No, I am simply saying she does not want to let someone else use her uterus.
Are you saying she was forced to allow someone else to use her body?
And in the scenario I gave, it is NOT a permanent loss of the kidney either. Suppose that the man wants use of your kidney while it is attached to your body. He is connected to you and using it now.
Do you have the right to request him to stop using your organ?
The man asked.
If I say no, I have that right.
Just as I have the right to refuse a begger money, or refuse to donate money to help people in poverty.
If the man is already connected to my body, it's either that I allowed him, or someone connected him without my knowledge.
If I allowed him, then according to my Bible trained conscience, I should let my yes mean yes.
(Psalm 15:4) . . .He has sworn to what is bad [for himself], and yet he does not alter.
If he forced himself on me without my permission, he has commited a criminal act, and the consequences are not on anyone but him. Removing myself would only be allowing the already existing circumstances to take their course.
Criminal or not, he died as a result of his current circumstances.
If the doctors were the ones that forced him upon me, without either of our knowledge, the same applies.
I did not cause his death, nor kill him. It is his present circumstances that resulted in his death.
I am not responsible for the death of someone who was hit by a car, and died on my pavement, because I did not go out and try to give him CPR, but instead called Emergency.
If I drove the car that plowed into him, then, yes, I am responsible for his death.
Because I do not donate money to help feed impoverished children, in developing countries, does not mean that I murdered those who died.
If you disconnect the man from your body, it will kill him. he just wants to use your kidney for a while. He will die if you refuse.
So. I did not kill him, murder him, nor am I responsible for his death.
People have kidney damage for numerous reasons. I am not to blame for their disease.
Hundreds of people in Africa, Haiti, and other parts of the world want food.
Do you have the right to refuse? Do you have the right to separate him from your kidney?
Yes.
Her losing something isn't relevant. She is tired of letting someone else use it and wants it left alone. She wants her body back.
Tired? She doesn't have her body?
Being tired gives one the right to murder? Well why don't I just go murder my neighbor, becase I am tired of their loud music disturbing my peaceful evenings.
The offspring in her womb is not dying, and does not own her body. She still has her body, that's why they protest. "It's my body, and I can do whatever I want with my body."
What good reason does she have for murdering the offspring, again? Selfishness is not a good reason.
Just like with the kidney. You can keep the man attached to your body and he will live. If you separate him, he will die.
Do you have the right to separate him? I would say yes, absolutely.
You asked that already.
I agree - I have the right to refuse... Absolutely. That's diferent to deliberately murdering someone who isn't nearly dead.
I don't want to be kept on life support. Those who remove me from that support, has not murdered, or killed me. I died naturally. The fetus does not die naturally. It is murdered... in a cruel way... for selfish reasons.
The one who popped the pill, or ripped that life to shreds, is responsible for the death, just like the driver that plowed into the individual.
Yes, some people make mistakes. And sometimes, those that chose to go to term lost their lives because of their choice. That was also a mistake.
"those that chose to go to term lost their lives because of their choice."?
What does that mean?
@TagliatelliMonster since according to you, I am dishonest, and always pretending, you don't want to talk to me.
