• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Atheists: A Question About Newborn Kittens.

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
I'm not paying a subscription for that. According to the Cambridge dictionary there is an implicit understanding that it is a human concept. It cites two examples:


"Atheism as we know it did not exist until modern times."

"He uses science to support his own brand of materialistic atheism."

atheism


Cats existed in pre modern times. So they weren't atheist back then?

Google search results for "define _____" uses the OED, no subscription required.

Are you saying the word wasn't coined until recently (18century), im pretty certain there were people who lacked belief in gods at least as far back as early modern humans and early cats
 

Secret Chief

Vetted Member
Google search results for "define _____" uses the OED, no subscription required.

Are you saying the word wasn't coined until recently (18century), im pretty certain there were people who lacked belief in gods at least as far back as early modern humans and early cats
Oh, It wouldn't let me past a pay wall thing.
Anyhoo, a different question:
Cats lack belief in the fairness of capitalism. Does this mean cats are therefore socialists?
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Oh, It wouldn't let me past a pay wall thing.
Anyhoo, a different question:
Cats lack belief in the fairness of capitalism. Does this mean cats are therefore socialists?

When i ask Google for a definition the definition from OED is returned top of the page,

Eg,

atheist​

/ˈeɪθɪɪst/

noun
a person who disbelieves or lacks belief in the existence of God or gods.


Any cat who wants to call this house their home better be socialist

And i lack belief in the fairness of capitalism despite running an internationally acclaimed company.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
I'm certainly done with rocks and kittens.

What about a rockin' kitten?

1704144726727.png
 

Secret Chief

Vetted Member
The words atheist / theists typically applies only to humans who can actually understand what the terms mean and the (non-)beliefs represent.

But strictly speaking, yes: every entity that does not believe in gods, is atheist.
I think my take is that for a being to be considered atheist it can only be after said being has (or has the potential to) given consideration to the notion that god/s exist. Hence kittens, hamsters and worms are not contenders, imo. (And as for rocks, ie all matter, ie the universe, is just plain silly).
 

TagliatelliMonster

Veteran Member
I think my take is that for a being to be considered atheist it can only be after said being has (or has the potential to) given consideration to the notion that god/s exist. Hence kittens, hamsters and worms are not contenders, imo. (And as for rocks, ie all matter, ie the universe, is just plain silly).
I don't think I agree with that.

I can imagine an isolated tribe of humans who live in harmony with nature which for some reason never developed, or came into contact with, theistic beliefs or god concepts. So if you would tell them about gods or such beliefs, they'ld have no idea what you are talking about.

I'ld call those humans atheists. Simply because they lack any beliefs to qualify as theists.

So the way I see it, atheism is a default position.

You need to actually do something, believe / make specific claims, in order to qualify as a theist.
You don't need to do anything at all to qualify as an atheist.

You are an atheist by default.
You require additional, specific beliefs / actions to qualify as a theist.


The strict definition of "atheist" is "without personal god beliefs".
So anyone without such beliefs, is an atheist by definition.

We are all "a-globdycok-ists". Eventhough nobody claims globdycoks exists or even know what they are.
We all lack believe in such anyway.
Because nobody does, we have no use for a word like "a-globdycok-ist". But that doesn't change the fact we all lack positive, affirmative beliefs in globdycoks..
 

Secret Chief

Vetted Member
I don't think I agree with that.

I can imagine an isolated tribe of humans who live in harmony with nature which for some reason never developed, or came into contact with, theistic beliefs or god concepts. So if you would tell them about gods or such beliefs, they'ld have no idea what you are talking about.

I'ld call those humans atheists. Simply because they lack any beliefs to qualify as theists.

So the way I see it, atheism is a default position.

You need to actually do something, believe / make specific claims, in order to qualify as a theist.
You don't need to do anything at all to qualify as an atheist.

You are an atheist by default.
You require additional, specific beliefs / actions to qualify as a theist.


The strict definition of "atheist" is "without personal god beliefs".
So anyone without such beliefs, is an atheist by definition.

We are all "a-globdycok-ists". Eventhough nobody claims globdycoks exists or even know what they are.
We all lack believe in such anyway.
Because nobody does, we have no use for a word like "a-globdycok-ist". But that doesn't change the fact we all lack positive, affirmative beliefs in globdycoks..
Unsurprisingly I pretty much disagree with all of this, given what I have previously said. To label the tribe atheist before and/or after the "explanation" is presumptious. Their religious beliefs may not even have meaning in regard to atheism/theism. I myself do not make use of theism or god concepts but I would not call myself atheist. Funnily enough a few years ago I would have said I was an atheist. Not anymore though, partly because of reading posts by atheists on this forum. I'm not in that camp.
 
Last edited:

TagliatelliMonster

Veteran Member
Unsurprisingly I pretty much disagree with all of this, given what I have previously said. To label the tribe atheist before and/or after the "explanation" is presumptious. Their religious beliefs may not even have meaning in regard to atheism/theism. I myself do not make use of theism or god concepts but I would not call myself atheist. Funnily enough a few years ago I would have said I was an atheist. Not anymore though, partly because of reading posts by atheists on this forum. I'm not in that camp.
I don't think it matters what people "identify" as.

It seems rather simple to me... The meaning of the word is clear: "without beliefs in gods".
So if you are without beliefs in gods, for whatever reason (including not even knowing about gods / god beliefs), you qualify.
 
Top