• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Atheists: What would be evidence of God’s existence?

Tiberius

Well-Known Member
Well, look who the wind blew in, just when I was about to replace my favorite atheist with another atheist. :D
Now you just went to the front of the line.

lol

True, but so what? As long as you reach the right conclusion why would it matter if other people reached the wrong conclusion? Most people are going to reach the wrong conclusion because most people follow the crowd. But you are not responsible for other people, you are only accountable to God for your own belief.

Not everyone shares this point of view. Look at all the wars fought in the name of religious differences, for example.

That is your prerogative.

Can you give me any reason at all why anyone should accept a claim as accurate if the accuracy of said claim can not be shown?

No, but my belief/knowing is not what MAKES it true. It is either true or false. If it is true it would not matter if everyone in the world believed it was false; it would still be true.

Except you can't say it is true, at best, all you can say is that you believe it is true.

You can't say it is true unless you have evidence that shows that it is true, and you've said many times that religion doesn't work that way.

I was not searching for a SUITABLE religion, I was searching for a TRUE religion. The Baha'i Faith certainly is not the easiest religion to belong to. Christianity is a lot easier because all you have to do is believe Jesus died for your sins and you are saved and forgiven. However easy is not always better. Baha’is get more rewards in heaven.

I was not searching for a SUITABLE car, I was searching for the BEST car. That's why I chose a car that I found at the first dealership I looked at. Because there was no way that a car at another dealership could be any better than that one, right?

Religions might lack the things needed to show YOU that they are true, but that does not mean they are lacking in the ability to be believed.

Well yeah, but you've got idiots believing all sorts of nonsense these days. Some idea being believed to be factual doesn't really prove anything. I could say that I can poop gold and there'll be someone gullible enough to believe it, I'm sure.

That is true, that is one way a religion is different from a car, but it is not logical to conclude that ALL religions are bunk just because no tests can be run on them. To conclude that would be the fallacy of jumping to conclusions.

However, without tests, there's no way to show that any particular religion is NOT bunk.

So, with no way to remove a religion from the "bunk" pile, why shouldn't we just keep them there?

No, I started with a community college and then I went to several universities. I as not going to pay more than I had to and that is why I never had any student debt.

Ah, so you didn't stick with the first option. So how is this relevant at all to your search for religion?

I knew which religion I wanted and that was the religion that I determined was true. I wanted it because it was true, NOT because it was comfortable.

Ah, but here's the thing...

If, during the course of your investigation, you started wanting to believe it - just a little bit, maybe even so little that you didn't even notice - then that could have influenced you to be more willing to accept it as true. And the more willing you were to accept it as true, the more you wanted it. So it's a feedback loop that continually reinforces itself until you conclude that it must be true. That is not a logically valid way of arriving at a conclusion, and without peer review, you have no way to prevent such things happening.

I highly doubt that, because there are a lot more cars on the marketplace than there are religions.

Okay then, how many cars are there? I mean, there's only a handful of manufacturers that are manufacturing cars today in a number that makes it likely that the average joe looking to buy a car is going to come across them. And those manufacturers are going to have a limited number of lines. They might have an economy hatchback model, a higher end sedan model, a luxury model, a performance model, a few different types of van, a ute (perhaps with 2 and 4 door variants), an SUV (perhaps one designed for city use but to look cool, and another meant for serious off-roading), and a few different sizes of trucks. And of course, not every manufacturer is going to produce vehicles in every category. Ferrari pretty much deals with the performance model area. Range Rover doesn't really do the small economy hatchbacks. And Isuzu isn't going to be putting out any luxury models any time soon.

Or perhaps you are speaking of the number of individual vehicles that are available to buy. In that case, I think you should count the number of individual believers as well. In any case, the number of religions isn't really going to be overshadowed by the number of cars in the marketplace.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Not everyone shares this point of view. Look at all the wars fought in the name of religious differences, for example.
That’s true. That happened because people were following the teachings of the leaders of the older religions.
Can you give me any reason at all why anyone should accept a claim as accurate if the accuracy of said claim can not be shown?
I guess you are asking why anyone should believe the Baha’i Faith is true if the claim of Baha’u’llah to have received a message from God cannot be proven to be true.
Except you can't say it is true, at best, all you can say is that you believe it is true.
What you are really saying is that I cannot prove that it is true, I can only believe it is true. That is correct because nobody can prove that a religion is true as a fact, they can only prove it is true to themselves.
You can't say it is true unless you have evidence that shows that it is true, and you've said many times that religion doesn't work that way.

