Shad
Veteran Member
Olivia Newton John is going down the track that I would prefer.
She is getting Chemo too. She has always had modern medical practices in her treatment in all 3 cases.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Olivia Newton John is going down the track that I would prefer.
From scripture it seems our individual spirit is given to us not from our physical bodies, but instead from God. That our souls, which is the outcome of our spirit in our bodies, then isn't just a physical thing at all, but instead something else. Something that isn't wiped out (or not during the first death) when the body is destroyed (like in a fire, etc.).I’m pretty sure God did not intend for an atom to be split. But we did it and look what happened. Do scientists try to mess with things that shouldn’t be messed with? I mean cloning a human, how do you they figure that can work? In my opinion God is the only One who can create life. I believe in the soul. How can a soul be cloned. I picture a twisted messed mass of cells tissue devoid of a conscience or soul that has no moral compass or sense of right or wrong. Scary...super soldiers? Thoughts?
Sure, but the poster specifically mentioned "fueling stars".While true, there have been natural fission reactors.
If you happen to live till the middle of this century or beyond (I wont), you might have to change your views. Cloning would be done. Yes, there will be failed experiments, but failed experiments do not stop the advance of science. It is a bit of surprise that people are still sticking to the idea of God and Soul.I believe in the soul. How can a soul be cloned. I picture a twisted messed mass of cells tissue devoid of a conscience or soul that has no moral compass or sense of right or wrong.
The origin of life is not the foundation for biology (which includes evolution). Plenty of scientists are working on abiogenesis, and are not quick to divorce themselves from it...please provide your evidence of scientists 'quick to divorce themselves' from abiogenesis.Not in that one important area that they are so quick to divorce themselves from....abiogenesis.The "sticking it to creationists" as far as evolution goes, is like pointing to an elaborate building and admiring the architecture, but not noticing that it has matchsticks for foundations. Would you risk your life in a building like that? Not me.
Equally.....what if God showed up tomorrow and asked what kind of morons would assume that all that exists in the universe is just a monumental accident?
What does "natural" mean in that context...? Please explain.
Upset?Would it unsettle you to know that alternative therapies have a better success rate,
Karma.I’m pretty sure God did not intend for an atom to be split. But we did it and look what happened.
The origin of life is not the foundation for biology (which includes evolution). Plenty of scientists are working on abiogenesis, and are not quick to divorce themselves from it...please provide your evidence of scientists 'quick to divorce themselves' from abiogenesis.
As has been explained numerous times, the origin of life is a separate question from the evolution of life once it has started. Those who study evolution don't need to know how life started to understand how it has changed over time in response to the various selection pressures of the environment in which it exists. There seem to be a fair number of chemists, biochemists, biologists, geologists and others who are NOT divorcing themselves from abiogensis, but are studying how it might have happened. Saying "God did it" is not scientific, and it isn't much help in understanding the universe.
To bat the rhetorical question back at you in a vain hope of your actually trying to answer...what if God showed up tomorrow and asked what kind of morons would ignore or deny all the evidence that exists that the Earth is billions of years old, and the universe billions of years older than that, that life occurred however it did on Earth billions of years ago and has been evolving in response to the selection pressures of the environment for all those billions of years? What kind of morons, God asks, refuse to accept the evidence that intelligent investigation of the universe reveals about the universe?
Then god answered, "I'll tell you what kind of morons they are, the correct morons. They may be morons, but they're correct that I accidentally created the universe and all of existence."Equally.....what if God showed up tomorrow and asked what kind of morons would assume that all that exists in the universe is just a monumental accident?
Reposting in case anyone missed it. There is a reason we have medicine and "alternative medicine." Any day I'll take a couple pills over chewing tree bark and a cocktail of herbs. Real medicinal light treatments over supernatural energy.Do you know what they call alternative medicine that works?
medicine
Did God the human male build a machine, or did God the human male lie about ownership of everything in the Universe?I’m pretty sure God did not intend for an atom to be split. But we did it and look what happened. Do scientists try to mess with things that shouldn’t be messed with? I mean cloning a human, how do you they figure that can work? In my opinion God is the only One who can create life. I believe in the soul. How can a soul be cloned. I picture a twisted messed mass of cells tissue devoid of a conscience or soul that has no moral compass or sense of right or wrong. Scary...super soldiers? Thoughts?
Did God the human male build a machine, or did God the human male lie about ownership of everything in the Universe?
And to answer his own question, male human, when you build a machine and press the buttons and then say and now you own it......he means, and after I changed you...for he does not speak on behalf of God, yet pretends he did.
Present in a conscious thought is a bio male life human thinking, living in a gas metallic radiated body, as the heavens claiming what God the stone is not as a physical body....as present state, right now.
Why he wants God to be the heavenly spirit, non physical and he wants our physical life included in his machine theories to be totally removed forever.....why he says self human is God.
So if you say to a scientist, proven as a male to have lived before on Earth and all his broken up machinery found deep inside of the Earth body, for he churned Earths physical form in space, by pretending that God was his machine. Just as he does today.
A male says I know that before anything existed, I existed as consciousness, meaning just his male human thoughts, who changed the Universe, with a big bang.
Because I know all about it and blamed God.
Said that self was against God existing as O stone...and said self was a Satanist, and Satan the God bodies as Suns that fell into black holes in deep empty space was what he wanted to copy.
Knew stone was a held frozen body....knew that Suns were self consuming and destructive....so he tried to convert Earth into being a Sun. As no male can talk about God or Universal history and knowledge of unless the previously stood on the created Planet as a male and as a scientist, knowing that they activated the big bang blast.
And that blasting of God was stopped....so he wants to restart it with his new time machine that says as a theory....when no Universe existed....when in reality everything exists. Now you should all realize why a male pretends that he is God...for he does not want the real God O a stone body to exist and even confessed that he can de materialize it.
First he tells everyone in science that the Earth came out of the Sun as stone, and now he tells everyone that the Earth began as the big bang blast, that has not yet happened. But in the instance that it occurred then Earth was suddenly present.
Meaning I am thinking actually.
Real status I have no quoted answer as a smart retort to what you said, and so instead will attack your personal self status.....a norm for a lying male mind/psyche.You are completely incoherent.
Real status I have no quoted answer as a smart retort to what you said, and so instead will attack your personal self status.....a norm for a lying male mind/psyche.
Males claim that as a human they are speaking on behalf of God all states in the Universe....yet you are just a human like everyone else who can think.
The answer of a male in science, no I am proven right...by building a machine and attacking/forcing change to natural....told you I can destroy.
So he says Big bang, knows that if he could big bang in his machine as the Universe did, then the Big bang that occurred exactly where he said it did...the Universe would destroy him.
Stephen Hawking said it was the collapse of the Sun into black holes.....the angels of God that fell into the deep pit as a God science statement. And held frozen, the attack of star fall, if it gets reactivated as big bang history will burn us to death, Satanist.
Are politicians 'playing God' when they pass laws that make differences in peoples' lives, good or bad? How about educators, are they 'playing God' by instilling new knowledge into the minds of the next generation? A businesses 'playing God' by buying and selling property and ideas?
So, what's the common element here? I'd say it's people with power tend to play God, and all of them should be suspect, at least until they can demonstrate the pragmatic basis for their proclivity to play God.Good point. And in my opinion I would say yes.