Majikthise
nude
What do you suppose Thoreau might have been referring to when he said most men lead lives of quiet desperation?
He must have been raising teenage children.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What do you suppose Thoreau might have been referring to when he said most men lead lives of quiet desperation?
Would it be fair to characterize most of the people you actually know as basically or fundamentally unhappy, but most often distracted from their fundamental unhappiness by any number of things? Why or why not?
Additionally, if most of the people you know practice distraction, do most of the people you know bounce from one distraction to another? Or do they tend to obsess with just one or a few things?
For the purposes of this thread, I understand "happiness" to mean feelings of general well-being.
For the purposes of this thread, I understand "happiness" to mean feelings of general well-being.
I'm not sure I'd say there's a "most". Some people I know seem generally happy, others seem generally unhappy.Would it be fair to characterize most of the people you actually know as basically or fundamentally unhappy, but most often distracted from their fundamental unhappiness by any number of things? Why or why not?
I would say most people I know are ignorant, and therefore probably unhappy.
I heard ignorance was bliss!I would say most people I know are ignorant, and therefore probably unhappy.
Forgive me if this is an unfair question, but is that how you (and your family) feel?Would it be fair to characterize most of the people you actually know as basically or fundamentally unhappy, but most often distracted from their fundamental unhappiness by any number of things?
Forgive me if this is an unfair question, but is that how you (and your family) feel?
Thanks for the response. I'm pleased that the answer was "For the most part, no."
I tend to see they have moments of happiness, but their moments of unhappiness are a lot more intense and long lasting.I've found the exact opposite to be true. Ignorant people who have no goals in their lives are many times fat, dumb, and happy.
The people I know are fundamentally happy, and seek to improve their life experiences regularly. they are always engaged in something. it could be a life long dedication to martial arts, it can be travel and cultural experiences, it can be taking on acting, brewing beer, or climbing mountains.Would it be fair to characterize most of the people you actually know as basically or fundamentally unhappy, but most often distracted from their fundamental unhappiness by any number of things? Why or why not?
I have a friend who has been practicing martial arts all his life, he has been instructing them for years as well. he is also engaged in other things, from training people by being their nutrition coach, to studying acting and preforming.Additionally, if most of the people you know practice distraction, do most of the people you know bounce from one distraction to another? Or do they tend to obsess with just one or a few things?
Most of my friends go back to highschool, some of them go way before that to elementary school and one or two even to living as neighbors and going to kindergarten together. we are very supportive of each other, and I'm always looking forward to see them and hear about their shenanigans. I know them as opinionated, and just generally interested in living a full life.For the purposes of this thread, I understand "happiness" to mean feelings of general well-being.