Are there any Flat Earth believers here?

[Subduction Zone]

Would you agree that diseases are caused by microorganisms?

He forgot that yesterday he referred to the Law of biogenesis. No formula there either. There are countless "laws" without formulas. But to try to claim that no formula voids laws the day after trying to use a law without a formula tells us that he does not understand his own weak attempts at refutation. He is merely parroting various creationist sources.

 

[Subduction Zone]

“None needed”

No explanation needed for evolution! I rest my case.

View attachment 24936

Please, you shoot yourself in the foot in every post that you make.

My suggestion, stay away from handguns if you value your toes.

 

[siti]

He forgot that yesterday he referred to the Law of biogenesis. No formula there either. There are countless "laws" without formulas. But to try to claim that no formula voids laws the day after trying to use a law without a formula tells us that he does not understand his own weak attempts at refutation. He is merely parroting various creationist sources.

Agreed - and of course there is absolutely no question that parrots evolved from fish

 

[Tazarah]

He forgot that yesterday he referred to the Law of biogenesis. No formula there either. There are countless "laws" without formulas. But to try to claim that no formula voids laws the day after trying to use a law without a formula tells us that he does not understand his own weak attempts at refutation. He is merely parroting various creationist sources.

Yes, I mentioned the law of biogenesis. The law that states no living thing can come from a non-living source.

I mentioned that because NO LIVING THING HAS EVER CAME FROM A NON-LIVING SOURCE.

Lol!

 

[siti]

Yes, I mentioned the law of biogenesis. The law that states no living thing can come from a non-living source.

I mentioned that because NO LIVING THING HAS EVER CAME FROM A NON-LIVING SOURCE.

Yes - we're still waiting for the formula.

 

[Tazarah]

Yes - we're still waiting for the formula.

The formula = no living thing has ever came from a non-living source.

Some things don’t need a formula, like how you don’t need a formula to tell you that the sky is blue.

But fish turned into humans? LOL

 

[Subduction Zone]

Yes, I mentioned the law of biogenesis. The law that states no living thing can come from a non-living source.

I mentioned that because NO LIVING THING HAS EVER CAME FROM A NON-LIVING SOURCE.

Lol!

Nope you misunderstood that law too. It says that life such as mice, rats, even bacteria which are much more complex than you realize, cannot come from a non-living source.

When you are totally ignorant of the sciences you will always lose. Where is the formula for the law that you did not understand?

 

[Subduction Zone]

The formula = no living thing has ever came from a non-living source.

Some things don’t need a formula, like how you don’t need a formula to tell you that the sky is blue.

But fish turned into humans? LOL

View attachment 24940

You can't refute that which you do not understand. You can only make yourself look foolish.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Once again, the scientific method:

 

[Truly Enlightened]

I could say the exact same thing to you. However, the difference between you and I is the fact that I actually have facts to substantiate my claims.

— If the Earth were truly a sphere 25,000 miles in circumference, airplane pilots would have to constantly correct their altitudes downwards so as to not fly straight off into “outer space;” a pilot wishing to simply maintain their altitude at a typical cruising speed of 500 mph, would have to constantly dip their nose downwards and descend 2,777 feet (over half a mile) every minute... Otherwise, without compensation, in one hour’s time the pilot would find themselves 31.5 miles higher than expected.

No, it is your selective understanding of the facts that makes you different. What is it that aircrafts need to overcome in order to stay airborne? What is it that prevents aircrafts from reaching escape velocity, or entering outer space? You ignore the fact that every aircraft has a ceiling limit(less air, less lift, less oxygen, less thrust). You ignore that all planes have longitudinal static corrections, which means pilots don't need to make corrections. You completely ignore or understand the underlying science behind all plane's Inertial Navigation and Global Positioning Systems. You ignore the overwhelming effect that gravity and the spin of the earth has on the plane. Finally, a stable flight always includes maintaining the balance between Gravity and Lift, not simply traveling in a straight line.

Maybe you can answer me this? The earth is spinning(flat or spherical) at 1000mph, and the speed of sound(flat or spherical) is 770 mph. If I were standing next to someone near the edges of a flat earth, would I be able to hear any sounds either of us could make? You most certainly may be able to substantiate your claim that the earth is flat, but definitely NOT by using any unbiased objective interpretation of the facts.

 

[Tazarah]

No, it is your selective understanding of the facts that makes you different. What is it that aircrafts need to overcome in order to stay airborne? What is it that prevents aircrafts from reaching escape velocity, or entering outer space? You ignore the fact that every aircraft has a ceiling limit(less air, less lift, less oxygen, less thrust). You ignore that all planes have longitudinal static corrections, which means pilots don't need to make corrections. You completely ignore or understand the underlying science behind all plane's Inertial Navigation and Global Positioning Systems. You ignore the overwhelming effect that gravity and the spin of the earth has on the plane. Finally, a stable flight always includes maintaining the balance between Gravity and Lift, not simply traveling in a straight line.

Maybe you can answer me this? The earth is spinning(flat or spherical) at 1000mph, and the speed of sound(flat or spherical) is 770 mph. If I were standing next to someone near the edges of a flat earth, would I be able to hear any sounds either of us could make? You most certainly may be able to substantiate your claim that the earth is flat, but definitely NOT by using any unbiased objective interpretation of the facts.

Regardless of whether or not the pilot makes the corrections themselves or by using their instruments — are you saying that pilots constantly dip the nose of their aircraft downwards to descend 2,777 feet (over half a mile) every minute to prevent the aircraft from increasing in altitude due to the “curving earth” peeling away from underneath them as they travel through the air?

 

[Subduction Zone]

View attachment 24941

You do realize that that cartoon is a lie itself, don't you?

How do you think that you can refute science with lies and idiocy?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Regardless of whether or not the pilot makes the corrections themselves or by using their instruments — are you saying that pilots constantly dip the nose of their aircraft downwards to descend 2,777 feet (over half a mile) every minute to prevent the aircraft from increasing in altitude due to the “curving earth” peeling away from underneath them as they travel through the air?

Still having a tough time with the concept of gravity I see.

 

[Tazarah]

You do realize that that cartoon is a lie itself, don't you?

How do you think that you can refute science with lies and idiocy?

Which part of it is a lie?

The part where it says that there are zero fossil records to substantiate the claims of darwinism/macro evolution?

 

[Tazarah]

Still having a tough time with the concept of gravity I see.

What does gravity have to do with that? An airplane already manipulates gravity by flying, how is it possible for some imaginary secondary gravitational force to affect it?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Which part of it is a lie?

The part where it says that there are zero fossil records to substantiate the claims of darwinism/macro evolution?

You mean what part is not. The origin of the universe and abiogenesis are not part of evolution. The fossil record is amazingly rich and fully supports the theory of evolution and creationists cannot explain it.

 

[Tazarah]

You mean what part is not. The origin of the universe and abiogenesis are not part of evolution. The fossil record is amazingly rich and fully supports the theory of evolution and creationists cannot explain it.

Show me the fossil records from fish > ape > human.

Show me ACTUAL fossils of each stage of the “evolution”.

 

[Subduction Zone]

What does gravity have to do with that? An airplane already manipulates gravity by flying, how is it possible for some imaginary secondary gravitational force to affect it?

Wow!

no an airplane does not manipulate gravity.

I can't teach someone with less than a sixth grade level of science understanding that refuses to learn.

 

[Tazarah]

Wow!

no an airplane does not manipulate gravity.

I can't teach someone with less than a sixth grade level of science understanding that refuses to learn.

Then what do airplanes do to gravity? Do they succumb to it?

You criticize everything like a little child and you never give any explanations.

We already know why.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Show me the fossil records from fish > ape > human.

Show me ACTUAL fossils of each stage of the “evolution”.

I can't show you thousands upon thousands of fossils on the internet.

Also, You do not get to make demands until you learn the basics. You keep forgetting that you know nothing and are unable to judge.