Augustus
…
And 'yellow journalism' -- sure, that's always been around, but just compare a newspaper written fifty years ago to a newspaper today, even one online. Newspapers, both physical and digital, have been shrinking and providing shoddier and shoddier journalism. They rarely publish local news (which is to say the news most likely to affect the paper's readers), preferring exclusively national and international news because it's easier to plagiarize from other papers/journals. Even the most inflammatory papers in the past bothered to write compellingly -- now many articles look like they've been composed by an AI.
Some newspapers are operating with 1/10th of the staff they had a couple of decades ago which means they do very little reporting.
They don't plagiarise national/international news, they get it from news agencies like Reuters or AP.
Much of the rest of their content comes from PR sources (can be up to 80-90% of some sections), writing up media releases or commenting on press conferences, etc.
Investigative journalism is very expensive (maybe even 100k+) and there is no way to recoup the cost based on clicks rather than paper sales. Meanwhile, opinion pieces and clickbait can generate just as many clicks and cost next to nothing.
This is simply a consequence of the economic realities of running a paper in the internet era where people are unwilling to pay for the news they consume.