GoodbyeDave
Well-Known Member
I'm still waiting for those arguments for atheism…
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Really. I am finding hard to believe that English is your mother tongue myselfBeing an atheist is either merely believing in gods or not believing in gods. Your argument is rather poor. This is why it is a good idea to understand the meaning of words.
Being an atheist isn't a point of view either. It just describes all people who don't subscribe to a theistic point of view.Being a mammal isn't a point of view - atheism is.
Really? You do not understand how to use so many terms properly and you make that accusation against me?Really. I am finding hard to believe that English is your mother tongue myself
None needed. Check out the concept of the Null Hypothesis:I'm still waiting for those arguments for atheism…
Ask Frank Schaeffer that. He identifies as an atheist who believes in god.So if someone who believes in gods identifies as an atheist, then they really are an atheist?
That's your opinion.Being an atheist isn't a point of view either. It just describes all people who don't subscribe to a theistic point of view.
No, that is the definition. One can go by only the etymology of the words and see that.That's your opinion.
Who is Frank Schaeffer?Ask Frank Schaeffer that. He identifies as an atheist who believes in god.
Whether a person acknowledges their characteristics doesn't change those characteristics.You are the type of person that wants to impose things on people and therefore take away there choice in the matter. There are plenty of people who lack belief in gods who do not identify as an atheist.
Why don't you identify as an atheist?I am one of them. But against our will you wish to impose that label or identity on all of us. You do not get to do that.
It's only useful when held in contrast to theism, but theism is prevalent enough that simply not being one of them is meaningful and useful information.If you want to identify as an atheist then you are free to do so, but you do not get label other people thus against their will which you are doing. Atheism is an opinion, it is a point of views at least and at most a theory. It is not a practice nor a doctrine nor a state of being. And that is exactly what you are try to make it...a state of being, and in making it the default position of everyone you render the concept useless.
Of course not. Gender identity really is a matter of identity.Now I am going to ask a question would impose a gender upon a person who is either gender-neutral or has not decided which gender they are?
It's also the position that aligns with how you agreed the word is used.That's your opinion.
Ask Frank Schaeffer that. He identifies as an atheist who believes in god.
You are the type of person that wants to impose things on people and therefore take away there choice in the matter. There are plenty of people who lack belief in gods who do not identify as an atheist. I am one of them. But against our will you wish to impose that label or identity on all of us. You do not get to do that. If you want to identify as an atheist then you are free to do so, but you do not get label other people thus against their will which you are doing. Atheism is an opinion, it is a point of views at least and at most a theory. It is not a practice nor a doctrine nor a state of being. And that is exactly what you are try to make it...a state of being, and in making it the default position of everyone you render the concept useless.
Now I am going to ask a question would impose a gender upon a person who is either gender-neutral or has not decided which gender they are?
Atheism is not a state being like being a frog. It is a point of view, an opinion, a position. You do not get to impose a point of view or opinion on a person if they do not hold that point of view. You don't get to call a person a communist just because you think that person is a communist by your redefinition of communism , you can only call that person a communist if that person identifies as a communist if that person openly states that they are communist or they openly practice and preach communism.Excuse me, but I will label you or anyone else as an atheist if I find the hat to be fitting, whether you like it or not.
It is not just atheism though. I will also label you a human being even if you tell me you identify as a frog.
Atheism is not a state being like being a frog. It is a point of view, an opinion, a position. You do not get to impose a point of view or opinion on a person if they do not hold that point of view. You don't get to call a person a communist just because you think that person is a communist by your redefinition of communism , you can only call that person a communist if that person identifies as a communist if that person openly states that they are communist or they openly practice and preach communism.
Who is Frank Schaeffer?
What kind characteristic is atheism? Behavioral?Whether a person acknowledges their characteristics doesn't change those characteristics.
Why don't you identify as an atheist?
It's only useful when held in contrast to theism, but theism is prevalent enough that simply not being one of them is meaningful and useful information.
It's like other words we commonly use. Take "civilian:" it just means "a person who isn't in the military." Can you tell why someone isn't in the military just from the fact they're a civilian? No... but we still find the distinction useful.
Of course not. Gender identity really is a matter of identity.
Try reading this again:What if a person is in favor of state ownership of all means of production but calls himself a libertarian ? Should I call him a libertarian because he labels himself that way or should I label him a communist because he fits the description?
I would do that latter. It is the same way with atheism.
you can only call that person a communist if that person identifies as a communist if that person openly states that they are communist or they openly practice and preach communism.
Try reading this again:
From what I can glean from the article, it sounds like his book title is more about sensationalism and novelty than accuracy.
It's an absence of beliefs in gods. The term just describes someone who isn't a theist.What kind characteristic is atheism? Behavioral?
Atheism and agnosticism aren't mutually exclusive. People can be both.Because I am an agnostic.
I have no idea what you're talking about.Is it important to make a distinction between those who believe Vin Diesel is a good actor and those who don't?
Please tell us what you think this "point of view or opinion" is that you think atheists hold.So is a persons opinions or beliefs. Atheism isn't an act, it isn't a practice or behavior, it isn't a state, it isn't a doctrine or religion it is at least point of view or opinion that people hold or at most a theory about certain metaphysical concepts. You don't get to impose your opinion as to what I believe or don't believe upon me. This isn't 1984 and you are not Big Brother.
Actually, you do get to do this.You don't get to call a person a communist just because you think that person is a communist by your redefinition of communism , you can only call that person a communist if that person identifies as a communist if that person openly states that they are communist or they openly practice and preach communism.
Atheism and agnosticism aren't mutually exclusive. People can be both.
Atheism is the view that there is no gods.Please tell us what you think this "point of view or opinion" is that you think atheists hold.
Reread the last six words.Actually, you do get to do this.
Communism is an economic and political system. Anyone who adheres to it - including people who don't say that they're communists - is a communist.