Clearly, you do not understand a word I have said. It's not about me. Hmmm? Maybe there is another way to bring light.
I understand everything you said; I just do not agree with you.
Your religion wants to condemn, blame, punish. Let's start with that. What is more important to you? Say you had a troubled child making very bad choices. Choice 1. condemn, blame and punish. Choice 2. Fix your child through education.
My religion does not do that; my religion seeks justice and sometimes that requires punishment.
My religion seeks to educate in order to prevent the problems in the first place. It is not an either/or.
You say you demand justice. Is justice really payback for the hurt that was caused? What is more important Payback or fixing the child?
I was not referring to children, I was referring to adults who are FULLY responsible for their actions.
I was not talking about payback, i was talking about justice. Revenge is not necessary for justice but punishment often is.
Do you think trying to alter the actions of another by inflicting pain is really a viable option. Aren't there better ways intelligent people can use? If you attempt to alter other's actions through pain, aren't you teaching them that hurting others to get your way is a viable choice? Do you really want to teach people that?
Punishment for crimes is not teaching them to hurt others, it is teaching them not to hurt others. Punishment needs to fit the crime and it does not involve inflicting pain. What are we supposed to do, reward a murderer for killing someone? Get real.
Your religion claims some people are better than others through their choices. You have evil people and you have good believers. Do your children's actions determine the love you have for them? Why would you think God loves those believers more than those troubled souls choosing hard lessons?
My religions teaches that all people are not equal in the sight of God because people can be good or evil. It has nothing to do with whether they are believers or non-believers. People are who they are according to their actions, and they have free will to choose, so they are fully responsible for their choices, unless they are mentally ill or mentally challenged, or a child under the age of reason.
Your religion says God gave you free will. If God gives free will why would God send a holy book with threats of hell to intimidate your actions? Are threats and intimidation really a higher level?
There are no threats of hell in my holy book, just explanations about how we make our own hell, by our own choices.
Sure, there is some good in holy books. Some of what they say about love is good. On the other hand, the evil and hate they teach is in there as well. They do not realize they do this because they value those petty things and do not realize they are wrong.
No holy book teaches us to hate or do evil, they teach us to love and do good.
I have no idea what you mean by petty things. What is petty?.
God is at a Higher Level above these petty things. That is how I know those messengers do not know God. God isn't going to be doing these things. God isn't going to be teaching people to do these things. Why? Because it is not Intelligent!!
What petty things? Messengers do not teach petty things.
God gave everyone a different view to guaranty mankind a larger view than any one person could have. I bet that Atheist friend of yours can see this in your religion. Widen that view. There is more to see. IT STARES YOU IN THE FACE!!!!
If everyone just did what they pleased, following their own ideas of right and wrong, some people would do good and some would do evil, because without religion there is no guidance at all. The fact that so many people no longer follow the teachings of their religions is why we see evil and chaos in the world today.