• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Baha'i and Messengers

TransmutingSoul

One Planet, One People, Please!
Premium Member
So according to good science, the sun cannot move any closer to earth, to do so would be the end of life as we know it, also to look directly at the sun we need a filter.

So when it is offered that spiritually, the same laws are applicable, why is this then poor logic?

God does not descend into creation, thus a Messenger is sent. The Messenger is clothed in a body that filters us from the rays that would render us blind.

Only those that look through that filter will see the rays of the sun.

That is sound and logical reasoning. John 1:18 shows this.

"No one has seen God at any time. The only begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, He has declared Him."

Regards Tony

Yeah, yeah. Poor Tony. It's always someone else's failure. Story of your life.

I note you did not offer a reply to this post.

Regards Tony
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Are you suggesting it doesn't exist?
No, I am suggesting that science can never prove that God exists.
And why should we even accept what believers claim about any God? It's unknowable, and if a believer claims to know something, it is a lie.
The Essence of God is unknowable but we can know some of the attributes of God and will of God through the Messengers, although God is sanctified above all attributes and holy above all names.
 

lukethethird

unknown member
No, I am suggesting that science can never prove that God exists.

The Essence of God is unknowable but we can know some of the attributes of God and will of God through the Messengers, although God is sanctified above all attributes and holy above all names.
These messengers of God that failed to bring about the world peace that they promised to deliver, they legit?
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
No, I am suggesting that science can never prove that God exists.
That is a huge liability for theists.

Hit the iceberg. Don't bother using the lifeboats.

The Essence of God is unknowable
Assuming any god exists, which you can't know.

but we can know some of the attributes of God and will of God through the Messengers
But how can you know attributes of something you don't know exists?

it's like saying unicorns have shiny hair. How would you know?

Even the messengers don't know since you said God is unknowable, so they are included.

although God is sanctified above all attributes and holy above all names.
Which is a guess since God is unknowable. So we reject this claim.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
That is a huge liability for theists.

Hit the iceberg. Don't bother using the lifeboats.
It is not a liability at all because we know that God exists.
Anyone who would expect scientific proof of God knows nothing about God.
Assuming any god exists, which you can't know.
I do know, but how I know is not something you can understand.
But how can you know attributes of something you don't know exists?

it's like saying unicorns have shiny hair. How would you know?

Even the messengers don't know since you said God is unknowable, so they are included.
I do know that God exists. The Messengers also know that God exists. What nobody can ever know, not even the Messengers, is the Essence of God. The Essence of God is God’s intrinsic nature, things such as what God is comprised of, how and where God exists, how God functions.
Which is a guess since God is unknowable. So we reject this claim.
It is a belief and since you do not hold the belief of course you reject it.
 
Top