Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Then at first glance my eyes saw this thread as "bun smacking" Guess I wasn't too far off.....Yeah, please define "smacking".
Smacking as in "upside your child's head"...yeah...let's ban this.
Smacking as in "on the hand" or a "swift smack to the rear"...no. I believe it's a parent's right to decide whether physical discipline is necessary and sometimes and in certain circumstances, physical discipline may be the best option.
A child learns by example, all a smack does is reinforce that violence is an acceptable punishment, a quick and easy solution.
Yes, and he is a terror. I would never dream of hitting him though.Do you have children?
Yes, and he is a terror. I would never dream of hitting him though.
More power to you. I believe spanking can be used properly and in some cases can be the only way to get through to a child. However, it isn't my first choice and it is only used when all other forms of discipline have failed. My daughter is 6 now and pretty well behaved. She's had her butt smacked a few times but never a true spanking. Normally taking away privileges works best.
To a child under 6 all a spanking does is tell them that it is okay to hit IMO. You wouldnt lash out at an adult and if you did it you would rightly end up in court. I believe the same protection should be afforded to children.
I was spanked as a child and while I believe, as you that my parents acted out of love, and I am pretty close to them now, I still have flashbacks of it. It will never leave my memory, and is something I have never been able to tell them for fear of the hurt it may cause. There are ALWAYS (albeit more hard work) alternatives to smacking a child as punishment..
I disagree, especially with your using your own experience as the deciding factor. I was spanked as a child and have no trauma related to it at all. What does that tell you? Absolutely nothing, just like your experience tells us nothing.
My experience is not in any way meant to be a deciding factor. The fact is it is wrong to hit people, especially kids. It is a weak willed act of agression against those you love most. I see it as absolutely no difference to hitting your wife, and probably worse, as it helps shape the childs attitudes in later life.
You see it, but you label it as fact. This is your mistake. If it is a fact then there must be some supporting evidence beyond your personal experiences and flights of fancy. I have no problem with you stating your opinion but you continually phrase it in a manner that leads people to believe you have some knowledge of the subject and evidence to back up your statements. Do you? If not then please state your opinions as opinions instead of facts.
It is wrong as far as the law is concerned.Facts aren't dependent upon location. They're dependent on evidence.