OOH Not so! The plural form for just one individual is brand new.So are you going to use my correct pronouns which have been used as singular since the 1300s or no?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
OOH Not so! The plural form for just one individual is brand new.So are you going to use my correct pronouns which have been used as singular since the 1300s or no?
Thank youOK There it is. I think that they do that! They seem to be downplaying their intelligence.
Like a split personality. Right?
Lol it can beNot funny! The truth is never funny. Right?
That might be Good News!Lol it can be
Like my mind, the meaning of "they" has been expanded.LOL I do not know how to make singular plural.
It's not been used as a singular pronoun until very recently.LOL I do not know how to make singular plural.
As far as I know, from those I have debated and seen these are faulty understandings of grammar. Like some poem about men marching off to war that uses they to refer to this group, though some of the pro-singular-they crowd misread this to be singular.So are you going to use my correct pronouns which have been used as singular since the 1300s or no?
"They" is the new standard.It's not been used as a singular pronoun until very recently.
Not sure why that was adopted instead a neutral singular word like das. Works better and makes more sense to me.
That's beautiful.As far as I know, from those I have debated and seen these are faulty understandings of grammar. Like some poem about men marching off to war that uses they to refer to this group, though some of the pro-singular-they crowd misread this to be singular.
And the English we know today is not the English they spoke and knew in the 1300s.