Atheists believe in miracles more than believers

[TagliatelliMonster]

"Hybrids" no the kind wolf-dog, tiger-cat, horse-mule, ...
Mythological hybrids of the kind whale-cow, ape-human, fish-bird, ...
Other of these mythological hybrids: cyclops, centaur, dragon, sphinx, mermaid, unicorn, ...
With the same evolutionist reasoning, why not?

Ah, so.... just another strawman then.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Maybe the same you have to believe that there were human-apes... from reading about it?

Or human mammals!

How stupid, right?

 

[shunyadragon]

"Hybrids" no the kind wolf-dog, tiger-cat, horse-mule, ...
Mythological hybrids of the kind whale-cow, ape-human, fish-bird, ...
Other of these mythological hybrids: cyclops, centaur, dragon, sphinx, mermaid, unicorn, ...
With the same evolutionist reasoning, why not?

, , , because it is based on the intentional ignorance of science particularly genetics with an ancient religious agenda.

Hybrids only occur between genetically related species, subspecies and variants. It is actually one of the mechanisms to increase the genetic diversity in a population that is evolving,

Also a flaming strawman!!!!!!

 

[shunyadragon]

The ToE represents a regression in human intellectual progress. It's unreasonable to present a hypothesis as a definitive fact to scientific thinkers and still anticipate that they will maintain their independent judgment and rationality.

The so-called "Theory" is merely a mythological belief system, rooted in the unfounded idea that interspecies hybrids have ever existed. It is misleading for proponents of evolution to assert dominance over believers, as they are essentially enthusiasts of a different creed.

It is your beliefs that a regression in human intellect, and by the actual facts based on an ancient mythical belief system and ancient text without provenance,

 

[shunyadragon]

I don't want anyone to think I have no response to someone's argument. I don't see their arguments because I tire of word games.

You have never provided a coherent argument against evolution based on objective evidence and coherent science. I do not believe you re being honest about being tired of your word games without competent responses.