anotherneil
Well-Known Member
In this video, Aron Ra discusses observation of macroevolution:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
And?He's ugly.
Exactly.And?
His wife dosent think so.He's ugly.
Wow, I notice that this is your first post on RF, and at this point still your only post.He's ugly.
How much does beauty have to do with knowledge?He's ugly.
Wow that's pretty deep.How much does beauty have to do with knowledge?
Don't be ridiculous. It wasn't meant to be deep. The poster attacked a well-educated, intelligent individual with the remark "He's ugly," which has precisely zero bearing on the topic under discussion. Such remarks simply deserve to be called out for what they are.Wow that's pretty deep.
He's so good at explaining.In this video, Aron Ra discusses observation of macroevolution:
It's because of Aron that I learned of cladistics. Also his debates with Kent Hovind are absolutely priceless.He's so good at explaining.
"that is all Ye know on earth,How much does beauty have to do with knowledge?
I've listened to his discussion with "Dr. Dino" about 85 times at this point. It never gets old!It's because of Aron that I learned of cladistics. Also his debates with Kent Hovind are absolutely priceless.
I guess it was a swing and a miss - beauty? Ugly? Pretty (deep)? Eh? ... Eh?Don't be ridiculous. It wasn't meant to be deep. The poster attacked a well-educated, intelligent individual with the remark "He's ugly," which has precisely zero bearing on the topic under discussion. Such remarks simply deserve to be called out for what they are.
Believe me my popcorn was extra buttery watching the exchanges as religion, namely ahem...'Dr' Kent Hovind dropped dead in complete ignorance and knowledge.I've listened to his discussion with "Dr. Dino" about 85 times at this point. It never gets old!
...but knowledgeable.He's ugly.
The wiki article on "ad hominem" should link to this post as a reference.He's ugly.
Technically that's just a statement & one could categorize it as a non sequitur or irrelevant statement. If someone were to say something like "he's wrong because he's ugly" (or even "he's right because he's ugly"), then that would be an ad hominem fallacy.The wiki article on "ad hominem" should link to this post as a reference.
Yes.Technically that's just a statement & one could categorize it as a non sequitur or irrelevant statement. If someone were to say something like "he's wrong because he's ugly" (or even "he's right because he's ugly"), then that would be an ad hominem fallacy.
Believe me my popcorn was extra buttery watching the exchanges as religion, namely ahem...'Dr' Kent Hovind dropped dead in complete ignorance and knowledge.