Whenever I say that Messengers of God are the evidence of God’s existence atheists say “that’s not evidence.”
First, do you understand why the simple existence of people who claim to speak for God is not actual evidence of God (especially not a specific God)? After all, the are people who claim to be messengers for al sorts of different gods and people who claim to be messengers for the same god yet say entirely different things.
So if “that’s not evidence” what would be evidence of God’s existence?
Haven't you asked this before? I'm sure I've given you this answer before;
That isn't how it works. If you want to propose something, it is on you to define the hypothesis (in sufficient detail) and therefore the consequences you would expect to see if that hypothesis was true (and couldn't be better explained by a different hypothesis). It is the testing of those expected consequences would provide the evidence.
Given there has
still never been a detailed, definitive hypothesis presented for the existence of God, the entire process is deadlocked.
Of course, a lot of the people who do define gods (certainly the mainstream monotheistic ones) specifically define it as something that can't be evidenced or proven, the reliance on faith being the point in the first place. It seems like you're talking about a different type of god to this, all the more reason for you to properly define your hypothesis.
I believe (1) God exists and there is evidence, because if there was no evidence God could not hold humans accountable for believing in Him. Why would God expect us to believe He exists and provide no evidence? That would be unfair as well as unreasonable.
Wouldn't that logic mean it was at least as likely that God doesn't exist (or at least doesn't exist as you're defining it)? You've sort of followed the scientific process I described, hypothesising that if this specifically defined God exists, there must be evidence for it. If you can't identify that evidence, you've successfully disproved your hypothesis and need to go back to the drawing board. That isn't a bad thing, it's a legitimate part of the process.