Australian Satanism and the Temple of THEM

[kerriscott]

Thank you

Actually, the black cat in one of your pictures looks exactly like a much loved cat who deigned to reside in the same apartment as me. Now (sadly) deceased after a long (in cat terms) life.

it's not Chris

Quid pro quo. Given that Chris - and Uncle Tom Cobley and all - claim or have claimed (without any evidence) that "we" are all DM. So, why not claim that "it" is Chris?

for ****z and giggles

Well, "it" got Chris back here, didn't it. Result. Intentional (by "it") or otherwise.

Thus we have not only some 'indicative' contradictions from someone but also:

"The scope and depth of much of this magickal esotery drove me somewhat to the edge of madness many times, and maybe I went over the edge a couple too. It is possible that I am psychotic and unable to empathize with the views of others [...] thinking I was the captain when I was really just a deckhand."​

 

[Waren_S_Gnobe]

So much for your goodbye then. Again.

So depressing it can be sometimes.. don't you think?

And as for his leaving from other places too - not so long ago (term of hours) he received scorching from a certain Mistress on a certain social network overflown with newbie o9aers and many old farts, actually. He was ridiculed and this was at disposal as witnessed account and yet another example of what's this all about really, of many of those newbies and old farts around that social network. As one of involved commented : "He's like a fly in spider's web, thinking he's tarantula". Ha! As I said, flies stuck to the glue eating their way out. bizzare actually when you look at it.

And that act of his on mentioned social network. Oh.. oh.. He was talking crap like he is the one who actually was heretical enough to push forward this or that fraction and strain of sinister. He even started to push forward some talk about ALL Seeing Eye of THEM, suspiciously soon after that name for a Holy sigil of an Unholy Lodge ("ALL Seeing I, One and ALL") was dropped recently here and there. Someone tied this up with very, as well suspicious, claims of Hollow, given to that someone in private of supposed super-natural (o profane) influence of THEM on o9a, on universe itself I guess, so that "heresies", like some of non-public teachings of the aforementioned Lodge are in a way his doing. What a nut! Sinister mother****ingallpiercingHEofthem Messiah. "What? sinister what? a messiah? hahahahhahaaahahhahahaha good nonsense to be used maybe as an example of a nonsense." she said almost chocking with a sip of tea.

So.. What one does with a fly stuck in a glue who refuses to die and buzzes all summer's day long fed on glue and heat? You know that. don't you? He knows that. maybe.. But than again it would be - o9a bulling mentally challenged, crippled, buhu-hu, so not eagletarian and so inhumane, so dishonorable. I say it's humanism in its highest form! As someone also described ONA. Very accurately, in my opinion.

 

[Kelsey_Glynn]

All the reader has to do is pay attention to your actions and behaviour concerning Richard Moult, Ford, Chloe, & Ryan. Ungrateful and dishonourable you are. After they gave you their friendship, the love of a pupil, after they put in their effort, time, and mind; to help in their own way to make your ONA what it is today, you turn on them and back stab them.

This continual diatribe about needing "appreciation" upon whomever it might be who you are projecting (wrongly, no doubt) the identity of David Myatt on at any given time bears the stench of some bizarre parody of the Friday night thank-you letters section on the Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon:

"Thank you, Kris McDermott a.k.a. Tnepres Ra et al. for taking it upon yourself to be the principal "meme monkey" of the O9A and selling cheaply-produced, badly edited Lulu versions of Order material for exorbitant amounts of money."

"Thank you, Kris McDermott a.k.a. Tnepres Ra et al. for publishing unauthorized compilations of David Myatt's writings - in badly edited, cheaply-produced Lulu bindings for exorbitant amounts of money - filled with highly suppositious and very contentious 'biographical' information about the author, then throwing tantrums after the author requests that it be taken down."

:sorry1:

 

[Eugene McQueen]

This continual diatribe about needing "appreciation" blah, blah, sassenach chatter, blah.

A um nay whae ya think am ur Davy but. A um nay an Aussie, ya bampot! And it dinnae matter whae the public thinks you and I are. So lang as you ken that anno that you ken that anno whae you are Myatt! Anno it's you behind aw the sockpuppets! Ya got ***** te do aw day but run sockpuppet inquisitions.

It isnae aboot demanding appreciation. It's aboot your inner character as a person Myatt. You're dishonourable. There's noffin you can say aboot being ungateful and dishonourable is there LOL.

I repeat myself to the reader, if you are into the ONA and you're a nobody, Myatt and his sockpuppet gestapo will leave you alone. But if you make a name for yourself or have a reputation in ONA and you get more attention then he does, then he'll put a false charge on you and tell people everywhere online you're nay an ONA member! Nobody in his dafty ONA is safe.

This is what ONA looks like when it is dying. Dying under Myatt's ego.

 

[kerriscott]

A um nay whae ya...

A rather silly attempt at trying to show you're Scottish, and just another rant from a moac.

Unsurprisingly you failed to provide any evidence for any of your claims (e.g DM being AL, and DM posting on forums, and about you being in contact with Moult, the pseudonymous Chloe, et al) just as you ignored the offer of a meeting with Shaykh Abd al-Aziz (or whatever Muslim name the individual in question is currently using in order to travel to Muslim lands) and ignored that offer despite you - anonymously of course - boasting about someone's 'dishonor' and that "actions speak louder than words".

You also failed to explain Myatt's recent writings re his philosophy of pathei mathos and his regret regarding his extremist past and his desire for expiation and reclusiveness, writings indicative of his physis, and writings which are evidence against your unsubstantiated (and rather peevish) allegations regarding him.

However, moacs (a sub-species of the genus troll) by their nature never provide any evidence, are always anonymous, and - in many (but not all) instances - are former admirers or fans of DM who hasn't given them the attention and the praise the moac believes they deserve, or who have been totally ignored by DM because DM is unaware of or uninterested in their existence, especially when the fan/admirer believes DM to be AL.

 

[Eugene McQueen]

Unsurprisingly you failed to provide any evidence for any of your claims (e.g DM being AL, and DM posting on forums, and about you being in contact with Moult, the pseudonymous Chloe, et al) just as you ignored the offer of a meeting with Shaykh Abd al-Aziz (or whatever Muslim name the individual in question is currently using in order to travel to Muslim lands) and ignored that offer despite you - anonymously of course - boasting about someone's 'dishonor' and that "actions speak louder than words".

You also failed to explain Myatt's recent writings re his philosophy of pathei mathos and his regret regarding his extremist past and his desire for expiation and reclusiveness, writings indicative of his physis, and writings which are evidence against your unsubstantiated (and rather peevish) allegations regarding him.

However, moacs (a sub-species of the genus troll) by their nature never provide any evidence, are always anonymous, and - in many (but not all) instances - are former admirers or fans of DM who hasn't given them the attention and the praise the moac believes they deserve, or who have been totally ignored by DM because DM is unaware of or uninterested in their existence, especially when the fan/admirer believes DM to be AL.

Look at aw the commas Davy! Incredibly readers, David's sock-puppet post has only three sentences! Such long run on sentences too David.

Moult was the one who told me long ago you were behind the Anton Long pseudonym. This was when you and he weren't talking. He also told me a list of all the sock-puppets you use. Let's see, there's Dark Logos, Dark Lianna, Raffy, Sinister Moon, Julie Wright your "biographer", Scott Liddle, and lets not forget the new addition R. Parker. Ask Moult. Even your ONA academic stooges say so in private. Ask them.

"Your" recent writings? LOL. What a laugh. Anybody knows you plagiarize your Greek translations. I ask the readers to obtain various copies of different Greek translations of "work" Davy here claims to have done and compare. You will see that Davy here picks one translation and merely changes a few words around.

I'd kick your erse in a fight Davy. You're diminutive in size. What are you 5 feet tall? Everybody in Shrewsbury knows how tiny you are. You're a right regular puffer mate. Puffin up your size, your ego, you reputation, "your" Greek translations.

The truth is readers, Davy here is afraid of Ryan. He's afraid that Ryan will get more attention than he from ONA stooges. Davy is a jealous short little man who can't stand this. That's why it's nothing for him to put in six months chasing Ryan around the internet every chance he gets. He needs to run Ryan out of ONA so he can have that lime light aw to himself. Don't pay attention to what words Davy here is saying. Pay attention to what he does and how he acts.

And by the way Davy, nice nickname you chose for this sock-puppet. Do you like naming socks after poor victims of yours? Remember Kerri Delacruz?

I ask the readers to go visit this site and see for yourself - webshouter.wordpress.com

 

[Eugene McQueen]

A rather silly attempt at trying to show you're Scottish, and just another rant from a moac.

Using ad hominems are you. Typical of you Davy. Just look at aw the commas. Typical of you Davy. Look at all your run on sentences. Typical of you Davy.

My statements aboot your character stands. As I stated many times, to the reader, disregard Myatt's words dear reader, and pay attention to his actions and behaviour.

Let me remind you dear reader that Myatt took the Shahada when he became a Muslim, now he has abandoned his oaths. Dear readers, that is the action and behaviour of a dishonourable man.

He is also a dishonest man. If you, dear reader, read various Greek translations of the "work" Davy here claims to have done, you will see he doesn't translate noffin. He simply picks a preexisting translated work and changes around a few words. Anybody with a rudimentary knowledge of Greek can do that. He is a plagiarist at best.

That is one reason why it is so important for Myatt to chase away Ryan and discredit him. Davy here has stolen many ideas and concepts from Ryan.

Dishonourable & dishonest I say.

 

[samosasauce]

Awesome! I'd love to read some of the things you've written

 

[Eugene McQueen]

Awesome! I'd love to read some of the things you've written

You can read about some of Myatt's criminal work at this address - webshouter.wordpress.com

You will see why he has chosen the nickname "Kerri" for his sockpuppet at that revealing site.

 

[kerriscott]

Just look at aw the commas

Kris - Christopher - that's exactly what you said back in the day. On the 600club and elsewhere.

My statements aboot your character stands

Yet you, for some reason, refuse to meet Shaykh Abd al-Aziz ibn Myatt in the mid-East and make that accusation to his face.

I think we all know the reason why you refuse to do so. Who therefore is the dishonorable one?

Again, we all know the answer, don't we?

Anybody with a rudimentary knowledge of Greek can do that

Perhaps you can offer us your translation of and commentary on the Pymander tractate? No? Why not?

Then perhaps you can provide us with your scholarly critique of that translation and commentary? No? You can't? Why, you're just jealous aren't you, and can't provide any actual evidence of your accusations.

Davy here has stolen many ideas and concepts from Ryan

QED I believe re you being Ryan aka Christopher McDermott aka The Jealous Mundane, he who has no documented deeds - sinister or otherwise - to his name.

Do favor us with exactly what these "many ideas and concepts from Ryan" are. Again, that's another accusation you made back in the day, on the 600club and elsewhere.

webshouter.wordpress.com

Is that the best you can do? Link to a site by another Moac? And what exactly is the evidence for any of the accusations there? Accusations which, of course, are made by a Moac.

Moacs were first spotted in the wild in the early naughties, in that now almost deforested area known as Usenet. Once considered a rare species, they migrated to forums and thence to blogs where they multiplied and - recognized as a sub-species of the genus Troll - were given their current name of Moac. There is, however, some dispute among internetologists as to their exact taxonomy, with some consigning them to the genus Stalker rather than to the genus Troll.

In some instances, Moacs are motivated by personal jealousy or perceived personal insults, as was the case with the disgruntled spouse who, over a period of several years, posted hundreds of rants about Myatt on dozens of forums and put up several blogs accusing Myatt of all sorts of things, for it seemed that Myatt had had an affair with that Moac's wife

In other instances, Moacs are political zealots who hate Myatt because they believe him to be a neo-nazi or a terrorist, or a Muslim, or a traitor to 'the cause' for renouncing his neo-nazi views.

However, in many instances, Moacs are former internet admirers or former internet fans of DM who hasn't given them the attention and the praise the Moac believes they deserve, or who have been totally ignored by DM because DM is unaware of or uninterested in their existence, especially when the fan/admirer believes DM to be AL.​

That you are reduced to adopting an anonymous persona in order to anonymously repeat the pathetic accusations of another anonymous person is indicative.

That you refuse to meet Shaykh Abd al-Aziz ibn Myatt in the mid-East and repeat your accusations to his face is the most indicative thing of all.

Therefore, the word 'pathetic', in relation to you, just seems so inadequate.

If you ever want to taken seriously ever again then you'll accept the challenge of meeting in the mid-East. Haven't you realized yet that everyone is laughing at - and mocking - you?

 

[jeff77]

Dishonourable & dishonest I say.

Making such accusations anonymously via the internet is easy, isn't it?

The fact that you've "bottled out" of a meeting with DM in the mid-East - just as Chris McD bottled out of a similar meeting with Kerri - says eveything that needs to be said about the both of you, whether or not you and Chris McD are one and the same person.

You and Chris McD talk about dishonor while refusing to back up your internet words with an honorable deed. Which honorable deed is making your accusations face to face in the real world with the person you're accusing of being dishonorable. Why is it that you're not prepared to do the honorable deed that your accusations honorably demand?

Just like KS said, I think we all know the answer.

 

[AnnaCzereda]

A um nay whae ya think am ur Davy but. A um nay an Aussie, ya bampot! And it dinnae matter whae the public thinks you and I are. So lang as you ken that anno that you ken that anno whae you are Myatt! Anno it's you behind aw the sockpuppets! Ya got ***** te do aw day but run sockpuppet inquisitions.

Just look at aw the commas. Typical of you Davy. Look at all your run on sentences. Typical of you Davy... Davy here has stolen many ideas and concepts from Ryan.

You will see why he has chosen the nickname "Kerri" for his sockpuppet at that revealing site.

Too stupid to be for real. You're trying SO hard. By any chance, aren't you our good old Chloe?

 

[jeff77]

User 'samosasauce' asked: "I'd love to read some of the things you've written". You replied:

You can read about some of Myatt's criminal work at this address...

Thus you're admitting that you - otherwise known as Chris McD - are the Moac who years ago put up that anti-Myatt blog containing libelous lies. An admission that the police might be interested in.

You will see why he has chosen the nickname "Kerri".

Using the same illogical argument you can see why Chris McD chose the nickname Ryan - "Aussie Bernie Ryan pleaded guilty to 55 charges of fraud and was yesterday sentenced to an eight month jail term suspended for 12 months. Ryan was also ordered to repay the $30,699 he stole."

 

[jeff77]

Too stupid to be for real. You're trying SO hard. By any chance, aren't you our good old Chloe?

I guess that's possible! On the other hand he or she or it has reproduced Chris McD's old accusations against DM exactly and then there's the use of words like "inquisition" in connection with the O9A which Chris McD first used in a members only posting on his blog.

If it is Chloe then her research is spot on.

 

[kerriscott]

By any chance, aren't you our good old Chloe?

My hunch is that it's not Chloe's trolling style, given the vitriol - and the jealousy, and what seems to be a personal hatred - in the posts. But, as ever, my hunch could be wrong.

 

[AnnaCzereda]

My style of trolling isn't meant to defame or belittle anyone.

Sure chickadee, sure.

 

[Satans_Serrated_Edge]

What is the point of this thread exactly? Anonymous pedants disapprove of some other dude that seems to be doing his own thing, and have subsequently chosen to make an 'example' of him?(which seems to add up to some furious angry typing in his general direction)

This sort of thing is supposed to 'increase' ONA peoples street credit so to speak? Librarian fight!

Anyhow that dude ain't C, as anyone that knows her would realize fairly quickly.

 

[Nitwit]

Sorry, just came back to pick up my hubris. Must have left it here. Have fun everyone :3

Oh and if there's any serious scientifically minded chaps out there interested in making sense of this acausal stuff, do drop me a message and help peer review the findings of the Society for Acausal Science and Philosphy [email protected]

Agios O Internet!

 

[AnnaCzereda]

What is the point of this thread exactly?

To discredit Chris, to make him look like a piece of **** in the eyes of the general "public" and to make him feel like a piece of **** i.e., to push him till he breaks. That's the point of this thread and any other threads; on 600, Facebook, not to mention blogs. Just a little bit of online "gang stalking".

Librarian fight!

Perhaps it is a librarian fight, even funny at times, but this online smear campaign seems to work nicely on Chris, who already denounced eight years of his writing and wrote some silly things on his blog, which he later edited when prompted.

You seem to underestimate the power of words.

Anyhow that dude ain't C, as anyone that knows her would realize fairly quickly.

Thanks for the clarification, Mr Dread. I know you know people sooooo well they will never ever manage to surprise you. :sarcastic

 

[Satans_Serrated_Edge]

Rarely.

I've known, and been in fairly regular contact with, the individual in question for about 6 years. I know its trendy to accuse everybody of being everybody these days, and I also know you prefer creative narrative to the truth, but that still ain't Chloe. In fact, I know exactly who this 'mystery poster' is, but I will not do here what I am so often accused of doing by these folks;which of course is "spoil the jape"

Carry on.