• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Before You Ask, "Does God Exist?"...

viole

Ontological Naturalist
Premium Member
That's their problem, if any have ears to hear let them hear.

And that is your proof of Jesus divine existence, right?

They could say exactly the same. And you would be on square one, I am afraid.

Ciao

- viole
 

Kemosloby

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
And that is your proof of Jesus divine existence, right?

They could say exactly the same. And you would be on square one, I am afraid.

Ciao

- viole
An example of proof. I don't think we're on the same wavelength. Like I said, and as Jesus said, "If any have ears to hear let them hear". And that about sums it up.
 

viole

Ontological Naturalist
Premium Member
An example of proof. I don't think we're on the same wavelength. Like I said, and as Jesus said, "If any have ears to hear let them hear". And that about sums it up.

Oh well, if Jesus said that, or better, someone wrote that Jesus said that, then that should be evidence enough :)

Of course we are not on the same wavelength. Is that a requirement for us to both accept this as a proof of anything?

Ciao

- viole
 

Kemosloby

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Oh well, if Jesus said that, or better, someone wrote that Jesus said that, then that should be evidence enough :)

Of course we are not on the same wavelength. Is that a requirement for us to both accept this as a proof of anything?

Ciao

- viole
I mean the wavelength that I don't care if the Jews don't see it the same way as I do, or the Apostles did, or like minded Christians do.
 

viole

Ontological Naturalist
Premium Member
I mean the wavelength that I don't care if the Jews don't see it the same way as I do, or the Apostles did, or like minded Christians do.

So, in order for all you say to be a proof that God exists, which is your claim, you have to be like minded?

Ciao

- viole
 

Kemosloby

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
So, in order for all you say to be a proof that God exists, which is your claim, you have to be like minded?

Ciao

- viole
You have to read it like I did to see the proof of God exists, the prophecy laced into the words and symbolism of the old testament. Prophecies of Christ on the cross. Who is like God, who could make all that come together?
 

viole

Ontological Naturalist
Premium Member
You have to read it like I did to see the proof of God exists, the prophecy laced into the words and symbolism of the old testament. Prophecies of Christ on the cross. Who is like God, who could make all that come together?

Well, with a bit of imagination, I could probably find amazing prophecies laced into the words of any book. Including Pinocchio.

So, my rejection stands. Come back to us when you have convinced, at least, the other believers in the OT. Telling me that they do not have ears to listen, would not do, I am afraid. Everybody can say that.

Ciao

- viole
 

Kemosloby

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Well, with a bit of imagination, I could probably find amazing prophecies laced into the words of any book. Including Pinocchio.

So, my rejection stands. Come back to us when you have convinced, at least, the other believers in the OT. Telling me that they do not have ears to listen, would not do, I am afraid. Everybody can say that.

Ciao

- viole
How many of you are there?
 

Kemosloby

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
I don't know. i am alone enjoyng a couple of Negronis and typing things on my iPad.

Are you about to make some ad-populum argument, by any chance?

Ciao

- viole
You said, "So, my rejection stands. Come back to us when you have convinced, at least, the other believers in the OT."
So I'm wondering who is "us". And who are the other believers in the OT? The Jews who don't believe in Jesus? You're asking the impossible, since God has blinded them for some reason. How could I undo what God has done?

John 12:40 "The Lord has blinded their eyes and hardened their hearts--so that their eyes cannot see, and their hearts cannot understand, and they cannot turn to me and have me heal them."
 

viole

Ontological Naturalist
Premium Member
You said, "So, my rejection stands. Come back to us when you have convinced, at least, the other believers in the OT."
So I'm wondering who is "us". And who are the other believers in the OT? The Jews who don't believe in Jesus? You're asking the impossible, since God has blinded them for some reason. How could I undo what God has done?

John 12:40 "The Lord has blinded their eyes and hardened their hearts--so that their eyes cannot see, and their hearts cannot understand, and they cannot turn to me and have me heal them."

Poor Jews, God blinded them and hardened their heart. What a mean thing to do. He should be ashamed of Himself.

What did they do to deserve that?

Ciao

- viole

P.S. So much for free will.
 
Last edited:

Kemosloby

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Poor Jews, God blinded them and hardened their heart. What a mean thing to do. He should be ashamed of Himself.

