I was looking more for the reasons why they believe what they believe. Some evidence and or logic to support it.
That is a bit too vague. What do you mean by evidence and logic?
But that was based entirely on your belief being true. It is only more logical if I already accept that you're right.
No, that is based upon logic. It is not logical to believe in a religion that has scriptures that were written thousands of years ago because those scriptures were written for people living thousands of years ago, NOT for people living in the present age of reason and science. You should not accept that I am right, you should use your OWN logical reasoning abilities.
Most of what I've said is actually based on what you've said you believe. The rest is about how somebody who doesn't just accept it, is supposed to conclude that it's true.
Nobody who doesn't accept it is supposed to conclude that it's true. They are supposed to do an independent investigation to determine for themselves if it is true or not, and only after they are convinced that it is true should they believe it is true.
No, it isn't. God could 'show up' in some obvious (not but involving its 'full essence') way if it's omnipotent, you already admitted that (
#687) but then said it chooses to only communicate via messengers.
It is irrelevant that God is omnipotent. God is a spirit so God cannot 'show up' such that we can see Him with our physical eyes or hear Him with our physical ears. So what God does is manifest Himself in the person of the Messenger who is also referred to as a Manifestation of God. The Manifestation of God is a Messenger of God, a Servant of God, a Representative of God, and the Voice of God. He has many roles on Earth. Also, it is important to note that He is MORE than just a human, He has a twofold nature, a human nature and a divine nature, and that is why he can understand God and humans and why He has the unique capacity to act as an
intermediary between God and humans. This is logical.
But it's simply not obvious the somebody who doesn't start out with a belief. There is just a cacophony of different religious folk all telling us that they have the truth.
I fully understand that because I did not start out with a belief. You see, I was not raised in any religion or believing in God. I came upon my religion in adulthood and I have to investigate it and determine if it was true or not. It was never an emotional thing for me, it was all based upon information, reason and logic.
I can understand how it would be confusing if you are listening to religious folk all telling us that they have the truth, and that is why you should not listen to other people but rather investigate for yourself to determine what is the truth.
Which makes it even more unjust and unfair. It looks like your god really doesn't like human nature very much. And, of course, if you're lucky enough to be raised in the religion of the latest messenger, you get let off the effort. At the other extreme, it can be very bad for your well-being and even life-threatening to abandon one's faith in some cultures.
Why is it unjust or unfair for God to expect effort on the part of an atheist or a religious believer and require them to seek and find the latest Messenger if they really want to know the truth?
As I said above, I was not raised in my religion. I was rather fortunate to discover the Baha'i Faith during my first year of college, and probably because I was never a Christian or any other religion I was able to recognize it as the truth. It is more difficult if someone was raised in another religion to shake off those beliefs and become a Baha'i but it is not impossible because most Baha'is were raised in another religion, As for atheists what us difficult for them is that they have no conception of God unless they are raised in a religion such as Christianity, in which case their conceptions of God are going to be distorted.
If I ever said they "found God" I meant that figuratively, not literally, as nobody ever "finds" God. What I meant is that they found a religion whereby they can believe that God exists.
You can't really have it both ways. You can't use the popularity of religious belief in general to show that god and its message aren't hidden (even if it was a valid argument, which it isn't, for the reasons I've explained) if you think most of them have not found the correct message and are not doing what god wants.
I can have it both ways because religious people believe in God even though they do not have the latest message from God.
Also, the latest message from God is NOT hidden, it is all over the internet! I understand that unless people have a reason to search for the Baha'i Faith they would not be looking for it, but once they have been told about it it is not difficult to research it.
You are correct in saying that most of them have not found the correct message and are not doing what God wants, but who is to blame for that? If they never heard of the Baha'i Faith we could say that the Baha'is are to blame fro not getting the message out, but once people have the message the ball in in their court because all humans have a brain to think and free will to choose what to believe.