I DID ANSWER IT.
I said, "Anyone who has been paying attention to the discussion would have seen that I was following the hypothetical that YOU set out, in which free will does exist alongside predeterminism." This is because my entire position so far has been that it's not a choice. I've even directly stated this
many times.
Here's a list of posts where I said specifically the words "
It's not a choice" if God knows what we are going to do.
· "It is still something with a possibility of zero. And that means it's not a choice." Post
2868.
· "It's not a choice." Post
2986.
· "If it's a choice then there needs to be more than one option, and each option needs to have some non-zero probability. So it's not a choice." Post
2991.
· "If God knows, then the number of outcomes is reduced to 1. If there is only one outcome, then it's not a choice." Post
3037.
· "If something is a choice, then there must be more than one possible outcome. If God knows ahead of time, then there is only one possible outcome. Therefore it is not a choice." Post
3038.
· "If, from his point of view, it's already happened, then there is only one possible outcome. If there's only one possible outcome, then it's not a choice." Post
3040.
· "If there's only one possible outcome, then it's not a choice." Post
3041.
· "And if I can't do anything different, then it's not a choice, is it?" Post
3056.
· "Again, IT'S NOT A CHOICE. If the actions that a person will take are known ahead of time, then the person in question does not choose to do them." Post
3272.
·
"IF THERE'S ONLY ONE OPTION, THEN IT'S NOT A CHOICE." Post
3277.This one was even in big, bold, underlined letters, so not sure how you missed that one.
· "That's my point. It is NOT a choice." Post
6054. Please note that this one was less than four hours ago, and it was in direct response to you asking, "Why are you making the choice?"