What did they do to deserve that?

Ciao

- viole
I don't know, nail him on a cross or something?
 

Kemosloby

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
They should have not done that?

Ciao

- viole
How could they not have done that. It was their misfortune to get that role in God's mysterious plan of redemption. Who knows why, but it doesn't change the fact that God prophecied of his crucifixion, at the hands of people who didn't believe in him or understand said prophecies. And that is convincing proof of God.
 

viole

Ontological Naturalist
Premium Member
How could they not have done that. It was their misfortune to get that role in God's mysterious plan of redemption. Who knows why, but it doesn't change the fact that God prophecied of his crucifixion, at the hands of people who didn't believe in him or understand said prophecies. And that is convincing proof of God.

So, they were unlucky, by being at the wrong place at the wrong time, and God blinded them and hardened their heart because of that? All further generations, as well? Well, maybe not, since some messianic jews managed to get over their hardened heart and blindness, despite God's verdict, for some reason. And that God is the source of your morality and logical thinking, right?

Well, that God redemption plan is truely mysterious, lol.

And what is even more mysterious, if that was possible, is that you really believe that this serves as a proof of anything.

Ciao

- viole
 
Last edited:

Kemosloby

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
So, they were unlucky, by being at the wrong place at the wrong time, and God blinded them and hardened their heart because of that? All further generations, as well? Well, maybe not, since some messianic jews managed to get over their hardened heart and blindness, despite God's verdict, for some reason. And that God is the source of your morality and logical thinking, right?

Well, that God redemption plan is truely mysterious, lol.

And what is even more mysterious, if that was possible, is that you really believe that this serves as a proof of anything.

Ciao

- viole

You seem a bit hard hearted towards God.
 

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
Before you ask, "does god or the gods exist", shouldn't you be asking, "If god or the gods exist, then how would we know that they exist?"

Isn't the latter the more fundamental question? Why or why not?
The latter is implied in the former. There's no 'ontology' without epistemology.
 

David T

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Let me reframe the question,
[QUOTE="Sunstone, post: shouldn't you be asking, "If god or the gods exist, then how would we know that they exist?"

Let me reframe your question. " if reality exists how would we know it exists?". I appreciate the religious skeptic, but skeptics tend to allow for an independent reality from reality to exist as they argue as to the existence or non existence of God. A kind of linguistic virtuuzation that people go and get phds write on topics in great fluffery stating the obvious as if it's meaningful and profound. In science we have to ask is Darwin a profound discoverer or is he just a symptom of a rather lost in outer space culture of its own ideas? He states the obvious I have penis male chimpanzees have penis we are related!!! OMG so profound what insight what genius. Or OMG he is a deep threat to the fantasy reality we have created at Oxford, at Cambridge at Harvard at every university in Western culture0up to that time!!!! Because we the faithful know that all truth starts with a BOOK. stupid stupid stupid which leads to talking about reality independence to of it. Really? Breathe everyone.
 

corynski

Reality First!
Premium Member
I think the ability to make at least simple deductions is something that develops quite naturally in humans (despite the disturbing fact that in forums such as this very few adults seem to be able to actually state a deduction). Very young children can correctly say whether or not a ball is in a box, depending on what they've seen beforehand. This ability seems to me to entail some sort of deductive process. First graders readily grasp addition and subtraction of abstract numbers. Obviously deduction is happening there.

So perhaps people who are asking themselves questions about whether “god or the gods exist” have already dealt with the issue of how one can make such a deduction.




BTW, I wonder how many people actually believe that a pantheon of gods exist? After all, such an idea directly violates the “oneness” concept associated with God. Maybe polytheism and monotheism shouldn't be lumped together too much.
Throughout history and prehistory societies have professed many, many gods and goddesses. And logically so, I would suggest, if these gods and goddesses were part of a world view that had long before accepted water and wind spirits and such. Just as Yahweh is said to have been a storm god out of Arabia. The 'one god' concept apparently came later when men became more sophisticated thinkers, or the opposite. Julian Jaynes wrote of the origin of gods through dreams and nightmarish experiences, convinced their ancestors were now 'gods'...... Men create gods, and not vice versa, would seem to be the logical conclusion.
 
Top