Why do you assume that I'm assuming?
Here's a thought: if it's not difficult for you, explain it to us. What does it mean for something to exist, but neither physically nor merely as a concept in one's mind?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Are God Concepts Incoherent?
- Thread starter Left Coast
- Start date
Why do you assume that I'm assuming?
Here's a thought: if it's not difficult for you, explain it to us. What does it mean for something to exist, but neither physically nor merely as a concept in one's mind?
An idea of what God is, or a definition.
TheTruthReaper
Member
Why do you assume that I am assuming that you are assuming?
TheTruthReaper
Member
Are you saying I am not as wise as you?
Because your question asked why I'm assuming something. Care to answer my question that's relevant to the thread?
Nope.
TheTruthReaper
Member
So how am I assuming anything about you if I ask you why you are assuming anything about me?
TheTruthReaper
Member
Then why did you say to me if it was not too difficult for me?
TheTruthReaper
Member
My questioning that to which you stated as the truth is relevant to what you said.
Therefore if what I said is not relevant to the thread then neither is what you said.
Oh dear. You asked:
"Why do you assume it is difficult for anyone other than yourself?"
That question assumes that I do so. Similar to asking, "Why do you beat your wife?" There's an assumption implicit in the question.
Do you see now?
Any answer to my question relevant to the thread?
Incorrect. The topic of the thread is whether god concepts are coherent.
So let's cut to the chase. I don't need to assume the question is difficult for you at all. If it's not, please explain it to us, so we may all learn.
TheTruthReaper
Member
I guess it was too difficult for you to
comprehend what I stated to you.
For you failed again to answer the question.
Because if you understand the concept, I'd like it explained. Since that's the topic of the thread.
TheTruthReaper
Member
No you are incorrect.
I guess so. Instead of talking about what either of us assume, could you just answer the question related to the OP?
TheTruthReaper
Member
I just commented on your comments.
TheTruthReaper
Member
I guess it was too difficult for you to see that to which was obvious to me about you.
You should get it since I pointed it out to you.
Do you need me to help you understand it?
Okay, so do you not have an explanation for how something exists non-physically and non-conceptually?
Yes. Please help me understand how something can exist, but neither physically nor just conceptually.
TheTruthReaper
Member
Yes I have one but it will be too difficult for you to understand.