So do you think people can believe something without reason??Total failure of logic, trying to look like formal logic/mathematics while obeying the rules of neither.
Your single biggest error, however, is that "not believing" something is not a positive claim of any kind. This is, I've observed, something that theists are congenitally blind to.
Not believing, in other words, is merely the consequence of having no reason to believe. As I discovered early (as did @Revoltingest as he says), just because somebody told me something is NOT a reason for me to believe it. Needs more.
Of course reasons can be wrong, I acknowledge this in the OP by saying for our purposes theism is wrong. There's always a reason, infinite false ones and a true one, do you disagree?Your second error, it's a bit more subtle, is in your notion of a "Reason." The problem, you see, is that such "reasons" can easily be wrong or non-factual. A very good example might be found in the "Heaven's Gate" sect, founded by Marshall Applewhite. Applewhite's followers thought they had a "Reason" in what Applewhite told them. Applewhite, however, simply made the "reason" up, for whatever private purpose he had, which I suppose we can never know, he being dead and all. Along with his followers.
Last edited: