• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Atheism is ILLEGAL?

Matheist

Matheist

http://animist.net
Could it be said that Atheism is unconstitutional and illegal?

The terrorist ideology and doctrines?

PREMISE: God means:

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident...

The Declaration of Independence: Full text

He made all gods same god [LordLaw of Nature & Nature's God]. (Quran 38:5)​

THEREFORE, the definition of Atheism:

atheism /ˈeɪθɪɪz(ə)m/
noun
disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of Nature's God.​

Atheism rejects public policy and the Constitution; of all countries.

Atheism rejects the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, The United Nation.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights

It is the actus reus and mens rea of a criminal.
 
Last edited:
Altfish

Altfish

Veteran Member
Matheist said:
Could it be said that Atheism is unconstitutional and illegal?

The terrorist ideology and doctrines?

PREMISE: God means:

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident...

The Declaration of Independence: Full text

He made all gods same god [LordLaw of Nature & Nature's God]. (Quran 38:5)​

THEREFORE, the definition of Atheism:

atheism /ˈeɪθɪɪz(ə)m/
noun
disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of Nature's God.​

Atheism rejects public policy and the Constitution; of all countries.

Atheism rejects the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, The United Nation.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Click to expand...
Have you ever met and spoken to an atheist. Because you post indicates that you haven't.
 
Matheist

Matheist

http://animist.net
"...a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes..." of respect for Nature's God.

ELSE, criminal.
 
Matheist

Matheist

http://animist.net
The definition of Atheism against Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights:

Article 18. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion (of NATURE'S GOD).

They violate basic human rights and have no respect for all mankind.
 
Yerda

Yerda

Veteran Member
Matheist said:
The definition of Atheism against Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights:

Article 18. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion (of NATURE'S GOD).

They violate basic human rights and have no respect for all mankind.
Click to expand...
No, it doesn't. The definition of atheism describes a position protected by article 18.
 
osgart

osgart

Nothing my eye, Something for sure
So by your definition of criminal, free thought and free conviction is not allowed, and all must conform to a God they see none evidence for. Warped sense of justice that is you got there. Its the kind of justice that starts unnecessary wars with those they disagree with.
 
Matheist

Matheist

http://animist.net
osgart said:
So by your definition of criminal, free thought and free conviction is not allowed, and all must conform to a God they see none evidence for. Warped sense of justice that is you got there. Its the kind of justice that starts unnecessary wars with those they disagree with.
Click to expand...

You have rights, but your rights cannot violate the universal rights... and:

"...a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes..." of respect for Nature's God.

This clearly against the universal rights:

disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of Nature's God.​

It makes void and violates the Constitutional Rights and The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It is not rooted in science, logic, philosophy, fact etc but mere disbelief and opposition, ie. a Troll.
 
PureX

PureX

Veteran Member
The answer is 'no', because the ability and the right to be an atheist is just as naturally innate (god-given) as any other. And this right did not have to be specified because the wording, as written, implied that there are other such rights besides those specifically mentioned.
 
Matheist

Matheist

http://animist.net
PureX said:
The answer is 'no', because the ability and the right to be an atheist is just as naturally innate (god-given) as any other. And this right did not have to be specified because the wording, as written, implied that there are other such rights besides those specifically mentioned.
Click to expand...

Then it makes the Constitutional Rights and The Universal Declaration of Human Rights as useless.

disbelief /dɪsbɪˈliːf/
noun
refusal to accept that something (the Constitutional Rights and The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Nature's God) is true or real.

Without belief of the Constitutional Rights and The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Nature's God
 
Liu

Liu

Well-Known Member
"When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation."
English is not my native language and I'm not from the U.S., but I understand that as:
If you want to create a new government, like those other governments which both the Law's of Nature and the God of Nature have allowed to exist, then it would be quite respectful that you explain why you need a new government and not stay with your old one.

Nothing about having to believe in that deity, nor even anything applying to the common citizen, just about the founders of a new government.

Also, you can believe in Nature's God from a deistic perspective, i.e. see it as a personification of the universe and not an actual being.
 
Matheist

Matheist

http://animist.net
Liu said:
"When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation."
English is not my native language and I'm not from the U.S., but I understand that as:
If you want to create a new government, like those other governments which both the Law's of Nature and the God of Nature have allowed to exist, then it would be quite respectful that you explain why you need a new government and not stay with your old one.

Nothing about having to believe in that deity, nor even anything applying to the common citizen, just about the founders of a new government.

Also, you can believe in Nature's God from a deistic perspective, i.e. see it as a personification of the universe and not an actual being.
Click to expand...

It defines and established the meaning of God as "Nature's God". All mankind agree with this as it can be found in all religious texts. It is the validity for anything to be called God.

THEREFORE, the definition of Atheism:

atheism /ˈeɪθɪɪz(ə)m/
noun
disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of Nature's God.
 
Last edited:
osgart

osgart

Nothing my eye, Something for sure
Forcing someone to believe something is like trying to tell an orange to be an apple because orange's are evil.

You are indoctrinated into a religion i consider menacing to call atheism illegal.

Imagine that, honesty is illegal!

Atheism is on the rise and one day you will be a minority of something outdated. Or would you jail 500 million atheists.

Demographics of atheism - Wikipedia
 
Matheist

Matheist

http://animist.net
Jaiket said:
Not at all. Atheism is protected under freedom of religion by the UN, US and any sane system of laws.
Click to expand...

It is freedom to make void the others. There is nothing in the Atheism says it is rooted from science, logic, philosophy, facts etc. What kind of freedom is this?
 
Matheist

Matheist

http://animist.net
osgart said:
Forcing someone to believe something is like trying to tell an orange to be an apple because orange's are evil.

You are indoctrinated into a religion i consider menacing to call atheism illegal.

Imagine that, honesty is illegal!

Atheism is on the rise and one day you will be a minority of something outdated. Or would you jail 500 million atheists.

Demographics of atheism - Wikipedia
Click to expand...

That's your opinion and have nothing to do with the following definition:

disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of Nature's God.​

Can you understand its argument?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top