but that won't stop him from infringing on the inalienable rights of those that do not adhere to christian theocracy...
i dont necessarily know that cur!ous is interested in infringing on anyone's rights. nor do i believe hir capable of doing much infringing. if i'm reading hir response to the OP correctly it's simply stating that christians (from the perspective s/he is familiar) believe that homosexuality is an abomination before god and is not to be considered "a gift".
and cur!ous is allowed to believe that all s/he wants without provoking argument from me, provided (as my post is trying to determine) this person doesn't expect everyone else who's not a christian (or not a christian who shares this perspective) to also believe it.