I would not say it is true unless I could prove it is true. All I can say is that I believe it is true.
I think that the evidence proves that it is true but that is just my personal opinion.
I was not searching for a SUITABLE car, I was searching for the BEST car. That's why I chose a car that I found at the first dealership I looked at. Because there was no way that a car at another dealership could be any better than that one, right?

Car analogies do not work for religions because religions are not equivalent to cars. You can find cars with the same features at all the dealerships, so it makes sense to compare cars at other dealerships. The same does not apply to religions. There are no other religions that all the features that the Baha’i Faith has so it would not have helped me to look at other religions, since I needed to have the features that only the Baha’i Faith has..

People all choose their cars and religions very differently because humans are all different. Other Baha’is probably looked at other religions before they chose the Baha’i Faith because they were searching for a religion, but I was not searching for a religion so I did not look at other religions. I was attracted to the Baha’i message of the oneness of mankind and world unity, not to the Baha’i religion. I did not even think in terms of religion back then because I was not raised in a religion and I knew nothing about religion.
Well yeah, but you've got idiots believing all sorts of nonsense these days. Some idea being believed to be factual doesn't really prove anything. I could say that I can poop gold and there'll be someone gullible enough to believe it, I'm sure.

That’s true, but I do not think that matters as long as you are not one of those gullible people, and I don’t think you are.
However, without tests, there's no way to show that any particular religion is NOT bunk.

The only tests I know about are the tests of a Prophet I told you about before, but maybe you can devise a test of your own.
So, with no way to remove a religion from the "bunk" pile, why shouldn't we just keep them there?
I think there is a way but you will have to decide for yourself if it is worthwhile to try to remove it from the bunk pile. We all have to decide what is worth our time.

I have lots of piles of bunk in my house but I have better things to do than remove them. I have been under a pile of atheists since I started a new thread three weeks ago, so that has taken all my time. But you know what they say, for everything there is a season. I prayed to God last night to relieve me of all these posts and apparently God heard me because the storm suddenly died down.
Ah, so you didn't stick with the first option. So how is this relevant at all to your search for religion?
I went as far as I could in the community college, which was only two years, so I had to go to other colleges and universities in order to get my bachelor’s degree and later two different master’s degrees.

My college attendance is not really relevant to my search for a religion.
Ah, but here's the thing...

If, during the course of your investigation, you started wanting to believe it - just a little bit, maybe even so little that you didn't even notice - then that could have influenced you to be more willing to accept it as true. And the more willing you were to accept it as true, the more you wanted it. So it's a feedback loop that continually reinforces itself until you conclude that it must be true. That is not a logically valid way of arriving at a conclusion, and without peer review, you have no way to prevent such things happening.
It only matters what actually happened, not what could have happened, and I am the only one who knows what actually happened. Of course if I wanted it to be true that could have influenced me to believe it was true, but I cannot recall wanting it to be true. I simply believed it was true.

Later, much later, I did not want it too be true and I wished it was not true, just ask my husband. For many years I hated the Baha’i Faith and God. I wished that God did not exist many times but the only way out of that is if I could believe that Baha’u’llah was not who He claimed to be. But I could not do that because of what I knew about Him. So what I wanted to be true did not influence me because I do not operate on my wants, I operate on reason. There was no way out of this bind except to try to make peace with God and the Baha’i Faith, so that is what I set out to accomplish. I am not all the way there but at least I am on the road.

All peer review would accomplish is listening to someone else’s opinion which would not be any more valid than my own. I would just end up believing based upon what other people believed, their opinions, biases included.

At the end of the day it has to be our own choice what to believe because we alone are responsible for our own faith. We cannot offer as an excuse to God that Tom, Dick or Harry did not believe so we too chose not to believe, that won’t fly with God.
Okay then, how many cars are there? I mean, there's only a handful of manufacturers that are manufacturing cars today in a number that makes it likely that the average joe looking to buy a car is going to come across them. And those manufacturers are going to have a limited number of lines. They might have an economy hatchback model, a higher end sedan model, a luxury model, a performance model, a few different types of van, a ute (perhaps with 2 and 4 door variants), an SUV (perhaps one designed for city use but to look cool, and another meant for serious off-roading), and a few different sizes of trucks. And of course, not every manufacturer is going to produce vehicles in every category. Ferrari pretty much deals with the performance model area. Range Rover doesn't really do the small economy hatchbacks. And Isuzu isn't going to be putting out any luxury models any time soon.

Or perhaps you are speaking of the number of individual vehicles that are available to buy. In that case, I think you should count the number of individual believers as well. In any case, the number of religions isn't really going to be overshadowed by the number of cars in the marketplace.
That’s all true, there are many kinds of cats and may kinds of religions, but do you have a point to make?

