Why do you describe yourself as a secular Hindu?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I believe in keeping politics and religion separate from each other, particularly in Indian democracy. Hence secular Hindu.Why do you describe yourself as a secular Hindu?
What's hinduisms take on souls and identity?You well get my personal answer, but I will provide justification where ever possible. Ask away!
... there is only ultimate substrate, Brahman.
If you want a scriptural quote,I don't really have a question. I'm just giving you a heads-up that I'm stealing your reference to/perspective as Brahman as substrate.
I have no knowledge of Zen meditation, so I won't know.Do you feel that meditation in Zen is similar if not the same as Hindu mefitation?
Hello, sayak83 i am curious about whether or not the Hindu practice includes the raising up of the kundalini, and if so do you generally aspire to gaining the full shakti and shiva energy forms as manifestations above the 1000 petal lotus? The only pictures of this beautiful manifestation that I can find are pictures from christian and pagans.You well get my personal answer, but I will provide justification where ever possible. Ask away!
That practice does exist. However, I do not know much about it as I am not a practitioner of it myself.Hello, sayak83 i am curious about whether or not the Hindu practice includes the raising up of the kundalini, and if so do you generally aspire to gaining the full shakti and shiva energy forms as manifestations above the 1000 petal lotus? The only pictures of this beautiful manifestation that I can find are pictures from christian and pagans.
If you want a scriptural quote,
Brihadaranyaka upanisad
"Ask, Gargi"
2 She said: "I rise to challenge you, Yajnavalkya, with two questions, much as a
fierce warrior of Kasi or Videha, stringing his unstrung bow and taking two deadly
arrows in his hand, would rise to challenge a rival. Give me the answers to them!"
"Ask, Gargi."
3 She said: "The things above the sky, the things below the earth, and the things
between the earth and the sky, as well as all those things people here refer to as past, present, and future—on what, Yajnavalkya, are all these woven back and forth?"
4 He replied: "The things above the sky, the things below the earth, and the
things between the earth and the sky, as well as all those things people here refer to as past, present, and future—on space, Gargi, are all these woven back and forth."
5 She responded: "All honor to you, Yajnavalkya. You really cleared that up for
me! Get ready for the second."
"Ask, Gargi."
"On what, then, is space woven back and forth?"
8 He replied: "That, Gargi, is the imperishable, and Brahmins refer to it like
this—it is neither coarse nor fine; it is neither short nor long; it has neither blood
nor fat; it is without shadow or darkness; it is without air or space; it is without
contact; it has no taste or smell; it is without sight or hearing; it is without speech or mind; it is without energy, breath, or mouth; it is beyond measure; it has nothing within it or outside of it; it does not eat anything; and no one eats it.
9 "This is the imperishable, Gargi, at whose command the sun and the moon
stand apart. This is the imperishable, Gargi, at whose command the earth and the sky stand apart. This is the imperishable, Gargi, at whose command seconds and hours, days and nights, fortnights and months, seasons and years stand apart. This is the imperishable, Gargi, at whose command rivers flow from the snowy mountains in their respective directions, some to the east and others to the west. This is the imperishable, Gargi, at whose command people flatter donors, and gods are de- pendent on patrons of sacrifices, and forefathers on ancestral offerings.
10 "Without knowing this imperishable, Gargi, even if a man were to make of-
ferings, to offer sacrifices, and to perform austerities in this world for many
thousands of years, all that would come to naught. Pitiful is the man, Gargi, who
departs from this world without knowing this imperishable. But a man who departs from this world after he has come to know this imperishable—he, Gargi, is a Brah- min.
11 "This is the imperishable, Gargi, which sees but can't be seen; which hears
but can't be heard; which thinks but can't be thought of; which perceives but can't
be perceived. Besides this imperishable, there is no one that sees, no one that hears, no one that thinks, and no one that perceives.
No idea what you are talking about.These rhythmic statements remind me of the mind trap of religious dogma. The only thing that I know of that qualifies to match all of the weaving of thoughts passing through these disconnecting and reconnecting comments is the line of destiny, that proceeds from the sun to the earth from the earth to all living. Less words more meaning!
Do you feel that meditation in Zen is similar if not the same as Hindu mefitation?
At its most basic, it consists on exercises to train the mind to be capable of reconciling attention with serenity as often as possible.I have no knowledge of Zen meditation, so I won't know.
You well get my personal answer, but I will provide justification where ever possible. Ask away!
Hindus believe that God and other deities sometimes incarnate themselves in human form to perform certain actions for the good of the world. These would be avatars.How does the concept of avatars work?
Another avatar of Vishnu who is supposed to come at the end of this cycle of Earth's existence.Who is the 10th avatar or Kalki?
Some where between panentheism and monism.Are you atheistic, monotheistic, or polytheistic?
Yeah, I too prefer less words, more meaning. Basically, what Yajnavlkya is saying that there is only one thing in the universe (which Hindus term as Brahman) and all the creation is just an expansion of it. Do not confuse that thing with a God because it does not have God characteristics, wanting worship, judging acts of people, coming to help the worshipers in their time of distress, sending them to hell or heaven, etc. It is uninvolved, without form and eternal, does not act in any way but brings up the creation and all happenings just by its existence (this Hindus term as 'maya' - worldly illusion, ignorance of the true state of things). This is what a person should understand in his/her life-time. It is more like a Quantum Mechanics of energy.These rhythmic statements remind me of the mind trap of religious dogma. The only thing that I know of that qualifies to match all of the weaving of thoughts passing through these disconnecting and reconnecting comments is the line of destiny, that proceeds from the sun to the earth from the earth to all living. Less words more meaning!
Sayak is busy. It is festival time in Bengal. He must be relaxing after the hectic puja day after going around the Devi pavillions (Pandals), meeting relatives and digesting what he all food he must have ingested during the last nine days. But he will take up your question. However many answers to your question.What's Hinduisms take on souls and identity?
Its incorrect to say that universe was created. The universe "rose up" or "emanated" from Brahman like flower does on the branch of a tree and will sublimate itself back into Brahman at the end of this "season". Next "spring" another universe flower will emerge and so on and on and on.Do you believe that the Universe was created for a purpose or if it was coincidental?