I've judged it by listening & reading a range of news sources.
I look at coverage frequency, coverage content, & events.
From my personnal experience of your listening and reading habit. That doesn't mean much.
But her murder was the latest in a series of police killings of white
people in the US. Many more whites are shot by cops than backs.
Blacks are only shot at a higher rate.
If this were more widely known, perhaps there'd be more impetus
to reform policing to make it less dangerous to us all.
Not really, because rates determine risk and for a community to perceive and understand a threat it must feel the risk. The truth is is that even if raw numbers are high, if the rate is low, the risk will be understood as being low.
You'd think that Australians would be keenly aware that
one of their own (Damond) was murdered by a US cop.
Yet, only Floyd was prominently in their minds.
Why?
They very well could have forgotten about an event occuring 4 years prior for a variety of reason. Why imply malice where ignorance or forgetfulness can explain just as adequatly? The name of victims and the specific of their cases often falls in the shadow unless they become the symbol of a cause or martyrs.
The media portray murderous cops as being only a racism
problem. It would be a darn shame if blacks were still
murdered at the same rate that cops murder white folk.
That would still be too many murders.
I disagree. The media doesn't portray police brutality as being a racist problem only. It does often and frequently mention its racist component, but critique of the policing and judicial system in general are common and numerous to the point that some points like ending mandatory minimum laws, reforming police accountability systems, war on drugs, SWAT raid abuse are now subject of mainstream politics and not the domain of political activists, a few cooky libertarians, anarchists and socialists.