BTW, I never wanted a SUV, I never even thought of buying one, but I ended up with one because I could not find what the other kind of vehicle that I was looking for at the time. Now I will have nothing else because it is much more practical and easier to drive than the vehicle I had before. That is kind of analogous to my religion. I never wanted one but I ended up with one and now I cannot go back to the way I was before.

That made me think back, and I think that what happens to us in life is a combination of fate and free will choices we make. Nothing happens by chance alone. It was fate, because of an accident that was not my fault that totaled my vehicle, that I had to replace it with another vehicle, and that is the only reason I got a SUV. Likewise, it could have been your fate that you happened to run into a Baha’i like me who talks her ear off and has a predilection for atheists, because most Baha’is are not like me. I might actually be one of a kind. :D

Of course we are all one of a kind because we are all unique, and no two people are alike.
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
That’s true. That happened because people were following the teachings of the leaders of the older religions.
You blaspheme. The older leaders were your manifestations. They had the same core message from God, of peace and universal brotherhood. If people did not follow their path, why do you think they will follow the path of any new manifestation. God is bent on doing useless silly things like sending manifestations. That does not work, it is a total failure.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
You blaspheme. The older leaders were your manifestations. They had the same core message from God, of peace and universal brotherhood. If people did not follow their path, why do you think they will follow the path of any new manifestation. God is bent on doing useless silly things like sending manifestations. That does not work, it is a total failure.
I was not referring to the Messengers/Manifestations of God as leaders.
The Messengers/Manifestations of God did not lead the religions, they revealed those religions, so they did not lead anyone astray.

The older religions did have all of what you said, but the religious leaders of those religions led people astray.
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
The older religions did have all of what you said, but the religious leaders of those religions led people astray.
You mean Abbas Nuri, Shoghi Shirazi and your House of Justice? Bahaollah should not have appointed Abbas Nuri as his successors, Abbas Nuri should not have appointed Shoghi Shirazi as his successor, this is nepotism; and Bahais should not have constituted the House of Justice which came up later.

Interpretations - that is where mistakes occur.

For example, I do not think Bahaollah ever mentioned Krishna or Buddha as manifestations. That is what the later Bahai leaders added on their own without Allah's sanction. This is corruption of the Message. Neither Krishna nor Buddha ever talked of the God of Abraham. Krishna said that he was the Supreme God. For Buddha, the talk of any God or manifestations was useless speculation which should not be indulged in.
 
Last edited:

Tiberius

Well-Known Member
That’s true. That happened because people were following the teachings of the leaders of the older religions.

Shifting the blame doesn't explain why it happened.

I guess you are asking why anyone should believe the Baha’i Faith is true if the claim of Baha’u’llah to have received a message from God cannot be proven to be true.

Yes. And you failed to answer that question.

What you are really saying is that I cannot prove that it is true, I can only believe it is true. That is correct because nobody can prove that a religion is true as a fact, they can only prove it is true to themselves.

We've been over this. Proving it to themselves isn't actually PROVING it.

I would not say it is true unless I could prove it is true. All I can say is that I believe it is true.
I think that the evidence proves that it is true but that is just my personal opinion.

So you BELIEVE that your INTERPRETATION of the evidence means it is true. But your beliefs and your interpretations are not infallible, are they?

Car analogies do not work for religions because religions are not equivalent to cars. You can find cars with the same features at all the dealerships, so it makes sense to compare cars at other dealerships. The same does not apply to religions. There are no other religions that all the features that the Baha’i Faith has so it would not have helped me to look at other religions, since I needed to have the features that only the Baha’i Faith has..

Is that your excuse for everything? "You can't compare it because it's not the same thing!" You've trotted this out whenever you have been faced with some uncomfortable point. You've used everything from, "You can't compare cars and religion because they aren't the same thing," to "You can't compare Bahai and Christianity because they aren't the same thing."

It seems you won't be satisfied until we are comparing one thing with itself - which voids any purpose of having a comparison in the first place!

People all choose their cars and religions very differently because humans are all different. Other Baha’is probably looked at other religions before they chose the Baha’i Faith because they were searching for a religion, but I was not searching for a religion so I did not look at other religions. I was attracted to the Baha’i message of the oneness of mankind and world unity, not to the Baha’i religion. I did not even think in terms of religion back then because I was not raised in a religion and I knew nothing about religion.

And how is that any different to people choosing a car to buy?

Other Tesla owners probably looked at other cars before they chose a Tesla because they were searching for a car, but I was not searching for a car so I did not look at other cars. I was attracted to the Tesla car because of its zero emission engine, not to the Tesla brand. I did not even think in terms of brands back then because I was not raised with brand loyalty and I knew nothing about cars.

