Blackheart
Active Member
But it does. He is pointing out the pronounciation as 'tAmato' as opposed to 'tOmato'.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Article: USA changes passports from father/mother to parent 1 and parent 2
- Thread starter Gaura Priya
- Start date
But it does. He is pointing out the pronounciation as 'tAmato' as opposed to 'tOmato'.
Blackheart
Active Member
Language is always going to change so I think everyone needs to get over it but how did this thread become about this? When I read the first entry I thought it was about something totally different.
Blackheart
Active Member
No problem. Ive been amused lol.
Au contraire. You could make a case that it was the English who have run off with the King's English.
It's American English that's the more conservative in many respects. The dropped "R"s were an English affectation -- never caught on in the US -- or in much of Scotland or Ireland either. We still retain the "got/gotten distinction and grammatical number. Even spelling -- The replacement of the original Z with S in words like terrorize and categorize is a recent development.
Last edited by a moderator: