• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Atheists: What would be evidence of God’s existence?

samtonga43

Well-Known Member
Explain WHY it is illogical or don't assert it because it is a bald assertion unless you can back it up.
It is obvious. You said that God could not hold humans accountable for believing in Him. That is an assumption. Unless you are God, you could not possibly know this.
Logic 101
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
No, it is not a claim. It is part of scriptures, Baha'u'llah explaining His relationship to God.
A claim would be Baha'u'llah "claiming" to be a Messenger of God, that is a claim.

Atheists are obsessed with idea of claims and they cannot separate claims from scriptures and evidence.
That would be you.
Nice projection though. Gotta show those Big Bad Atheists who's boss.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
It is obvious. You said that God could not hold humans accountable for believing in Him. That is an assumption. Unless you are God, you could not possibly know this.
Logic 101
I said that God could not hold us accountable for believing in Him if God did not provide evidence of His existence because that would be unjust; so if God is just then God would not hold humans accountable for believing in Him unless God provided evidence of His existence. That is perfectly logical.

I got this idea from what Baha'u'llah wrote, which is also perfectly logical. In the following passage Baha'u'llah explains what the evidence is that establishes His truth (supports His claims). Then He says that everyone has the capacity to recognize this evidence (the signs of God). Then He says that it would be unjust for God to expect us to recognize the signs of God if we did not have the capacity to do so. Then He says that God is not unjust because God never expects more of a person than that person is capable of (never tasks a soul beyond its power).

“Say: The first and foremost testimony establishing His truth is His own Self. Next to this testimony is His Revelation. For whoso faileth to recognize either the one or the other He hath established the words He hath revealed as proof of His reality and truth. This is, verily, an evidence of His tender mercy unto men. He hath endowed every soul with the capacity to recognize the signs of God. How could He, otherwise, have fulfilled His testimony unto men, if ye be of them that ponder His Cause in their hearts. He will never deal unjustly with any one, neither will He task a soul beyond its power. He, verily, is the Compassionate, the All-Merciful.” Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, pp. 105-106
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
That would be you.
Nice projection though. Gotta show those Big Bad Atheists who's boss.
No, I make no claims. Atheists try to turn my beliefs into claims.

Atheists are obsessed with idea that believers make claims and they cannot see the difference between a claim and the evidence that supports the claim For example, the Bible contains claims but the Bible is also the evidence that supports the claims. A person has to use some critical thinking skills to figure these things out.

Belief: an acceptance that a statement is true or that something exists. belief means - Google Search

Claim: state or assert that something is the case, typically without providing evidence or proof. claim means - Google Search

Please show me where I ever stated or asserted that my belief is true. I only ever said that I believe it is true.
That is not a claim, not by any stretch of the imagination.

Aside from that, I have provided evidence over and over and over again, it is just not the evidence you want. Tough tiddlywinks.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
No, I make no claims. Atheists try to turn my beliefs into claims.

Atheists are obsessed with idea that believers make claims and they cannot see the difference between a claim and the evidence that supports the claim For example, the Bible contains claims but the Bible is also the evidence that supports the claims. A person has to use some critical thinking skills to figure these things out.
The Bible can't be both the claim and the evidence. That is circular reasoning. You need evidence from outside the Bible to back up the claim contained in the Bible. Critical thinking shows us this. Otherwise, the claims that wizards are real in the Harry Potter books would be evidence that wizards are real and that Harry Potter is a wizard.

It's not atheists' fault that you don't know the difference between claims and evidence and that you don't think you're making claims when you clearly are.
The Big Bad Atheists aren't responsible for your errors, as much as you want them to be.

Belief: an acceptance that a statement is true or that something exists. belief means - Google Search

Claim: state or assert that something is the case, typically without providing evidence or proof. claim means - Google Search

Please show me where I ever stated or asserted that my belief is true. I only ever said that I believe it is true.
That is not a claim, not by any stretch of the imagination.
Several other posters have provided lengthy lists of your claims. One of them did so just an hour or so ago.

Aside from that, I have provided evidence over and over and over again, it is just not the evidence you want. Tough tiddlywinks.
Then I'm sorry, but you apparently do not know the difference between claims and evidence, as you've shown above with your Bible example. Atheists aren't your problem here, you are your problem here.

Tough tiddlywinks, this is ridiculous, at this point.
 

TransmutingSoul

One Planet, One People, Please!
Premium Member
Saying human is not animal is wrong. Also species right before us, H Heidlebergensis used tools, clothing, shelter, buried their dead and may have had a language and some spiritual beliefs.
He made these claims before we found the intermediate hominids. You can tap dance and try to reconcile some of this but it's just more unproven new age wu. Like this and old scripture if a God was actually communication with a person we would get more than the same old folk tales.

So you are seeing the issue is the science that is not yet known, but has been stated in Faith that it will be known, that man is.more than the animal.

Personally I see Abdul'baha has supported evolution, however science finds it has unfolded, what he has offered that science is yet to confirm, is that the spirit behind that evolution has a purpose, that the mind of man develops apart from the animal nature.

The understanding of this topic also requires us to consider the topic of the 5 levels spirit that are the animating force or energy behind creation.

https://www.bahai.org/library/authoritative-texts/abdul-baha/some-answered-questions/8#394598598

Regards Tony
 

TransmutingSoul

One Planet, One People, Please!
Premium Member
I think it would be more accurate to say that "soul" has not been defined clearly enough to allow testable claims to be made about the soul.

IOW, it's not so much that the the soul is an idea with merit; it's that it falls short of even being wrong: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_even_wrong

The energy behind creation is the Spirit, have a read of this and consider if it is viable, but yet to be tested by science.

https://www.bahai.org/library/authoritative-texts/abdul-baha/some-answered-questions/8#394598598

Thank you for a balanced answer.

Regards Tony
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Yes, I know.

Which is the reason I am confused as to why you keep thinking that the claims you are providing are evidence.
I don't know why you are confused.

Baha’u’llah’s Two Bold Claims

All of which leads us back to Baha’u’llah, who made two very bold claims. First, he declared he was God’s messenger for the next one thousand years, having the same divine authority, the same Holy Spirit, the same divine power, as Moses, Christ, Muhammad, and the other founders of the major world religions:

Baha’u’llah made a second and even more challenging claim. He declared he was the promised world messiah foretold in all the prophecies, in all the holy books, of all the religions of the world – the one promised to come on the Day of Judgment, the Day of God, the Time of the End, the End of the World, to establish the kingdom of God on Earth.

https://bahaiteachings.org/what-did-bahaullah-teach?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Below is a list of the primary categories of evidence that support the claims above.

1. His character (His qualities).

That can be determined by reading about Him in books such as the following:
The Revelation of Bahá'u'lláh, Volumes 1-4

2. His Revelation is what He accomplished (His Mission on earth, i,e., the history of the Baha'i Faith).

That can be determined by reading about His mission in books such as the following:
God Passes By (1844-1944)
The Revelation of Bahá'u'lláh, Volumes 1-4, which cover the 40 years of His Mission, from 1853-1892.

3. His Writings which can be found in books that are posted online: The Works of Bahá'u'lláh

4. Baha'u'llah fulfilled all the Bible prophecies Baha'u'llah fulfilled all the Bible prophecies that refer to the return of Christ and the promised Messiah, which is like icing on the cake. That proves to me He was the Messiah and the return of Christ. Those prophecies and how they were fulfilled are delineated in the following book:
William Sears, Thief in the Night

5. Baha'u'llah predicted many events that later came to pass is more icing on the cake. Some of these predictions and how they came to pass are listed and delineated in this book: The Challenge of Baha'u'llah
 

Sheldon

Veteran Member
Well, then the rest of us will do that differently, if we choose to and claim other versions of evidence and logic.

Logic is a method of reasoning that adheres to strict principles of validation, you can't have your own logic, that's an oxymoron.

Evidence is a much maligned word, and yes that IS my opinion. Judged from the number of posters here who keep asserting a bare claim is evidence?
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
The Bible can't be both the claim and the evidence. That is circular reasoning. You need evidence from outside the Bible to back up the claim contained in the Bible. Critical thinking shows us this.
The Bible contains claims but the Bible is also the evidence that supports the claims. I don't care if it is circular reasoning, it is what it is. God is not going to give you what you want because God is not a short order cook.

God does not care what you want. God gives you what you need and when you reject it you are the only one who misses out. God does not need your belief because God is fully self-sufficient and fully self-sustaining.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Then I'm sorry, but you apparently do not know the difference between claims and evidence,
You are the one who does not know the difference. I won't be explaining it again, because it is clearly delineated in this post:

#1597 Trailblazer

The Bible contains claims but it is also the evidence that supports the claims.

The Writings of Baha'u'llah contain claims but there is outside evidence that support those claims and that is why the Baha'i Faith has better evidence than Christianity to support the claims of Baha'u'llah.

Any critical thinker could figure this out.
 
Top