• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Are many people only focusing on the "negative" in religions?

Cooky

Veteran Member
I find it much more common that people focus on the positives of their own religion and on the negatives of other religions.

VERY few people dwell much on the negatives of their own religion or the positives of others.

This is generally true.
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
I welcome scrutiny of me as a person and if I speak with others from Falun Gong practice I accept they might understand the teaching better then I do. That I have no problem with.

Where I struggle to understand is when people try to make scrutiny of a teaching they them self do not know or practice, but they read something they find to be " negative" so they really digg deep to ask as many "negative" questions as possible. And when someone from that practice can no longer answer " to satisfaction" to the one who scrutinise their belief, the person who ask suddenly conclude that the teaching is false or evil. Even before they have actually understood why the teaching say as it does.

But yes in RF there will be discussion and debate, that is why we are here. But maybe people would learn more from asking in a more positive way? Like, why do you practice this way or what does this mean to you in your understanding.
I’ve seen people do that in the DIRs if that makes any difference?
 

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
Are you following a true religion or spiritual practice?
Falun Gong is spiritual practice/ cultivation path, not a religion. But I know some people insist it is a religion, but our teacher say cultivation, because we cultivate mind and body, and not base everything on faith :)
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
In discussion we often find people only focusing on what they feel or think is "negative" of any religion or spiritual teaching.....................................Why the negativity?

To me much negativity is because of false religious teachings.
Especially with the clergy of Christendom ( so-called Christians) who teach a literal hell fire.
When King James translated the word Gehenna into English as hell fire that is what helped put flames in biblical hell.
Gehenna was just a garbage pit outside of Jerusalem where things were destroyed.
This ties in with Psalms 92:7 that the wicked are destroyed forever.
So, the Bible's hell has No flames, No burning, No roasting.
Dead Jesus was Not in burning flames when dead Jesus went to biblical hell - Acts 2:27.
Jesus taught ' sleep ' in death at John 11:11-14.
Jesus was well educated in the old Hebrew Scriptures which also teach 'sleep ' in death - Psalms 115:17; Isaiah 38:18; Ecclesiastes 9:5
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Why the negativity?
We can get the positive without the negative baggage. Religion has been providing it for a very lomg time. So much that contemporary religion has separated itself from much of its past ways to conform to todays understandings and knowledge. But bad thoughts that are having consequences for others still exist. Prejudice still lingers, while potentially dangerous medical treatments and pidgeon holing people are still widely practiced today. Just as prejudice and segregation was widely practiced and legally permitted yesterday (still today, but it has been dealt many blows).
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
Are you sure there are such 'true' religious and spiritual practices? Or are there merely comforting ones?

Both according to the teachings of Jesus.
Jesus taught that Scripture is 'religious truth ' - John 17:17.
The resurrection hope gives 'comfort ' - There is going to be a resurrection - Acts of the Apostles 24:15
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
Both according to the teachings of Jesus.
Jesus taught that Scripture is 'religious truth ' - John 17:17.
The resurrection hope gives 'comfort ' - There is going to be a resurrection - Acts of the Apostles 24:15

Of course, that only pushes the question back one step.
 

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
To me much negativity is because of false religious teachings.
Especially with the clergy of Christendom ( so-called Christians) who teach a literal hell fire.
When King James translated the word Gehenna into English as hell fire that is what helped put flames in biblical hell.
Gehenna was just a garbage pit outside of Jerusalem where things were destroyed.
This ties in with Psalms 92:7 that the wicked are destroyed forever.
So, the Bible's hell has No flames, No burning, No roasting.
Dead Jesus was Not in burning flames when dead Jesus went to biblical hell - Acts 2:27.
Jesus taught ' sleep ' in death at John 11:11-14.
Jesus was well educated in the old Hebrew Scriptures which also teach 'sleep ' in death - Psalms 115:17; Isaiah 38:18; Ecclesiastes 9:5
I do agree that in mostly all spiritual practices today we can find people who teach others in a wrong way, could be lack of knowledge or understanding of the teaching by the one teaching?
 

