• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Augustine & Original Sin

Clear

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
@Katzpur said : “This may strike you as a strange way to see things, but I believe that the events in the Garden of Eden unfolded exactly as God intended them to (post #59


I agree.

CAN AN OMNISCIENT GOD BE SURPRISED?
It’s hard to reconcile the belief in Omniscience with the typical Fall of Adam tradition where God is somehow surprised at the fall of Adam and a wily lucifer who somehow wrecks God’s “Plan A” for mankind, necessitating a surprised God to come up with a “Plan B” involving a savior.


In the ancient Judeo-Christian model God is not surprised nor caught unaware of the result of an innocent and naïve Adam is in a garden in close proximity to Satan (who also was in the Garden and placed there on purpose by God the Father who could have kept Satan apart from the couple). Thus, the Prophet Sedrach’s observation to God the Father that : “It was by your will that Adam was deceived, my master” (Apo Sedrach 5:1-7) is poignant.


The second principle was the early doctrine that Adam partook of the “TREE OF WISDOM” (1st Enoch 32:3-6). It was not simply the tree of "knowledge” and that knowledge itself was not evil.

The implications of both ancient principles was the basis of an entirely different paradigm. Combined and paraphrased, this ancient doctrine was : “It was according to God's will that Adam acquired wisdom.”.

Just as the origin of Satan is not to be understood outside of early Christian theology, I do not think the fall of Adam can be well understood without considering the ancient historical context the story was created in.



REGARDING THE PRINCIPLE OF GAINING KNOWLEDGE OF GOOD AND EVIL

I certainly agree with the ancient principle that Adam’s having gained moral knowledge and understanding of “Good and Evil” was NOT itself evil nor was it a “fiasco”, but rather it was according to the original plan of God.

Our Mortality and the atonement of Jesus does not seem to represent a “plan B” in early Adamic, Abrahamic and Enoich Christian histories but rather it WAS the original plan. The Messiah was the lamb slain “from the foundation of the world” and not “from the Fall of Adam”.

Even the ancient Judeo-Christian “war in heaven” histories show that God was not simply “duped” by a clever Lucifer bent on revenge for Adam’s "role" in the war in heaven, but rather the acquisition of knowledge and understanding WAS a major reason for mortality.

The Apostolic Fathers such as Diogenes, Clement, and Hermas (et al) made clear, the essential importance of knowledge in the early Christian teachings :

Quote: “the tree of knowledge does not kill, on the contrary, disobedience kills. For it is not without significance that the scriptures record that God in the beginning planted a tree of knowledge and a tree of life in the midst of Paradise, thereby revealing that life is through knowledge...For there is neither life without knowledge, nor sound knowledge without true life; therefore each tree stands planted near the other”. (Diog 12:2-3)

Clement, the colleague of the apostles Peter and Paul taught that “...the Master has willed that we should taste immortal knowledge” (I Clement 36:2)

Moral knowledge is the very principle early Christians were taught to seek. This principle of ASKING God for revelations and knowledge is woven through much of the early Christian doctrines. For example, Ignatius and others, remind the Christians multiple times to seek knowledge and understanding :

Quote: “Devote yourself to unceasing prayers; Ask for greater understanding than you have.” (I-poly 1:3). “ask, in order that the unseen things may be revealed to you, that you may be lacking in nothing and abound in every spiritual gift” (Ignatius-poly 2:22)

Hermas and many others also make this ancient principle clear : Quote: “Do not attempt, as though you were intelligent, to understand things you cannot comprehend, but ask the Lord that you may receive the intelligence to understand them.” (Hermas 79:6)

Even the reward which God often gives the repentant, is knowledge: The angel of repentance, in speaking to Hermas says is “...in charge of repentance, and I give understanding to all who repent. Her 218:30:2;



IGNORANCE AND SIN ARE BOTH LAMENTABLE
While moral and social ignorance is lamentable, the prophet Enoch relates God’s explanation to him regarding the relative import of ignorance and knowledge and sin. It impacts the early Christian discussion as to WHY God engineered the Fall of Adam to Occur :

Quote: And I .... called his name Adam. And I gave him his free will; and I pointed out to him the two ways –light and darkness. And I said to him, ‘this is good for you, but that is bad’; so that I might come to know whether he has love toward me or abhorrence, and so that it might become plain who among his race loves me. Whereas I have come to know his nature, he does not know his own nature. That is why ignorance is more lamentable than the sin such as it is in him to sin. And I said, “After sin there is nothing for it but death.’....and I imposed sleep upon him, and he fell asleep. And while he was sleeping, I took from him a rib. And I created for him a wife, so that death might come to him by his wife.” (2en 30:14-17)


It is in THIS ancient context that the prophet “Sedrach said to him” [God]. It was by your will that Adam was deceived, my master. In one Adamic history, Adam relates the coming of the Pre-Mortal Messiah to him And behold, your word came to me and the Lord said to me, ‘Because your days are numbered, you have been made to cherish knowledge; ...” (Life of Adam and Eve (Vita) 27:2-3) (Note that “your word” is a euphamism for the pre-mortal messiah)


In any case Katzpur, I thought your point was insightful.

Clear
ειεινεειω
 
Last edited:

rational experiences

Veteran Member
Immaculate is pre existing mass as mess. Topic heavens pre owned spirit body.

I symbol in science was describing by words intensity magnetisation a subject. AH breath oxygen another subject. Letters given symbolism and also numerical factors.

Science multi subjects.

Immaculate was sacrificed...so there is no traceable paths back. We live in light owning by subject descriptive reasoning why natural light exists.

Burning gases in a vacuum balanced by immaculate presence. The teaching.

Science an extra reaction is not included. Another subject machine.

Theme science wise brothers machines are evil as a topic.

God supports perfection the measure of life. O Phi.

Not a reaction as human used the measure. Measure does not equal topic to be measured.

Machine. Mass God owned attacked melted inside heavens by science. Measure used for theory also. A reaction in machine.

Act of Alchemy lucifer. Cunning intent human thesis I am cleverer than God.

Thinker I can actively change God. Human theist

And you scientist were proven wrong as we all died a long time ago in satanic earth law pressure changes

Laws natural. Science does not own them.

Just the fact that science owns multi subjects of thesis in the bible proved it was not subject to creations beginning just his science activated caused changes to heavens whilst machine reacting.

Science did not exist it was implemented.
 

amorphous_constellation

Well-Known Member
When I realized that Augustine actually suggested that children born with terrible deformities could actually be explained by their already-fallen nature due to "original sin," I put Augustine down and never picked him up again.

Presently in reading about supposed necessity of infant baptism in ancient christianity, and the 'pelagian heresy,' I become confused on what original sin actually is. It seems that the ancient christians may have associated 'original sin/the fallen state' as being evident/apparent, such that to them, baptism seems to be defined as a basic exorcism of the 'universal' innate state.

So basically, it seems that they may have thought that everyone was innately possessed, and needed the inoculation of baptism (which seems to be basically exorcism) initially in any case, no matter the state of the human that 'needs' it. It couldn't have been just those with 'deformities' that he percieved as being 'fallen,' it probably was everyone, if everyone 'required' baptism. Corroborating this as well, were the practices of exsufflation/insufflation, which apparently are ancient catholic terms, that denoted some idea that alongside the baptism, the priest was supposed to hiss at the demons, or blow them out.

Therefore, it seems that 'original sin' seems to approximately denote the idea of 'innate demon possession,' and someone like augustine probably wouldn't have hinged his conception of it merely on a few theological configurations in one of paul's letters. Rather, to augustine, the concept was probably downstream of things that he perceived as being more universally apparent about the proximal human condition.
 

PearlSeeker

Well-Known Member
The thing that passes to all of mankind because of Adam's sin is death. We all sinned in Adam because we share the same nature he had when he sinned. it is the very nature of man which has been condemned to death. The law does that.

Paul says, "for as in Adam all die" ...."even so in Christ shall all be made alive". We are all by nature in Adam, but none are by nature in Christ. Therefore, the only "all" to be made alive are those in Christ.
Death is not the OS. It's the supposed consequence of OS. Other consequence is man's wounded (not totally corrupted) nature inclined to evil.

But we know that animals had been dying before first human existed. It's common to all living beings. We just inherited this property from our mammal ancestors.

Baptism is supposed to erase the OS but not its consequences. What's the point then? In what way has man been set free by Christ?
 
Top