heres where i strongly disagree.
god was only sighted back in ancient times by a select few who were generaly religious leaders. Funny how one has to be a prominent figure to have seen god except for a odd few.
since ancient times we are not having credibile people seeing god and funny no world wide miracles of ancient times either.
Not true at all. Many, many people have said they've experienced God over the last couple thousand years. You don't have to be a prominent figure to have "experienced God". It's interesting that you inject "credible" into it. That's a judgement call. You might discount them as not credible, but then many people will discount your witnesses of bigfoot as equally not credible.
the sighting volume of god is done by biased people
sightings of BF are by everyone.
Wow. Come on, really? The sightings of each are done by the same kind of people. Generally the people who see God are people who believe, just as generally the people who see bigfoot are people who believe. There are atheists who claim to see God, and there are people who don't believe in bigfoot who claim to have seen one. And in both cases there are people in the middle who claim to have seen them.
My uncle strongly did not believe and thought it was a joke until his hunting experience. 2 big men with high powered rifles and both scared to death. neither afraid of bears or mountan lions or any other big game.
I just got in touch with a buddy from humbolt area, im waiting on his message as im asking him about local BF sightings ill keep you posted as to what he says as well. Know anyone who has seen god lately and if they did what did he look like??? all my supposed sightings all describe the same creature.
They describe the same creature as much as the people who see God describe the same God; that is vaguely the same, but short on exact details. As I said above, there are atheists who have converted to Christianity after "seeing God". You uncle's example is no different than them.
in my opinion one is a known myth with 3000 year old fiction for its basis and the other has a possibility with 400 years of modern man sightings and legends going back in native americans for thousands of years.
Yes, according to you the one is a known myth while the other is not. We've established that. However, both things have the same kind of evidence supporting them. Yet in one case you believe the evidence, and in the other you don't. To me they're both myths, because I understand that both have the same kind of evidence.
I would like him to exist, yes ill state that.
the important thing for you to understand is my wanting to believe HURTS no one
religion is guilty of genocide and crimes against humanity slowing the education proccess down AND it isnt finished due to the ignorance behind it. in my opinion.
that a one hell of a difference.
People believing in religion hurts no one, too. My parents have been religious their whole life, and they haven't committed genocide or even beat up or discriminated against anyone because of it. Religion is not guilty of those things you claim. People are guilty of them.
But regardless of that, this doesn't address the issue at hand. The issue at hand is the fact that you produce the same evidence for bigfoot that people produce for God. Yet you believe this evidence is substantial enough in bigfoot's case to believe it exists, but not substantial enough in God's case. You have a double standard.
and there some measurement stuff for ya.