Atheists believe in miracles more than believers

[Pogo]

I have rarely if ever seen you give a complete detailed informative answer. Take care.

There is not sufficient detail for you who insists on a million years long videotape or your maybe goddidit is just as good.
You have also never evidenced the ability to remember accurately any detail given you so sorry done wasting time.

 

[SkepticThinker]

I don't know about others. But to imagine that cells popped up out of the blue borders on insanity. Take care.

Who claims they "popped up out of the blue?"

 

[leroy]

Another of your disingenuous loaded questions trying to set up some dichotomy to justify your sky daddy.
We know specific details about how to cut and haul stone using only technology available at the time. We don't have a video to know if we put the foremen in exactly the right place etc, but we know how to build a pyramid without invoking magic.

In fact nobody knows/can built a pyramid with the technology that was available in ancient Egypt................and nobody knows which mutations occured (or could have occured) in order to built an eye

Another of your disingenuous loaded questions trying to set up some dichotomy to justify your sky daddy.

That explains your caution and your unwillingness to address points clearly and directly……………you are afraid of the implication of your comments (which is bad science)

 

[YoursTrue]

But by your own admission you don't read posts that are longer than a few sentences.

I am guaranteeing you if I read something longer than a paragraph or two from you with intricate information you wouldn't be able to discuss it. Take care.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Another example of your lack of knowledge and inability to explain.

LOL He was making a joke.

 

[SkepticThinker]

In fact nobody knows/can built a pyramid with the technology that was available in ancient Egypt................and nobody knows which mutations occured (or could have occured) in order to built an eye

Whaa?

Of course we know. They did it. The pyramids are there. They built them. They didn't have modern technology. Wait, do you think aliens did it?

That explains your caution and your unwillingness to address points clearly and directly……………you are afraid of the implication of your comments (which is bad science)

Wha? Your question was poorly worded. Sorry.

I am guaranteeing you if I read something longer than a paragraph or two from you with intricate information you wouldn't be able to discuss it. Take care.

That ... doesn't make sense.

 

[YoursTrue]

Another of your disingenuous loaded questions trying to set up some dichotomy to justify your sky daddy.
We know specific details about how to cut and haul stone using only technology available at the time. We don't have a video to know if we put the foremen in exactly the right place etc, but we know how to build a pyramid without invoking magic.

Nope you're wrong. Your answer obviously rests on speculation. You and others can accept the speculation or be honest.

 

[YoursTrue]

There is not sufficient detail for you who insists on a million years long videotape or your maybe goddidit is just as good.
You have also never evidenced the ability to remember accurately any detail given you so sorry done wasting time.

If I thought you knew what you so vehemently proclaim I'd say so. You have given no indication that you actually know what you're saying and supporting. Thank you so much!

 

[YoursTrue]

There is not sufficient detail for you who insists on a million years long videotape or your maybe goddidit is just as good.
You have also never evidenced the ability to remember accurately any detail given you so sorry done wasting time.

There are others reading your posts. Nobody sees any knowledge coming out of your posts. Bye for now.

 

[Pogo]

In fact nobody knows/can built a pyramid with the technology that was available in ancient Egypt................and nobody knows which mutations occured (or could have occured) in order to built an eye


That explains your caution and your unwillingness to address points clearly and directly……………you are afraid of the implication of your comments (which is bad science)

@ratiocinator just explained to you why you can't walk from NYC to LA because there are an infinite number of places in between and we don't know every one of them.

That makes about as much sense as your arguments.

 

[leroy]

. Obviously the first few chemicals that came together were not conscious so how did it arise?

Well I think I have the answer, but materialists wont like it

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Well I think I have the answer, but materialists wont like it

Well, thinking is not evidence. So you have do more than think.

 

[Pogo]

LOL He was making a joke.

If I have enough adult beverages I ?

 

[YoursTrue]

Well, how do you know that an evil demon is not tricking you?

Descartes doubted whether what he experienced was real or if he was tricked by an evil demon. He couldn't figure out if it was the one or the other. So he did something else.

I am not tricked but I have known others who think they could have been. What do you mean by your statement that he couldn't figure out if it was the one or the other? If you can't explain what you mean then ok, don't bother.

 

[YoursTrue]

If I have enough adult beverages I ?

See that's your type of answer.

 

[SkepticThinker]

If I have enough adult beverages I ?

Do you have enough to share?

 

[Pogo]

Nope you're wrong. Your answer obviously rests on speculation. You and others can accept the speculation or be honest.

No speculation is what your alternative relies on, we use evidence and logic.

 

[SkepticThinker]

I am not tricked but I have known others who think they could have been. What do you mean by your statement that he couldn't figure out if it was the one or the other? If you can't explain what you mean then ok, don't bother.

How can we verify whether or not a demon is tricking us?

 

[YoursTrue]

Well, thinking is not evidence. So you have do more than think.

Not even to Descartes?

 

[YoursTrue]

No speculation is what your alternative relies on, we use evidence and logic.

Like Descartes did because he thought therefore...he is? Ya think?