You're just making it look worse for yourself...have a good one..
umm ok, lol. I love your passive aggressive insults
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You're just making it look worse for yourself...have a good one..
It no longer matters to me, obviously it matters to you, whether you know what fishes specifically morphed or evolved and with definite details through the various stages. From fish to apes...Like I said yesterday and numerous other times, no fish ever morphed into an ape. Maybe you should jot that down and you won't need to ask me again.
Look you can't figure what fish morphed, changed, evolved in little bitty mutations from them through apes so thanks and bye...lol...I found out what I wanted to know.umm ok, lol. I love your passive aggressive insults
umm ok, lol. I love your passive aggressive insults
Look you can't figure what fish morphed, changed, evolved in little bitty mutations from them through apes so thanks and bye...lol...I found out what I wanted to know.
It no longer matters to me, obviously it matters to you, whether you know what fishes specifically morphed or evolved and with definite details through the various stages. From fish to apes...
Irrelevant…….my question is, how do you know that @YoursTrue is a woman?..................remember claims are not evidence (or at least this is what most fanatic atheist from this forum have told me multiple times)
in my experience, that is a very typical thing for internet atheist..................but sure not all atheist........................why is it so hard to admit/point to mistakes...............................obviously the assertion that "claims are not evidnce" is wrong .........atleast soemtimes claims could be evidnceWell, you were not correct about atheists. Can you admit that?
Irrelevant.I see that you still do not understand the burden of proof.
Ok so you have her claim of she being a woman…………………….. but “claims are not evidence” right?There used to be ”Gender” status under each Avatar’s name…I just recalled hers were “female” sign.
LOL! And you still do not understand the burden of proof. Wow! How do you even manage to eat lunch?Irrelevant.
It is still a fact that
1 you and your atheist friends assert that “claims are not evidence”
2 all you have is a claim that @YoursTrue is a woman
3 therefore by your logic there is no evidence that @YoursTrue is a woman
...
The easy solution is to make a self-correction and retreat from you assertion (claims are not evidence)…………….but you won’t do that because admit mistakes is forbidden in your cult
When you own up to the fact that you do not understand the burden of proof I will explain your error to you.Ok so you have her claim of she being a woman…………………….. but “claims are not evidence” right?
Ok so you have her claim of she being a woman…………………….. but “claims are not evidence” right?
impossible. Leroy made no error of logic. None at all.When you own up to the fact that you do not understand the burden of proof I will explain your error to you.
None of that makes evolution (the theory of) true.Btw, @leroy .
How do I know you really are a man, when you could be a woman?
I recalled that you had the “male” sign listed as your gender.
I didn’t lie about my gender when I registered. Did you?
Furthermore, I check yours profile, under the “About” (leroy), and it say it is “male”. But how do I know what you say is true. Your about information also included when you joined RF, plus listed your religion as being a “Christian“. re you a Christian, or are you lying about that.
I am not going to waste my finding “evidence” for something as trivial as a person religion or gender status, not yours, and not YoursTrue…as the profiles don’t include real names. So please stop pestering me about ”evidence” about YoursTrue’s gender.
And lastly, you can always check out @YoursTrue profile for yourself, to see for yourself if she is still a “she”. I don’t need to look, because I am going by memory.
Funniest joke all day.impossible. Leroy made no error of logic. None at all.
Where did you get that idea from? You probably read only a fraction of that article.See? Scientists say (lol) How we evolved into male and female So -- according to some, everyone is MALE --