• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

AOC now actively hawking her own political merchandise.

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Socialists like money & the high life too.
While it might look hypocritcial to some, she
does live in a capitalist system. And I heartily
approve of her milking it for personal gain.
Or maybe, contrary to portrayals by conservatives, most of these politicians never proposed a purely socialist system in the first place?
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Yep. Crushing her out of office for good.

Are you another one of her knights in shining armor to defend her, for hopes of her hand to be your mistress? ?
You've said that a couple times, swore she was too unpopular to win reelection, and then she won. By a very comfortable margin.
We can all see, very clearly, if she farts and says excuse me with a weird tone of voice you're going to start a thread complaining about it.
I'll call you a pile of wolf meat if you call me sir ever again. o_O:cool:
I'll call you a pile of stuff using "wolf" like that.:p
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Or maybe, contrary to portrayals by conservatives, most of these politicians never proposed a purely socialist system in the first place?
That definitely. People just don't realize and accept Capitalism is safe and going nowhere with the "Capitalist plus" Democrats who seem to barely lift a finger towards common ownership of the gears of the economy.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Or maybe, contrary to portrayals by conservatives, most of these politicians never proposed a purely socialist system in the first place?
Liberals...conservatives....both tend to eschew dictionaries.
But that's an old argument for another day.
 
Last edited:

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Liberals...conservatives....both eschew dictionaries.
But that's an old argument for another day.

I like capitalism, yet i believe privatizing every aspect of society and then prioritizing profit above all else is a horrible idea, so now I'm magically Marxist? We can't have serious discussions unless we stop humoring ridiculous mischaractizations.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I like capitalism, yet i believe privatizing every aspect of society and then prioritizing profit above all else is a horrible idea, so now I'm magically Marxist? We can't have serious discussions unless we stop humoring ridiculous mischaractizations.
She uses the label, "democratic socialsm", which
suffers from the 2nd word. It creates confusion.
It's also common on the left to leave out the 1st,
"democratic".
All would be wise to be more careful in speech.
 

PoetPhilosopher

Veteran Member
It is absolutely fabulous on pizza.
Especially with feta instead of that loser mozzarella.

Eh, I can take you making objective comments about Dems, AOC, and other people from my side. Politics. Religion. How my momma dresses me. But if you diss my mozzarella, you get the tail ;) :

download (6)~2.jpeg
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
She uses the label, "democratic socialsm", which
suffers from the 2nd word. It creates confusion.
It's also common on the left to leave out the 1st,
"democratic".
All would be wise to be more careful in speech.
Being black and white about it doesn't work. Left/Right just is not synonymous, interchangable, or comparable to "white/black," "day/night," or other such strict binaries we like to impose.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Being black and white about it doesn't work. Left/Right just is not synonymous, interchangable, or comparable to "white/black," "day/night," or other such strict binaries we like to impose.
Whuh?

Anyway, "welfare capitalist" would be better.
After all, if it's about keeping capitalism,
& supporting social welfare, then the word
"socialism" is unnecessary at best.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Whuh?

Anyway, "welfare capitalist" would be better.
After all, if it's about keeping capitalism,
& supporting social welfare, then the word
"socialism" is unnecessary at best.
Not really. Even in some communist and Marxist circles socialist democrats are viewed as a "steeping stone" towards a communist state.
 

Meow Mix

Chatte Féministe
How has no one included her own response?

“Not sure if you knew this Sean [Spicer], but transactions aren’t capitalism.

Capitalism is a system that prioritizes profit at any & all human/enviro cost.

But fwiw our shop is unionized, doesn’t operate for profit, & funds projects like free tutoring, food programs, & local organizing.”
 

PoetPhilosopher

Veteran Member
How has no one included her own response?

“Not sure if you knew this Sean [Spicer], but transactions aren’t capitalism.

Capitalism is a system that prioritizes profit at any & all human/enviro cost.

But fwiw our shop is unionized, doesn’t operate for profit, & funds projects like free tutoring, food programs, & local organizing.”

Thanks for that.

I didn't fact-check myself, just because people create new propaganda threads faster than you can fact-check, anyway.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
She uses the label, "democratic socialsm", which
suffers from the 2nd word. It creates confusion.
It's also common on the left to leave out the 1st,
"democratic".
All would be wise to be more careful in speech.
Not only a label, she is actually a member of the Democratic Socialists of America. Same as Bernie Sanders.

There is nothing at all democratic about this organization. It's a flat out threat to people's freedoms and liberties.
 
Top