Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
But what you are failing to understand Falvlun is that atheists (almost all who I have talked with) state that atheism is by definition without any agenda. This exception proves the rule wrong.
There are sure to be some hidden agendas. I'm sure they realize that their cause is being promoted. Maybe spreading some information and encourage people to come out of the closet, that they aren't the only freethinkers around, and possibly not as small a minority as most suspect.Why? Is there an agenda? Is it just a get together.
Ah. So when a group of Muslims get together and decide that suicide bombings are a good idea, I should assume that means that all Muslims are suicide bombers and suicide bombing is an inherent part of Islam. Gotcha.
I hope you realize how ridiculous your stance is.
By definition, yes, there is no agenda to atheism. (In other words, the definition of atheism isn't: The promotion and spread of the lack of belief that god exists. The definition is simply: the lack of the belief that god exists.)But what you are failing to understand Falvlun is that atheists (almost all who I have talked with) state that atheism is by definition without any agenda. This exception proves the rule wrong.
Precisely.Atheism in and of itself doesn't, but groups of atheists (that don't consist of all atheists) can view atheism as something to be advocated and can have agendas that reflect and further that view.
Your last sentence is just about right. (My only quibble is that atheism, itself, cannot be said to have an agenda.)Using your analogy.
You said:
There are activist Muslims, but that doesn't mean that activism is an inherent part of Islam.
I said:
It does for me.
Thing is, Muslims have about 18,000 other things they do admit to putting forth as part of their doctrine, practice and ongoing worship. Whereas atheists generally want to pretend, "no no no no, no belief system here, no agenda here, none of that applies to atheism. But hey, who's going to the atheism conference next year where we can discuss our lack of beliefs and build a stronger strategy that is truly lasting?"
Atheism may or may not have any agenda, but clearly some atheists do have an agenda for atheism.
That sounds about right. I also wouldn't be surprised if there were talks about atheist discrimination and how to prevent that.There are sure to be some hidden agendas. I'm sure they realize that their cause is being promoted. Maybe spreading some information and encourage people to come out of the closet, that they aren't the only freethinkers around, and possibly not as small a minority as most suspect.
What is this hypocrisy you keep speaking of? Not every atheist is anti-religious and even if they are doesn't mean they don't like being organized. Unless you think being organized equals religion but I wouldn't exactly agree with that. I know you like to say science is religion but I don't agree with that either. Engineering isn't a religion either.Just pointing out the blatant hypocrisy.
That is all.
If you value getting promotions I would recommend not talking about atheism at work. There is a stigma out there and majority of people are theists.That sounds about right. I also wouldn't be surprised if there were talks about atheist discrimination and how to prevent that.
Yos really. The southern states are culturally stunted and starved of diversity and intellectualism.
Also, it's a part of human nature to desire to congregate with like-minded people, so why is it so disconcerting when it's atheists that do it?
What's stopping you?Wish I could bottle this up and use in other threads when some atheist type tries to claim, "but Acim the default position of atheists and free thinkers is we don't have any agenda. Sorry you never understood that."
So the small percentage of atheists that go to conventions proves that atheism has an inherent agenda? Did you read his suicide bombing example? Just because some atheists go to conventions to discuss who knows what(like some muslims like to blow themselves up around other people) doesn't mean all atheists share the same opinions and motives as those at the convention(and not all muslims believe it's ok to blow themselves and other people up). Atheists at the convention are going to have all sorts of differing opinions, interests, ideas, and motives. They are there to discuss different things. Maybe things like the peaceful existence of the various beliefs around the globe, or how we can better our education process here in America. I mean I wouldn't be surprised if they ridiculed Creationism a bit because of the hoopla that's been occurring in some school districts in the past and present, but I don't have a clue what is discussed at these things, and I'm not sure if I'd ever be interested enough to attend one if they had one in Indiana.But what you are failing to understand Falvlun is that atheists (almost all who I have talked with) state that atheism is by definition without any agenda. This exception proves the rule wrong.
Wish I could bottle this up and use in other threads when some atheist type tries to claim, "but Acim the default position of atheists and free thinkers is we don't have any agenda. Sorry you never understood that."
what is our agenda? i'd like to know....
what is our agenda? i'd like to know....
Just pointing out the blatant hypocrisy.
That is all.