Atheists believe in miracles more than believers

[Eli G]

Who programs the bots here?

 

[YoursTrue]

Try and "think" and answer the post. Real science takes a minimum of objective independent thinking at the highschool level.

And science really cannot know how life started or see how fish developed legs despite the fossil record. Because it's not there. It's projection based on possibilities and multiple ones at that. It's all projection and conjecture. No matter how well trained a scientist is, they have not seen fish develop legs and lungs and eventually evolved to be humans. Despite the fossil called Tiktaalik. Sorry, it just isn't there, degreed microbiologist or not.

 

[YoursTrue]

Misunderstanding or deliberate ignorance regarding the laws of science is not really something to be proud of

Where's the misunderstanding? That nothing is really something?

 

[Eli G]

Have you seriously believed that someone here is a scientist?

Reading the stupid things they write and of which they seem to be proud makes me feel ashamed for real scientists.

 

[shunyadragon]

There are certain posts here that sound so stupid, that if that's what science is, I'd rather not know anything about that "science".

Like your posts? You have already demonstrated you do not know anything about science.

 

[McBell]

And science really cannot know how life started or see how fish developed legs despite the fossil record. Because it's not there. It's projection based on possibilities and multiple ones at that. It's all projection and conjecture. No matter how well trained a scientist is, they have not seen fish develop legs and lungs and eventually evolved to be humans. Despite the fossil called Tiktaalik. Sorry, it just isn't there, degreed microbiologist or not.

Why is it you do not hold your beliefs to the same rigid standards you hold science to?

 

[shunyadragon]

Where's the misunderstanding? That nothing is really something?

Yes, in physics and cosmology yes, nothing refers to the zero energy state of the smallest scale of the Quantum world.

As far as in philosophy/theology that concept of absolute nothing is absolute nothing.

 

[Eli G]

Besides, the bots that come to respond when there's no one real here are not even able to understand what someone is talking about. They change dialogue like the direction of the wind, lol.

That's why I ignore most of them... and yet they still insist on talking to me. They don't even realize that.

 

[McBell]

Besides, the bots that come to respond when there's no one real here are not even able to understand what someone is talking about. They change dialogue like the direction of the wind, lol.

That's why I ignore most of them... and yet they still insist on talking to me. They don't even realize that.

Has it really been a whole month already?

 

[Eli G]

And I am about to give another two or three months more ... Who wants to talk to stupid bots that all they do is talk nonsense and like each other?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Besides, the bots that come to respond when there's no one real here are not even able to understand what someone is talking about. They change dialogue like the direction of the wind, lol.

That's why I ignore most of them... and yet they still insist on talking to me. They don't even realize that.

No, you pretend to ignore people that demonstrate that you are wrong. But you do not even do a good job at that.

 

[Subduction Zone]

There are certain posts here that sound so stupid, that if that's what science is, I'd rather not know anything about that "science".

To the ignorant that were brought up reading a book of myths and that was about it reality can seem to be stupid.

One trait that you share with other creationists is the fear of learning.

 

[Eli G]

They don't even change the clichés... Is it possible that no one will help these people get out of the rut, and move forward to the next level?

 

[YoursTrue]

Why is it you do not hold your beliefs to the same rigid standards you hold science to?

Rigid standards I hold science to? Like what? showing/demonstrating that fish crawled out of water after they developed legs and lungs and eventually evolved to become humans? If scientists want to test cellular structure, figure out how babies are conceived, that's fine, no problem. Nevertheless, from what I read, bacteria stay bacteria, fish as far as observed by scientists, stay as fish, gorillas remain gorillas. So if science wants to give a person a pig's heart or liver, that's part of their field. It does not justify the theory of evolution, however.

 

[Subduction Zone]

They don't even change the clichés... Is it possible that no one will help these people get out of the rut, and move forward to the next level?

That is because pretty much all creationists are the same. Incredibly ignorant about the sciences and yet still frightened to death of them.

BOO!!

 

[Subduction Zone]

Rigid standards I hold science to? Like what? showing/demonstrating that fish crawled out of water after they developed legs and lungs and eventually evolved to become humans? If scientists want to test cellular structure, figure out how babies are conceived, that's fine, no problem. Nevertheless, from what I read, bacteria stay bacteria, fish as far as observed by scientists, stay as fish, gorillas remain gorillas. So if science wants to give a person a pig's heart or liver, that's part of their field. It does not justify the theory of evolution, however.

And you are still an ape. Your own argument sinks you.

 

[YoursTrue]

They don't even change the clichés... Is it possible that no one will help these people get out of the rut, and move forward to the next level?

No. Not that I have seen. If they want to believe in the theory of evolution, even though bacteria remain as bacteria, fish remain as fish, gorillas remain as gorillas, that's what they think. Oh, and birds remain as birds.

 

[YoursTrue]

And you are still an ape. Your own argument sinks you.

Say you and scientifically oriented categories. You might as well say as some others here do that you're a fish.

 

[Eli G]

They get furious because I dedicated a topic to them where I make them wake up to their own reality: they believe in miracles more than believers themselves.

Believing that life came from things is more miraculous than believing that God shared his life with others.

 

[McBell]

Rigid standards I hold science to? Like what? showing/demonstrating that fish crawled out of water after they developed legs and lungs and eventually evolved to become humans? If scientists want to test cellular structure, figure out how babies are conceived, that's fine, no problem. Nevertheless, from what I read, bacteria stay bacteria, fish as far as observed by scientists, stay as fish, gorillas remain gorillas. So if science wants to give a person a pig's heart or liver, that's part of their field. It does not justify the theory of evolution, however.

So now that you are flat out called out on it you quickly switch from:

"they have not seen fish..." Post #262​

to​

"showing/demonstrating that fish..." Post #274​