Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Did you miss the qualifiers in that post?Is this your opinion or sonething you can support with evidence?
I can give some evidence but it is not conclusive. For example the evidence supports the claim that he would not have been taken down from the cross. He would have been left up. The Romans did not cater to the religious niceties of the peoples that they conquered. Leaving bodies up on the cross was part of the punishment of crucifixion. It acted as an object lesson for others. A rather grisly one.
The writers of the Bible may have been confused because if the Jews had been the ones that crucified him, and they used that punishment too, then they would have taken him down for the high holiday.