Article, “Internal Proofs of Bible Authenticity”

[clara17]

What "hoaxes of evolution"? Please remember when you make such a charge the burden of proof is upon you. I know of two. That does not seem like a lot compared to the millions of fossils that support evolution. And also this is very very poor reasoning on your part. If you think that Christianity is without hoaxes you are incredibly mistaken. Those are endless. You may not even know what a hoax is.

Christianity is about faith not proof. "science" is about proof. Here are a few of the countless hoaxes by scientists who are "different from most people"

 

[clara17]

It's called the theory of evolution for a reason. If you don't think that flora and fauna change over time to adapt to changing circumstances, you "have your head in the sand".

i dont know if you read any of the prior posts, this is not the topic at all

 

[jimb]

i dont know if you read any of the prior posts, this is not the topic at all

Then why did you bring it up in post #290?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Christianity is about faith not proof. "science" is about proof. Here are a few of the countless hoaxes by scientists who are "different from most people"

That is fine. One can be a Christian by faith. But even so it is silly to claim that God is a liar. There are no "internal proofs" that have been shown for the Bible. We know that Genesis is a book of myths, morality tales, and fables. The events in it did not happen.

 

[IndigoChild5559]

Christianity is about faith not proof. "science" is about proof. Here are a few of the countless hoaxes by scientists who are "different from most people"

Confidence is science is not the same as confidence in scientists. Yes, there are some researchers who commit fraud. And you know what happens? The truth will out. Their studies will not be able to be replicated. And when that happens people will look more closely at their data, and figure out how they manipulated the statistics, or even simply lied. That's what makes science so wonderful.

 

[jimb]

Christianity is about faith not proof. "science" is about proof. Here are a few of the countless hoaxes by scientists who are "different from most people"

I don't know how many times I have to point at that the New Testament is all about faith, i.e., having peace with God through Jesus Christ and knowing (not believing) that what the Bible says, confirmed by our own experiences, is 100% true. There are all kinds of cynical doubters who, not having faith, try to argue that it isn't fact because it can't be scientifically proven. To me, that is idiotic.

 

[Jayhawker Soule]

There are all kinds of cynical doubters who, not having faith, try to argue that it isn't fact because it can't be scientifically proven. To me, that is idiotic.

There are also all kinds of intelligent and informed people that tire of seeing reason ignorantly dismissed as cynicism by those securely ensconced in the embrace of idiotic gullibility. I guess we both have our crosses to bear.

 

[clara17]

Then why did you bring it up in post #290?

In response to the ridiculous statement that scientists are 'different from most people' and can be blindly trusted

 

[clara17]

That is fine. One can be a Christian by faith. But even so it is silly to claim that God is a liar. There are no "internal proofs" that have been shown for the Bible. We know that Genesis is a book of myths, morality tales, and fables. The events in it did not happen.

Dont say "we know" when you mean, "I believe". You dont speak on anyone's behalf

 

[clara17]

Confidence is science is not the same as confidence in scientists. Yes, there are some researchers who commit fraud. And you know what happens? The truth will out. Their studies will not be able to be replicated. And when that happens people will look more closely at their data, and figure out how they manipulated the statistics, or even simply lied. That's what makes science so wonderful.

That was my point from the beginning.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Dont say "we know" when you mean, "I believe". You dont speak on anyone's behalf

I can speak for those that understand the sciences. And no, I do not have mere belief. I can demonstrate how we know that there was no flood of Noah. I only have to ask one simple question: Is God a liar?