Scarlett Wampus said:
What connection or role, through you or in general, do you see personal mysticism having in the wider world?
I have no clear idea how I personally fit into the game. I sense I have a role but I am not inclined to conjecture what that role might be. I guess my main role is to help to demystify it all for people. There
are altered states of consciousness and I will patiently remind folks of this until I suck in my last breath. The other nugget I will never stop telling people is that they do not need to listen to me, as they need only to listen to their inner selves and before too long they will get the picture.
I guess ideally I would like to put a happy face on mysticism in general with a special interest in inner experience. The point the two converge is where perception meets reality. As long as you do not accept your perceptions as "engraved in stone" and remain flexible to reasoning them out, you will begin to understand how thoughts and beliefs ultimately form the world that is experienced. Ultimately you will take greater care with that which you "think" in the first place. At the end of the road you will begin to sense the unbridled energy that forms those thoughts and beliefs... if you are honest with yourself and reality, that is.
Scarlett Wampus said:
Is there anything you've written or like reading that resembles the core of what motivates you?
There is no way to put icing on this cupcake. You see, my friend, the core of what motivates me resides in the knowledge of what I am. "I" am a personality energy essence that is ensconsed within a physical environment. Now tell me this, why would I waste my time reading about something I can grasp directly? Why sit inside and read about all the wonderful birds there are when I can go outside and look for myself?
In larger terms, and also in terms of altered states of awareness, I can do just that. I close my eyes and I see something that resembles the sun. It has been there a very long time now, so it is a rather unlikely candidate for an illusion. If it is an illusion it is certainly a highly entertaining illusion and one I have learned a great deal from regardless of the fact of its legitimacy or delusion.
I certainly could grasp the rope of delusion and deceit and tell you I have had so-called "revelations" from "god" and that you really ought to listen to me, as I am his holy messenger. Um... but that has been done
and it would be as unseemly now as it was back then. After all, you have no inside information and have either to accept my declaration or deny. Who is to say if I am on the level or not? If I am right, it is not like "god" is going to let you in on the secret.
I am coming to the conclusion that people WANT it all layed out in black and white for them. It is so much easier to pick up a book and go "Ahhh, Option 3 is correct!" Neat. No thinking involved. I guess people have a hard time grasping something that is remarkably simple to do, and they want it more pat and complex. I guess also that they want answers that fall in line with their own preconception about how reality should behave regardless of how it is inclined to behave.
Scarlett Wampus said:
What are you struggling to understand or work with at the moment?
Are you sure you want to know?
Backburner issues:
1) How much of our childhood modes of behavior do we take with us into adulthood. (IE. A quivering lip at age 4 might make people crumble. A quivering lip at age 40 might generate a contemptuous comment.) So, how much do we really change our methods of "getting our way" as we grow up? I suspect that it is less than we might expect.
2) Is the Jewish name of god, phoneticaly, meant as a name or actually as a mantra?
"EE AH OO EH" - when you focus on the Christ and chant this chant in a 'sing-song' fashion letting the sounds echo and morph while retaining their original syllable, after about 20 minutes it is a pretty neat experience, I have my doubts that this is actually a name... but is in fact a mantra of sorts.
For more info... (Note: The website is not intended as a definitive reference on the words.)
3) I am also researching early religion and shamanism to define the point when Matriarical societies became almost instantly Patriarical societies. We followed Mother Goddess images for an awefully long time and then there was a relatively sudden shift away from that thinking. I am tantilized as to WHY that would occur. What happened so long ago that forced women into a second class role... especially when she was the top gun prior to this point? What events occurred that gave rise to notions of Original Sin, Adam and Eve and our alleged "Fall from Grace". I am not sure what happened, but the effects of that/those event(s) are still rippling through our world even today. We have one account, two is you count Islam, of how the story goes... but is that not written from the viewpoint of those who succeeded in ripping power away from the Matriarical leaders? Women have endured so much if all this was was a case of burning the mammoth over the cooking fires. I suspect an error was made by the women and unwittingly stumbled upon by men. It involves deception about the abilities of the women and how some areas were the sole province of the female seers.
4. What am I going to make for dinner tonight. :faint: