How does this predict Bahaullah, precisely? In context:
"I must bear the indignation of the Lord,
because I have sinned against him,
until he takes my side
and executes judgment for me.
He will bring me out to the light;
I shall see his vindication.
Then my enemy will see,
and shame will cover her who said to me,
“Where is the Lord your God?”
My eyes will see her downfall;
now she will be trodden down
like the mire of the streets.
A day for the building of your walls!
In that day the boundary shall be far extended.
In that day they will come to you
from Assyria to Egypt,
and from Egypt to the River,
from sea to sea and from mountain to mountain.
But the earth will be desolate
because of its inhabitants,
for the fruit of their doings."
This doesn't say anything. Countless "titanic upheavals" have occurred in human history.
Clever but transparent way to pre-empt criticism of vague prophecies.
Without even googling, two of these are immediately obviously incorrect. First, there was already a schism early in Baha'i, when some followers of the Bab refused to accept Bahaullah as a Prophet. A remnant of them still exist today.
Secondly, many transitional hominid fossils have been found.
So that's two gone from the list - again, without even googling a thing yet to verify what was actually predicted and what actually happened.
Now - do you really want me to do that, knowing that at first glance the list is already fallacious?
It's very bizarre for you to claim that whether a prophecy actually comes true has no relevance to whether we should believe it or not.
But it does matter if it's vague or specific. If I anticipate that I'll die someday, that's nothing to write home about. If I predict the precise manner of my death in advance, down to the day, hour, and minute, and a method which I don't control, that's a significantly more impressive prediction.
Same with Bahaullah's prophecies, evidently.
