Yesterday I was speaking with someone at an employment agency, more or less. I had worked with the company before and so it wasn't unknown that I'm transgender. This person I hadn't ever met before though.
They seemed to be "confused" that I'm female, looked pretty androgynous but that I was wearing "guy's" clothes. I had blue jeans, a t-shirt, a red plaid over shirt and boots on. Apparently where pockets are determine the sex of your button ups and women don't ever wear real boots.
I told them that everything but the t-shirt was gifted to me in the past and I just don't own much of any other clothes at the moment. Only afterwards did I think to quip maybe if I got this new job I'd be able to afford to look more feminine haha.
No... but really I don't understand why clothes has to be "sexed" if that makes sense. I did and will point out now that women wear dude's clothes all the time. Honestly men's clothes tends to be cheaper and some things like boots and jeans are much more suited for being outdoors than women's (I mean actually outdoors as in nature or muddy sides of roads ect) and not every female on the planet is a shut in particularly in rural areas like where I live and not everyone has cars. As far as shirts I get women's cuts if I can but that's not always an option.
So I'm kinda left wondering what's feminine in people's perceptions. Is it just the cut of the clothes or is it more so the style of the clothes? In a society where styles are increasingly androgynous does someone's clothes really matter for how you perceive them to be either feminine or masculine?
More over; styles change over time and what's considered masculine or feminine. Boys used to wear dresses and girls used to wear pants. High heels used to be worn by cavalry and were later part of men's fashion before it became women's fashion. If it's a conformity to a standard where does that standard end since fashion is always changing?
They seemed to be "confused" that I'm female, looked pretty androgynous but that I was wearing "guy's" clothes. I had blue jeans, a t-shirt, a red plaid over shirt and boots on. Apparently where pockets are determine the sex of your button ups and women don't ever wear real boots.
I told them that everything but the t-shirt was gifted to me in the past and I just don't own much of any other clothes at the moment. Only afterwards did I think to quip maybe if I got this new job I'd be able to afford to look more feminine haha.
No... but really I don't understand why clothes has to be "sexed" if that makes sense. I did and will point out now that women wear dude's clothes all the time. Honestly men's clothes tends to be cheaper and some things like boots and jeans are much more suited for being outdoors than women's (I mean actually outdoors as in nature or muddy sides of roads ect) and not every female on the planet is a shut in particularly in rural areas like where I live and not everyone has cars. As far as shirts I get women's cuts if I can but that's not always an option.
So I'm kinda left wondering what's feminine in people's perceptions. Is it just the cut of the clothes or is it more so the style of the clothes? In a society where styles are increasingly androgynous does someone's clothes really matter for how you perceive them to be either feminine or masculine?
More over; styles change over time and what's considered masculine or feminine. Boys used to wear dresses and girls used to wear pants. High heels used to be worn by cavalry and were later part of men's fashion before it became women's fashion. If it's a conformity to a standard where does that standard end since fashion is always changing?
Last edited: