Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
See, for example: Two Bad Speeches and Scant Hope for Peace.
I find fans of politicians incredibly disturbing.
I find fans of politicians incredibly disturbing.
I'm not particularly a fan of Netanyahu-- or any other politician I can think of. I just thought it was a pretty decent speech.
Wow, it's a politician talking about politics and war. What a discovery.
Found it. After bragging about manipulating the US, he brags about breaking the Oslo Accord and then gives his ideal ratio of 2% of Palestine for Palestinians, 98% for Israel.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7dw89jICTU
Your interpretation differs from mine. Mine has the advantage of explaining the unchecked expansion of the illegal settlements in Palestine, while yours does not, so I think I will stick with what I've got.Aside from the fact that that video was rather questionably edited, it was also provided outside of context. It has been often stated by various Israeli administrations that a small percentage of currently Israeli land will have to be swapped for land currently deemed part of the West Bank. I believe that is what he was talking about, not reducing the Palestinian territory to two percent of its claimed area.
He was clearly talking about the Palestinians wanting all of Israel, from the river to the sea, and that he was adamant that they not get that. In service of that, he insisted that Oslo requirements be conditional upon Palestinian actions (which they never fulfilled, as he knew they would not), and he claimed that he would exercise Israel's right to deem any area a military institution (which he labeled a security zone) so as to ensure that Israeli armed forces would remain stationed in a future Palestinian State, presumably to ensure that no illegal buildup of paramilitary forces and accumulation of war machinery would take place.
Not the plan I would prefer or ideally support, but hardly diabolical.
In fact, it seems like it would only sound diabolical if one believed that the State of Israel had no right to exist, and there should only be a Palestinian state in its place....
… and trying to position himself as a viable alternative to an Hamas incessantly enabled by Netanyahu. You are fawning over a disgraceful cancer.But overall I thought it was a pretty good speech, well-done. And a positive, though likely to be ignored, counterpoint to Abbas' speech, which was just a cesspit of trash-- deeply disappointing from someone who had been trying to position himself as the moderate and reasonable alternative to Hamas.
and trying to position himself as a viable alternative to an Hamas incessantly enabled by Netanyahu. You are fawning over a disgraceful cancer.