people I know have asked me how I can stand listening to that racket, they just don't hear the beauty.
I don't really regard atonal clicking as a riff :sarcasticLuke Wolf said:a machine cannot produce bass riffs anywhere on the same level as...Fieldy can using a real bass guitar.
Techno isn't supposed to produce "riffs." Techno is pure beat. It's dance music. If you want innovative, don't listen to it. But if you just want a strong beat that can carry you along, techno is for you. Mindless fun. It's not thoughtfull or thought provoking, nor is it meant to be.Luke Wolf said:I don't think drum and bass machines are anywhere close to as good as the real thing. I do like trance/techno music once in awhile (depends on my mood), but a machine cannot produce bass riffs anywhere on the same level as Cliff Burton could or Fieldy can using a real bass guitar.
Patently untrue. I hardly consider audigy (nothing records)"mindless fun". Nor is techno "pure beat" by neccessity. The fact that most (popular) techno writers are incredibly lazy with their compositions doesn't reduce the musical validity of techno in the least. You're a bassist, righ Aqualung? Try finding some Grahm Central Station (Release Youself is a fantastic album, a must listen: '72 i think). Although an amazing bassist in his own right, Larry Grahm was quite fond of programing quite complex techno compositions. As was Stevie Wonder, Miles Davis, etc.Aqualung said:Techno isn't supposed to produce "riffs." Techno is pure beat. It's dance music. If you want innovative, don't listen to it. But if you just want a strong beat that can carry you along, techno is for you. Mindless fun. It's not thoughtfull or thought provoking, nor is it meant to be.
Fine. But the techno I like is.:banghead3mr.guy said:Patently untrue. I hardly consider audigy (nothing records)"mindless fun". Nor is techno "pure beat" by neccessity.
Or Les Claypool.Luke Wolf said:I don't think drum and bass machines are anywhere close to as good as the real thing. I do like trance/techno music once in awhile (depends on my mood), but a machine cannot produce bass riffs anywhere on the same level as Cliff Burton could or Fieldy can using a real bass guitar.
More complex doesn't mean a better sound. Stairway to Heaven is one of the simpiliest to play, and one of the best sound mellow guitar riffs, IMO.And they can even be far more complex than any human could physically play.
I'd listen.Luke Wolf said:More complex doesn't mean a better sound. Stairway to Heaven is one of the simpiliest to play, and one of the best sound mellow guitar riffs, IMO.
Makes me want to have a "battle of the instruments." I'll play my bass guitar, and a keyboard-techno player making bass sounds will play our best and let a crowd decide which is better.
Why is the keyboardist limited to bass sounds? Why don't you expand the competition to playing keyboard lines on bass? I'm still knocking my head against the wall trying to play "linus and lucy" like Stu Hamm does.Luke Wolf said:Makes me want to have a "battle of the instruments." I'll play my bass guitar, and a keyboard-techno player making bass sounds will play our best and let a crowd decide which is better.
Yep! :biglaugh: But faster or slower depending on the beat. Usually faster.mr.guy said:btw, is this how you dance to it? ->:banghead3