See how the same reasoning works just as well?

That’s true, but I do not think that matters as long as you are not one of those gullible people, and I don’t think you are.

If someone believes a thing to be true when there is no actual real world evidence for that thing, do you consider them to be one of those gullible people?

The only tests I know about are the tests of a Prophet I told you about before, but maybe you can devise a test of your own.

And would those tests eliminate a person who is NOT a prophet?

I have lots of piles of bunk in my house but I have better things to do than remove them. I have been under a pile of atheists since I started a new thread three weeks ago, so that has taken all my time. But you know what they say, for everything there is a season. I prayed to God last night to relieve me of all these posts and apparently God heard me because the storm suddenly died down.

Funny how God answers your prayer and does something which could have happened by itself, and yet God never answers the prayers of the guy with a life changing injury to get healed so he can provide for his family.

It only matters what actually happened, not what could have happened, and I am the only one who knows what actually happened. Of course if I wanted it to be true that could have influenced me to believe it was true, but I cannot recall wanting it to be true. I simply believed it was true.

Later, much later, I did not want it too be true and I wished it was not true, just ask my husband. For many years I hated the Baha’i Faith and God. I wished that God did not exist many times but the only way out of that is if I could believe that Baha’u’llah was not who He claimed to be. But I could not do that because of what I knew about Him. So what I wanted to be true did not influence me because I do not operate on my wants, I operate on reason. There was no way out of this bind except to try to make peace with God and the Baha’i Faith, so that is what I set out to accomplish. I am not all the way there but at least I am on the road.

All peer review would accomplish is listening to someone else’s opinion which would not be any more valid than my own. I would just end up believing based upon what other people believed, their opinions, biases included.

At the end of the day it has to be our own choice what to believe because we alone are responsible for our own faith. We cannot offer as an excuse to God that Tom, Dick or Harry did not believe so we too chose not to believe, that won’t fly with God.

You really don't understand how peer review works or why it's important, do you?

That’s all true, there are many kinds of cats and may kinds of religions, but do you have a point to make?

BTW, I never wanted a SUV, I never even thought of buying one, but I ended up with one because I could not find what the other kind of vehicle that I was looking for at the time. Now I will have nothing else because it is much more practical and easier to drive than the vehicle I had before. That is kind of analogous to my religion. I never wanted one but I ended up with one and now I cannot go back to the way I was before.

That made me think back, and I think that what happens to us in life is a combination of fate and free will choices we make. Nothing happens by chance alone. It was fate, because of an accident that was not my fault that totaled my vehicle, that I had to replace it with another vehicle, and that is the only reason I got a SUV. Likewise, it could have been your fate that you happened to run into a Baha’i like me who talks her ear off and has a predilection for atheists, because most Baha’is are not like me. I might actually be one of a kind. :D

Ah, so you ended up with something you weren't really after, but you took it anyway, you learned to live with it, and you got so used to living with it that changing it to adapt to something new is too much an inconvenience to you - even if ultimately the new thing is better.

I had the same with a keyboard recently. I had an old keyboard that needed to be replaced, so I was forced to get a new one. The new one is a bit of a different layout, so I have to get used to it (for example, on my old keyboard the caps lock key was right at the edge of the keyboard, but the new one has function keys there, so I find my fingers going to the same position relative to the edge of the keyboard as my old one, and I keep hitting the Caps Lock key when I mean to type A, and it leADS TO ME WRITING SENTENCES HALF CAPITALISED LIKE THIS when I press the Caps Lock key and the A key at the same time. I just have to learn to do things a different way. And yes, this new keyboard is much nicer.
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
Simply say because of Bahaollah's whim and family fixation. Allah did not send them a vision of 'heavenly maiden'. They were Bahaollah's appointees and not of Allah, and for three generations they benefited by that. They never had to work for their living. That puts a question mark even on the mission of Bahaollah. Was he on a God's mission or was he establishing a family enterprise?
 
Last edited:

Truthseeker

Non-debating member when I can help myself
Proving it to themselves isn't actually PROVING it.
Not in a scientific sense, or as in mathematics. This isn't about science or mathematics. You can't think outside of that box. This isn't about proving it so everybody can verify it.
So you BELIEVE that your INTERPRETATION of the evidence means it is true. But your beliefs and your interpretations are not infallible, are they?
No, it is not infallible, that is the essence of religious investigation. It is not like science or mathematics. That's not even true of science, either.
 

Tiberius

Well-Known Member
Not in a scientific sense, or as in mathematics. This isn't about science or mathematics. You can't think outside of that box. This isn't about proving it so everybody can verify it.

