• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Belief in God or texts

Sabour

Well-Known Member
We could come into this world with no religion, start believing in god, then pick a text but all texts will verify that god is real. What verifies which texts are from god, which all theists believe in one form or another?

Well believing in God will limit the texts you would look at.

Texts is not just about the fact that God exists. There are many other things one should consider.
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
Well believing in God will limit the texts you would look at.

Texts is not just about the fact that God exists. There are many other things one should consider.

With that you are saying attributes of god verify texts. I am not sure I agree because no matter the theology you can be any religion and believe any text.

The more pressing question, how does just belief in god spell out any attributes of truth that makes certain texts more viable than any other? What else should be considered?

I like the tests idea, they speak truth and could accurately predict. Well einstein did that so maybe other things can be considered? All prophets with scripts pass these tests to the believers.
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
I didn't want to create another thread.

I don't know if I can really take any sacred texts seriously to say what god should or shouldn't be. As soon as one text is preferred it colors god a certain way with attributes and the very nature of God. If people believe in god first how is it possible to find out gods attributes without considering one text over another as legitimate as to what it says about god?
 

outhouse

Atheistically
What verifies which texts are from god, which all theists believe in one form or another?

That comes from historians and science.

Both of which show, only man has created deities. Then wrote and redefinied them as beliefs spread to different cultures.


If we had words from god, there would not be so many historical and scientific errors.

If we had words from god, there would be no fighting over intepretation. Because if he made us, he would also know how we think.

It would not have been responsible for a god to leave us so many different versions of his so called words :facepalm: that only mirrors the culture that did the writing :facepalm:


God does not exist scientifically, and no writing has ever been attributed to any god with credibility.
 

outhouse

Atheistically
I didn't want to create another thread.

I don't know if I can really take any sacred texts seriously to say what god should or shouldn't be. As soon as one text is preferred it colors god a certain way with attributes and the very nature of God. If people believe in god first how is it possible to find out gods attributes without considering one text over another as legitimate as to what it says about god?

Good post.

yes only man writes and defines god ALWAYS mirroring the cultural needs and wants of the people writing the definition.

Which is factually creting a deity on paper/papyrus
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
Does belief in god drive the belief in particular texts or is it the other way around. The bible or Quran are true therefore god exists?

Probably depends on the individual.

Personal experiences drive my beliefs which drive which texts I find credible. Many folks I talk to claim their experiences drive there belief as well.

Yet many also claim a text like the Bible to be the ultimate arbitrator of their belief. They'd reject personal experience if it is seen as contradictory to religious texts.

I guess I am more willing to trust my own experiences then what others claim those experiences should be. At the same time I've come across a significant number of individuals who have independently arrived at similar conclusions as I have.
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
Does belief in god drive the belief in particular texts or is it the other way around. The bible or Quran are true therefore god exists?
The texts don't convince anyone -- and if they do, that belief is tenuous. Heres why: Faith isn't a "head thing" -- that is, one doesn't intellectualize faith. Faith is a "heart thing" -- that is, one internalizes faith. Faith is always best built within a foundation of relationships that work pragmatically in the world, not only in theory, on paper.

Furthermore, where the bible is concerned, the intent of the written text was never to engender belief; it was simply to record the Tradition of the believing community.
 
Top