Trailblazer
Veteran Member
I have not made one claim because I have NOTHING to claim.I'm not speaking for you.
I'm pointing out that you have made many claims in this thread.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I have not made one claim because I have NOTHING to claim.I'm not speaking for you.
I'm pointing out that you have made many claims in this thread.
It is obvious. You said that God could not hold humans accountable for believing in Him. That is an assumption. Unless you are God, you could not possibly know this.Explain WHY it is illogical or don't assert it because it is a bald assertion unless you can back it up.
Yes, I know.Claims are not evidence. Evidence is what supports the claims.
I posted the claims of Baha’u’llah and the evidence that supports the claims of Baha’u’llah on this thread:
Questions for knowledgeable Bahai / followers of Baha'u'llah
Several posters have provided lists of your claims on this thread. Sorry.I have not made one claim because I have NOTHING to claim.
That would be you.No, it is not a claim. It is part of scriptures, Baha'u'llah explaining His relationship to God.
A claim would be Baha'u'llah "claiming" to be a Messenger of God, that is a claim.
Atheists are obsessed with idea of claims and they cannot separate claims from scriptures and evidence.
The reply will be that those are not claims. They are floppots.Several posters have provided lists of your claims on this thread. Sorry.
Oh my bad, I thought they were snerflebergs.The reply will be that those are not claims. They are floppots.
I said that God could not hold us accountable for believing in Him if God did not provide evidence of His existence because that would be unjust; so if God is just then God would not hold humans accountable for believing in Him unless God provided evidence of His existence. That is perfectly logical.It is obvious. You said that God could not hold humans accountable for believing in Him. That is an assumption. Unless you are God, you could not possibly know this.
Logic 101
No, you and I have snerflebergs because we are atheists. The righteous have floppots.Oh my bad, I thought they were snerflebergs.
I think I'm just about done with this ridiculousness.
Oh, of course! What was I thinking?No, you and I have snerflebergs because we are atheists. The righteous have floppots.
No, I make no claims. Atheists try to turn my beliefs into claims.That would be you.
Nice projection though. Gotta show those Big Bad Atheists who's boss.
None of those are claims, sorry.Several posters have provided lists of your claims on this thread. Sorry.
The Bible can't be both the claim and the evidence. That is circular reasoning. You need evidence from outside the Bible to back up the claim contained in the Bible. Critical thinking shows us this. Otherwise, the claims that wizards are real in the Harry Potter books would be evidence that wizards are real and that Harry Potter is a wizard.No, I make no claims. Atheists try to turn my beliefs into claims.
Atheists are obsessed with idea that believers make claims and they cannot see the difference between a claim and the evidence that supports the claim For example, the Bible contains claims but the Bible is also the evidence that supports the claims. A person has to use some critical thinking skills to figure these things out.
Several other posters have provided lengthy lists of your claims. One of them did so just an hour or so ago.Belief: an acceptance that a statement is true or that something exists. belief means - Google Search
Claim: state or assert that something is the case, typically without providing evidence or proof. claim means - Google Search
Please show me where I ever stated or asserted that my belief is true. I only ever said that I believe it is true.
That is not a claim, not by any stretch of the imagination.
Then I'm sorry, but you apparently do not know the difference between claims and evidence, as you've shown above with your Bible example. Atheists aren't your problem here, you are your problem here.Aside from that, I have provided evidence over and over and over again, it is just not the evidence you want. Tough tiddlywinks.
They were all claims.None of those are claims, sorry.
I make no claims. I only state my beliefs.
Get a dictionary.
Saying human is not animal is wrong. Also species right before us, H Heidlebergensis used tools, clothing, shelter, buried their dead and may have had a language and some spiritual beliefs.
He made these claims before we found the intermediate hominids. You can tap dance and try to reconcile some of this but it's just more unproven new age wu. Like this and old scripture if a God was actually communication with a person we would get more than the same old folk tales.
I think it would be more accurate to say that "soul" has not been defined clearly enough to allow testable claims to be made about the soul.
IOW, it's not so much that the the soul is an idea with merit; it's that it falls short of even being wrong: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_even_wrong
I don't know why you are confused.Yes, I know.
Which is the reason I am confused as to why you keep thinking that the claims you are providing are evidence.
Well, then the rest of us will do that differently, if we choose to and claim other versions of evidence and logic.
The Bible contains claims but the Bible is also the evidence that supports the claims. I don't care if it is circular reasoning, it is what it is. God is not going to give you what you want because God is not a short order cook.The Bible can't be both the claim and the evidence. That is circular reasoning. You need evidence from outside the Bible to back up the claim contained in the Bible. Critical thinking shows us this.
You are the one who does not know the difference. I won't be explaining it again, because it is clearly delineated in this post:Then I'm sorry, but you apparently do not know the difference between claims and evidence,