1: my focus is toward getting positive to be main focus of all religions or spiritual practice. But to do that one has to ask about why some people only see negativity in religion.
2: personally I have to focus on being more positive toward every being then I managed to be this summer. I got a bit of work to do too.
Here's an example.
Say John says god murder's women and children. He says because of this, god is not a good guy. He says this because of his experience with god (with whom he once believed in) and found his heart contradicted with what was written and said in text and speech. While he still had experiences, he also has a right to say what was wrong with his religion and why he left. They are justified.
Instead, maybe ask. "What are the truths in the negativity they find in religion?"
"Am I missing something about X religion that thousands of other people point out-am I blind to the opposite side of positivity?"
In other words, am I blinded by the light? Can I learn from others with different experiences than I have?
-
Two things come to mind:
For example, John believes murdering women and children is wrong. How can a "spiritual person" dismiss this fact in light of a spiritual experience?
How does spiritual experiences or enlightenment excuse murder because the people who said it wasn't spiritually enlightened themselves?
How does spiritual experiences justify negativity that may be true about religions (if we step out of the light) regardless of our spiritual experiences (in other words-can people get out of their cognitive dissonance with their own religion?)
Also, saying "why people see the wrong in religion" is almost dismissing that there religion and religious experiences aren't perfect. Enlightenment isn't being lifted but being balanced.
In other words: Don't people who view negativity in religions have a point?