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
1: my focus is toward getting positive to be main focus of all religions or spiritual practice. But to do that one has to ask about why some people only see negativity in religion.

2: personally I have to focus on being more positive toward every being then I managed to be this summer. I got a bit of work to do too.


Here's an example.

Say John says god murder's women and children. He says because of this, god is not a good guy. He says this because of his experience with god (with whom he once believed in) and found his heart contradicted with what was written and said in text and speech. While he still had experiences, he also has a right to say what was wrong with his religion and why he left. They are justified.

Instead, maybe ask. "What are the truths in the negativity they find in religion?"

"Am I missing something about X religion that thousands of other people point out-am I blind to the opposite side of positivity?"

In other words, am I blinded by the light? Can I learn from others with different experiences than I have?

-

Two things come to mind:

For example, John believes murdering women and children is wrong. How can a "spiritual person" dismiss this fact in light of a spiritual experience?

How does spiritual experiences or enlightenment excuse murder because the people who said it wasn't spiritually enlightened themselves?

How does spiritual experiences justify negativity that may be true about religions (if we step out of the light) regardless of our spiritual experiences (in other words-can people get out of their cognitive dissonance with their own religion?)

Also, saying "why people see the wrong in religion" is almost dismissing that there religion and religious experiences aren't perfect. Enlightenment isn't being lifted but being balanced.

In other words: Don't people who view negativity in religions have a point?
 

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
Here's an example.

Say John says god murder's women and children. He says because of this, god is not a good guy. He says this because of his experience with god (with whom he once believed in) and found his heart contradicted with what was written and said in text and speech. While he still had experiences, he also has a right to say what was wrong with his religion and why he left. They are justified.

Instead, maybe ask. "What are the truths in the negativity they find in religion?"

"Am I missing something about X religion that thousands of other people point out-am I blind to the opposite side of positivity?"

In other words, am I blinded by the light? Can I learn from others with different experiences than I have?

-

Two things come to mind:

For example, John believes murdering women and children is wrong. How can a "spiritual person" dismiss this fact in light of a spiritual experience?

How does spiritual experiences or enlightenment excuse murder because the people who said it wasn't spiritually enlightened themselves?

How does spiritual experiences justify negativity that may be true about religions (if we step out of the light) regardless of our spiritual experiences (in other words-can people get out of their cognitive dissonance with their own religion?)

Also, saying "why people see the wrong in religion" is almost dismissing that there religion and religious experiences aren't perfect. Enlightenment isn't being lifted but being balanced.

In other words: Don't people who view negativity in religions have a point?
Yes they have a point in that we who practice a spiritual teaching would benefit from asking our self deep question about our way of practicing, and about our way of understanding the teaching.
It is the one who practice that is the one who should ask themselves the questions for gaining deeper wisdom.

In my understanding, when a non practitioner of a religion ask negative questions, it is not for learning but to get the practitioner to fail and "admit" that maybe e his or her spiritual belief is bad or wrong
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
I do agree that in mostly all spiritual practices today we can find people who teach others in a wrong way, could be lack of knowledge or understanding of the teaching by the one teaching?
In Scripture Jesus agrees with the ^ above ^ because Jesus forewarned that MANY would come in his name but prove false - Matthew 7:21-23.
As the people migrated away from ancient Babylon they took with them their false religious ideas and practices and spread them world wide.
They helped create a greater religious Babylon, or Babylon the Great.
This is why we see so many similar or overlapping religious ideas and practices throughout the world today.
 

Quintessence

Consults with Trees
Staff member
Premium Member
In my understanding, when a non practitioner of a religion ask negative questions, it is not for learning but to get the practitioner to fail and "admit" that maybe e his or her spiritual belief is bad or wrong

Some folks are of a competitive disposition and need to feed that by repeatedly seeking one up on others. It's not something I understand myself, but it's a thing. Usually I just bow out of those conversations quickly. They can fight with other competitively disposed people for their satisfactions.
 
Top