exchemist
Veteran Member
If so, you can bet they are applied more rigorously since the Capitol Riot.I think those restrictions were in place long before Trump made the scene.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If so, you can bet they are applied more rigorously since the Capitol Riot.I think those restrictions were in place long before Trump made the scene.
Yes. That's sensible givin the past events, but you cant deny for this particular case, it was just children singing the Star Spangled Banner.If so, you can bet they are applied more rigorously since the Capitol Riot.
Oh, the moral OUTRAGE!I generally like The Hill as a source. From the linked article..
'Capitol Police say singers from Rushingbrook Children’s Choir from Greenville, South Carolina, were stopped May 26 because of a miscommunication. Musical performances in the hallowed seat of Congress require permission, and police said officers had been unaware that the choir had approval from the House speaker.'
What ad hominems? Do you think "pointing things out" is an ad hominem?I'm not the ones starting the debate with the usual ad hominem attacks directed me by essentially the same people.
Pointing things out isnt ad hominem. Pointing at me personally , it certainly is.What ad hominems? Do you thinking "pointing things out" is an ad hominem?
Define "ad hominem", then. Because, by your own definition, what you're doing to me now is an ad hominem.Pointing things out isnt ad hominem. Pointing at me personally , it certainly is.
Define "ad hominem", then. Because, by your own definition, what you're doing to me now is an ad hominem.
Be careful, she will throw her toys down, stomp out and put you on ignore for disagreeing!Definition of AD HOMINEM
appealing to feelings or prejudices rather than intellect; marked by or being an attack on an opponent's character rather than by an answer to the contentions made… See the full definitionwww.merriam-webster.com
And all I did was make a thread on children being stopped from singing the Star Spangled Banner at the Capitol by the police, and expressed my dissatisfaction over it.Be careful, she will throw her toys down, stomp out and put you on ignore for disagreeing!
No, there is one "story", there are just a whole load of claims, allegations and speculation surrounding it. The question of it being stopped because "some people might find it offensive" (note, distinct from "deemed offensive") is a later third-hand claim with absolutely nothing backing it up. It also simply doesn't make any sense.There are two variations of the story if you read multiple sources. It's why the title mentions both.
My response was due to your choice of comments in the OP, which appears to assume the "deemed offensive" narrative and blames it on "the government" despite it involving Capitol police and individual politicians.You need to actually attention for once because you clearly don't read titles and sources, and just spew out whatever goes on inside your head without any basis.
And all I did was make a thread on children being stopped from singing the Star Spangled Banner at the Capitol by the police, and expressed my dissatisfaction over it.
So, not a thing that I've done, then.Definition of AD HOMINEM
appealing to feelings or prejudices rather than intellect; marked by or being an attack on an opponent's character rather than by an answer to the contentions made… See the full definitionwww.merriam-webster.com
Capitol Police stop a youth performance of the ‘Star-Spangled Banner’
Videos of a children’s choir singing the national anthem in the U.S. Capitol spread across social media Friday, with the claim that they showed the group being unceremoniously cut off by federal authorities because the performance was deemed offensive. (June 2)(AP video by Farnoush Amiri)www.usatoday.com
Capitol Police stopped a children’s choir from singing the national anthem. Why?
Video of a children’s choir singing the national anthem in the U.S. Capitol, only to be unceremoniously cut off by police, spread across social media on Friday.thehill.com
How absolutely wonderful we have the government we have today.
Warms the cockles of heart doesn't it?
The debate is clearly between people who love this country and those who don't. It's just that simple.
Capitol Police say singers from Rushingbrook Children’s Choir from Greenville, South Carolina, were stopped May 26 because of a miscommunication. Musical performances in the hallowed seat of Congress require permission, and police said officers had been unaware that the choir had approval from the House speaker. Capitol Police denied choir leaders’ claims that the performance was stopped because it might be found offensive.
After stopping by Wilson’s office for photos, the group went on a tour of the Capitol that ended in Statuary Hall, famous for housing a collection of statues donated by each of the 50 states, where the choir began to perform. A visitor guide asked if they had permission for the show, Rasbach and Rea said, and told them they could start singing once he conferred with someone else.