If you can't produce something that everyone can verify, then what reason is there for anyone else to accept it as an accurate and factual claim?

No, it is not infallible, that is the essence of religious investigation. It is not like science or mathematics. That's not even true of science, either.

However, science has built in ways to reduce and eliminate as much as possible the effects of infallible people. TB doesn't seem to understand how this works. I hope you do.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
However, science has built in ways to reduce and eliminate as much as possible the effects of infallible people. TB doesn't seem to understand how this works. I hope you do.
I do understand how science works but I also understand that it does not work the same way that religion works.
 

Tiberius

Well-Known Member
I do understand how science works but I also understand that it does not work the same way that religion works.

That's because religion deliberately makes itself unfalsifiable.

Also, you don't seem to know how science works. If you did, you would understand why peer review is important. Since you don't understand why peer review is important - or even how it works - it seems to me that you do NOT understand how science works.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
That's because religion deliberately makes itself unfalsifiable.
No, religion does not make itself unfalsifiable. Religion is by its very nature unfalsifiable, since it cannot be proven true or false.

No, religion (e.g., Hinduism, Zoroastrianism, Judaism, Buddhism, Christianity, Islam, Mormonism) are not falsifiable or verifiable. This is because their foundations & claims are non-natural (supernatural or superrational or irrational).

Is religion falsifiable? - Quora
https://www.quora.com › Is-religion-falsifiable

Also, you don't seem to know how science works. If you did, you would understand why peer review is important. Since you don't understand why peer review is important - or even how it works - it seems to me that you do NOT understand how science works.
I do know how science works and I do understand why peer review is important, but you do not know how religion works and how peer review has no application for religious beliefs. You want to conflate science and religion but religion is by nature different from science so the same methods of determining what is true cannot be used.
 

ppp

Well-Known Member
So if “that’s not evidence” what would be evidence of God’s existence?
I don't know.
If God existed, where would we get the evidence? How would we get it?
I don't know. Presumably if there were an omnipotent god, he, she, or that would know and would be able to provide it.

1. God exists and there is evidence so we should look for the evidence.
2. God exists but there is no evidence so there is nothing to look for.
3. God does not exist and that is why there is no evidence.
4 God does not exist and there are facts that can be misconstrued as evidence.
5 multiple gods exist
I believe (1) God exists and there is evidence, because if there was no evidence God could not hold humans accountable for believing in Him.
Everything after because is a non-sequitur.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
I don't know.
That makes sense. How would you know?
I don't know. Presumably if there were an omnipotent god, he, she, or that would know and would be able to provide it.
That makes sense. I believe that is exactly what God has done.
4 God does not exist and there are facts that can be misconstrued as evidence.
5 multiple gods exist
4. falls under 3.
Everything after because is a non-sequitur.
I believe that if a just God exists there would be evidence, because if there was no evidence a just God would not hold humans accountable for believing in Him.
 

ppp

Well-Known Member
That makes sense. I believe that is exactly what God has done.
I know. But if a god exists he has not presented convincing evidence to me

I believe that if a just God exists there would be evidence, because if there was no evidence a just God would not hold humans accountable for believing in Him.
A just god could exist, where we are completely irelavant to him. You just assume that humans are of any import to one or more gods. As far as you know we mean nothing to god.

I get that you believe otherwise, but how would I know your belief from fiction. How would you?
 

Tiberius

Well-Known Member
No, religion does not make itself unfalsifiable. Religion is by its very nature unfalsifiable, since it cannot be proven true or false.

No, religion (e.g., Hinduism, Zoroastrianism, Judaism, Buddhism, Christianity, Islam, Mormonism) are not falsifiable or verifiable. This is because their foundations & claims are non-natural (supernatural or superrational or irrational).

There's nothing that prevents something supernatural from being falsifiable. If prayer actually worked, then it would produce effects which can be measured, and that could easily be falsified.

I do know how science works and I do understand why peer review is important, but you do not know how religion works and how peer review has no application for religious beliefs. You want to conflate science and religion but religion is by nature different from science so the same methods of determining what is true cannot be used.


Is peer review a useful way to make sure that the personal biases of one individual do not influence the results of a study?

Yes or no please.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
There's nothing that prevents something supernatural from being falsifiable. If prayer actually worked, then it would produce effects which can be measured, and that could easily be falsified.
The effects or prayer cannot be measured. Just because a specific prayer was unanswered that proves nothing except that God chose not to answer a prayer request.
Is peer review a useful way to make sure that the personal biases of one individual do not influence the results of a study?

Yes or no please.
Yes.
 
Top