• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Assange says It's Not Russia

ShivaFan

Satyameva Jayate
Premium Member
https://www.rt.com/news/365164-assange-interview-wikileaks-russia/

Statement by Assange today:

“The Clinton camp has been able to project a neo-McCarthyist hysteria that Russia is responsible for everything. Hillary Clinton has stated multiple times, falsely, that 17 US intelligence agencies had assessed that Russia was the source of our publications. That’s false – we can say that the Russian government is not the source,” Assange told the veteran Australian broadcaster as part of a 25-minute John Pilger Special.

.... I agree with Assange. While there were a lot of positives about Tailgunner Joe, he did keep bourbon in his briefcase. So in that, Joe and Hillary have in common - they are both drunks.

Notice I say "are" instead of were. Tailgunner Joe is dead - but still among us as an apparition. If you walk the halls on Congress, you can still smell a faint shine of bourbon.
 

Daemon Sophic

Avatar in flux
https://www.rt.com/news/365164-assange-interview-wikileaks-russia/

Statement by Assange today:

“The Clinton camp has been able to project a neo-McCarthyist hysteria that Russia is responsible for everything. Hillary Clinton has stated multiple times, falsely, that 17 US intelligence agencies had assessed that Russia was the source of our publications. That’s false -- No. That's true. She was citing the report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), comprised of 17 US intelligence agencies, both civilian and military. https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsr...23-joint-dhs-odni-election-security-statement


– we can say that the Russian government is not the source,” Assange told the veteran Australian broadcaster as part of a 25-minute John Pilger Special. ....and he offered what exactly as proof? He is the head of Wikileaks after all. Full transparency and all that.

.... I agree with Assange. ... I'm happy for you both. But that still offers no proof of anything, other than perhaps your own hatred of our next POTUS. Hillary is still both correct and honest in her debate statement. Even if Assange has new evidence, that doesn't retroactively change the report published in October by the ODNI.

While there were a lot of positives about Tailgunner Joe, (there was very little positive about the fear-monger McCarthy. IMO).
... he did keep bourbon in his briefcase. So in that, Joe and Hillary have in common - they are both drunks. ...again with the hatred based upon nothing. Sad.

Notice I say "are" instead of were. Tailgunner Joe is dead - but still among us as an apparition. If you walk the halls on Congress, you can still smell a faint shine of bourbon. Two things. 1. This statement implies that you personally work and walk within the halls of congress in DC. And 2. Hillary no longer works there... so exactly who or what you're sniffing is in question.
 

Daemon Sophic

Avatar in flux
Even if it was Russia, they'd only get a thanks from me.
Now if Hillary wants to win, she has to work for it.
And her future slimy actions will hopefully push the dem party in a better direction (i.e. away from Hillary's side).
Yes. Pushing her to the left would be better for our nation. But we have to remove all the neo-con tea-baggers in the legislature too.....as I indicated in a different OP.
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
Statement by Assange today:
It doesn't really narrow anything down, even if we believe him. Even some contractor from CIA could be doing something illegal by sending stuff to wikileaks(cause its happened before). Nobody wants to get in trouble for something akin to Watergate.
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
“The Clinton camp has been able to project a neo-McCarthyist hysteria that Russia is responsible for everything. Hillary Clinton has stated multiple times, falsely, that 17 US intelligence agencies had assessed that Russia was the source of our publications. That’s false – we can say that the Russian government is not the source,” Assange told the veteran Australian broadcaster as part of a 25-minute John Pilger Special.
His statement doesn't mean we weren't hacked by Russia. The DNC hack was someone breaking into servers and the leaked emails was from Democrat users clicking on a fake gmail giving access to emails for months.
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
17 US intelligence agencies had assessed that Russia was the source of our publications. That’s false – we can say that the Russian government is not the source,” Assange told the veteran Australian broadcaster
What possible reason would anybody have for believing an antiAmerican spy?
He couldn't very well admit anything damaging to Trump.
Tom
 

Milton Platt

Well-Known Member
https://www.rt.com/news/365164-assange-interview-wikileaks-russia/

Statement by Assange today:

“The Clinton camp has been able to project a neo-McCarthyist hysteria that Russia is responsible for everything. Hillary Clinton has stated multiple times, falsely, that 17 US intelligence agencies had assessed that Russia was the source of our publications. That’s false – we can say that the Russian government is not the source,” Assange told the veteran Australian broadcaster as part of a 25-minute John Pilger Special.

.... I agree with Assange. While there were a lot of positives about Tailgunner Joe, he did keep bourbon in his briefcase. So in that, Joe and Hillary have in common - they are both drunks.

Notice I say "are" instead of were. Tailgunner Joe is dead - but still among us as an apparition. If you walk the halls on Congress, you can still smell a faint shine of bourbon.


And where can I see the evidence he has based his assertions upon??? Or is this just a personal opinion?
 
Top